Competition Law Enforcement in Digital Markets: The Brazilian Perspective on Unilateral Conducts

Q2 Social Sciences
Caio Mário S. Pereira Neto, R. Pastore, Raíssa Paixão
{"title":"Competition Law Enforcement in Digital Markets: The Brazilian Perspective on Unilateral Conducts","authors":"Caio Mário S. Pereira Neto, R. Pastore, Raíssa Paixão","doi":"10.1177/0003603X221126159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Following an international trend, Brazil’s National Competition Authority (NCA), the Administrative Council for Economic Defense (CADE), has been devoting more attention to potential anticompetitive conducts in the digital economy. This article discusses a set of cases involving unilateral conducts in the digital economy, assessing CADE’s decision-making practice, enforcement challenges, and tools used. Building from CADE’s case law, we single out some relevant aspects of the Brazilian experience, including (1) the cautious approach taken by CADE when evaluating effects of unilateral conducts in final decisions, (2) the use of interim measures to intervene in early stages of investigations, and (3) the use of settlements to reach quick solutions with negotiated remedies. A brief conclusion discusses possible future trends given the experience discussed in the article.","PeriodicalId":36832,"journal":{"name":"Antitrust Bulletin","volume":"67 1","pages":"622 - 641"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antitrust Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0003603X221126159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Following an international trend, Brazil’s National Competition Authority (NCA), the Administrative Council for Economic Defense (CADE), has been devoting more attention to potential anticompetitive conducts in the digital economy. This article discusses a set of cases involving unilateral conducts in the digital economy, assessing CADE’s decision-making practice, enforcement challenges, and tools used. Building from CADE’s case law, we single out some relevant aspects of the Brazilian experience, including (1) the cautious approach taken by CADE when evaluating effects of unilateral conducts in final decisions, (2) the use of interim measures to intervene in early stages of investigations, and (3) the use of settlements to reach quick solutions with negotiated remedies. A brief conclusion discusses possible future trends given the experience discussed in the article.
数字市场中的竞争法执法:巴西单方面行为的视角
跟随国际趋势,巴西国家竞争管理局(NCA),即经济防御管理委员会(CADE),越来越关注数字经济中潜在的反竞争行为。本文讨论了一组涉及数字经济中单边行为的案例,评估了CADE的决策实践、执行挑战和使用的工具。根据CADE的判例法,我们挑选出巴西经验的一些相关方面,包括:(1)CADE在评估最终决定中单方面行为的影响时采取的谨慎态度,(2)在调查的早期阶段使用临时措施进行干预,以及(3)使用和解协议通过谈判补救措施达成快速解决方案。一个简短的结论讨论了在文章中讨论的经验可能的未来趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Antitrust Bulletin
Antitrust Bulletin Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信