Evaluation of Phenotypic Methods in the Clinical Isolates for Biofilm Detection of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli in Mukalla city, Hadhramout, Yemen

B. Eidha, Amal Ali Bahakim, O. Riginal, Pen A Ccess
{"title":"Evaluation of Phenotypic Methods in the Clinical Isolates for Biofilm Detection of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli in Mukalla city, Hadhramout, Yemen","authors":"B. Eidha, Amal Ali Bahakim, O. Riginal, Pen A Ccess","doi":"10.20428/yjms.v17i1.2123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Biofilms represent a complex structure comprising prokaryotic cells, proteins, sugars, and DNA as majorconstituents. Bacteria can grow in biofilms and associated with human infections and considered to be highly resistant toantibiotics. There are various methods to detect biofilm production like tissue culture plate (TCP), tube method (TM), andCongo red agar method (CRA).Objectives: This study aimed to compare three methods for the detection of biofilm formation in the clinical isolatesStaphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli.Methods: A total of 60 clinical isolates of S. aureus and E. coli were subjected to biofilm detection methods by TM, CRAand TCP.Results: Out of the total 60 clinical isolates of S. aureus and E. coli, TCP method detected 33 (55%) as strong, 15 (25%)as moderate and 12 (20%) as weak/non-biofilm producers. The sensitivity of TM and CRA was 56.3% and 60.4%, and thespecificity was 58.3% and 66.7% respectively. In our validation of the diagnostic biofilm production tests, the TCP methodwas superior to TM and CRA methods for biofilm detection.Conclusion: The study concluded that the TCP method is accurate and reliable method for the detection of biofilmformation in the clinical isolates S. aureus and E. coli compared to TM and CRA methods, and can be recommended as ageneral screening method for the detection of biofilm producing bacteria in clinical laboratories.","PeriodicalId":32479,"journal":{"name":"Yemeni Journal for Medical Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yemeni Journal for Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20428/yjms.v17i1.2123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Biofilms represent a complex structure comprising prokaryotic cells, proteins, sugars, and DNA as majorconstituents. Bacteria can grow in biofilms and associated with human infections and considered to be highly resistant toantibiotics. There are various methods to detect biofilm production like tissue culture plate (TCP), tube method (TM), andCongo red agar method (CRA).Objectives: This study aimed to compare three methods for the detection of biofilm formation in the clinical isolatesStaphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli.Methods: A total of 60 clinical isolates of S. aureus and E. coli were subjected to biofilm detection methods by TM, CRAand TCP.Results: Out of the total 60 clinical isolates of S. aureus and E. coli, TCP method detected 33 (55%) as strong, 15 (25%)as moderate and 12 (20%) as weak/non-biofilm producers. The sensitivity of TM and CRA was 56.3% and 60.4%, and thespecificity was 58.3% and 66.7% respectively. In our validation of the diagnostic biofilm production tests, the TCP methodwas superior to TM and CRA methods for biofilm detection.Conclusion: The study concluded that the TCP method is accurate and reliable method for the detection of biofilmformation in the clinical isolates S. aureus and E. coli compared to TM and CRA methods, and can be recommended as ageneral screening method for the detection of biofilm producing bacteria in clinical laboratories.
也门哈德拉穆特穆卡拉市金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌生物膜检测临床分离株表型方法的评价
生物膜是由原核细胞、蛋白质、糖和DNA组成的复杂结构。细菌可以在生物膜中生长,与人类感染有关,被认为对抗生素具有高度耐药性。检测生物膜生成的方法有多种,如组织培养平板法(TCP)、试管法(TM)和刚果红琼脂法(CRA)。目的:比较临床分离物中金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌生物膜形成的三种检测方法。方法:对临床分离的60株金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌进行TM、cra和TCP生物膜检测。结果:在临床分离的60株金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌中,TCP法检测出33株(55%)为强菌株,15株(25%)为中等菌株,12株(20%)为弱/无生物膜菌株。TM和CRA的敏感性分别为56.3%和60.4%,特异性分别为58.3%和66.7%。在我们的诊断性生物膜生成试验验证中,TCP方法优于TM和CRA方法检测生物膜。结论:与TM和CRA方法相比,TCP方法是检测临床分离的金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌生物膜形成的准确可靠的方法,可推荐作为临床实验室检测产膜细菌的通用筛选方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信