Early life factors associated with old age physical frailty: evidence from India

CV Irshad , T Muhammad , Arun Balachandran , TV Sekher , Umakant Dash
{"title":"Early life factors associated with old age physical frailty: evidence from India","authors":"CV Irshad ,&nbsp;T Muhammad ,&nbsp;Arun Balachandran ,&nbsp;TV Sekher ,&nbsp;Umakant Dash","doi":"10.1016/j.ahr.2022.100089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Physical frailty is one of the most important phenotypes used to understand the vulnerable nature of older adults. The paper examined the association of childhood factors, including birth order, childhood socioeconomic status, and other exposures with old age physical frailty. The study further explored the gender dimensions of physical frailty prevalence.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data from the Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (LASI, 2017-18), wave-1 were used. The sample size for the study was 24,513 older adults aged 60 years and above (12,510 females and 12,003 males). Physical frailty was assessed using the measurement approach proposed by Fried and colleagues.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The results indicated significant gender difference in the prevalence of physical frailty with 39.03% of older women and 32.49% of men being frail. Older adults with lower levels of mothers’ (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.26; 95% confidence interval (CI):1.01–1.58) or fathers’ education (aOR: 1.33; 95% CI:1.18–1.50) or poor childhood health status (aOR: 1.48; 95% CI:1.27–1.71) had higher odds of physical frailty. Compared to older women with a well-off childhood financial condition, women with average childhood financial status had 38% (aOR: 1.38, 95% CI:1.01-1.89) higher odds of reporting physical frailty. In contrast, older men with poor childhood financial status had lower odds (aOR: 0.73; 95% CI:0.56-0.96) of physical frailty than older men with well-off childhood financial status.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Early life disadvantages in health, financial condition and lack of parental education had significant positive associations with old age physical frailty. The findings suggest the importance of childhood factors in policy and practice in terms of addressing old age physical frailty.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72129,"journal":{"name":"Aging and health research","volume":"2 3","pages":"Article 100089"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266703212200035X/pdfft?md5=cb8b0ec6293fe6cc41c437adea306820&pid=1-s2.0-S266703212200035X-main.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging and health research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266703212200035X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background

Physical frailty is one of the most important phenotypes used to understand the vulnerable nature of older adults. The paper examined the association of childhood factors, including birth order, childhood socioeconomic status, and other exposures with old age physical frailty. The study further explored the gender dimensions of physical frailty prevalence.

Methods

Data from the Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (LASI, 2017-18), wave-1 were used. The sample size for the study was 24,513 older adults aged 60 years and above (12,510 females and 12,003 males). Physical frailty was assessed using the measurement approach proposed by Fried and colleagues.

Results

The results indicated significant gender difference in the prevalence of physical frailty with 39.03% of older women and 32.49% of men being frail. Older adults with lower levels of mothers’ (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.26; 95% confidence interval (CI):1.01–1.58) or fathers’ education (aOR: 1.33; 95% CI:1.18–1.50) or poor childhood health status (aOR: 1.48; 95% CI:1.27–1.71) had higher odds of physical frailty. Compared to older women with a well-off childhood financial condition, women with average childhood financial status had 38% (aOR: 1.38, 95% CI:1.01-1.89) higher odds of reporting physical frailty. In contrast, older men with poor childhood financial status had lower odds (aOR: 0.73; 95% CI:0.56-0.96) of physical frailty than older men with well-off childhood financial status.

Conclusion

Early life disadvantages in health, financial condition and lack of parental education had significant positive associations with old age physical frailty. The findings suggest the importance of childhood factors in policy and practice in terms of addressing old age physical frailty.

与老年身体虚弱相关的早期生活因素:来自印度的证据
身体虚弱是用来理解老年人脆弱天性的最重要的表型之一。这篇论文研究了童年时期的因素,包括出生顺序、童年时期的社会经济地位和其他与老年身体虚弱有关的因素。本研究进一步探讨了身体虚弱患病率的性别维度。方法采用印度纵向老龄化研究(LASI, 2017-18)的wave-1数据。该研究的样本量为24,513名60岁及以上的老年人(12,510名女性和12,003名男性)。使用弗里德及其同事提出的测量方法评估身体虚弱。结果老年人身体虚弱患病率性别差异显著,女性为39.03%,男性为32.49%。年龄较大的成年人,母亲的水平较低(调整优势比(aOR): 1.26;95%置信区间(CI): 1.01-1.58)或父亲的教育程度(aOR: 1.33;95% CI: 1.18-1.50)或儿童健康状况不佳(aOR: 1.48;95% CI: 1.27-1.71)有较高的身体虚弱几率。与童年经济状况良好的老年妇女相比,童年经济状况一般的妇女报告身体虚弱的几率高出38% (aOR: 1.38, 95% CI:1.01-1.89)。相比之下,童年经济状况较差的老年男性患乳腺癌的几率较低(aOR: 0.73;95%可信区间:0.56-0.96),与童年经济状况良好的老年男性相比,身体虚弱的风险更大。结论儿童早期健康、经济条件差、父母教育缺失与老年体弱有显著正相关。研究结果表明,在解决老年身体虚弱问题方面,童年因素在政策和实践中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Aging and health research
Aging and health research Clinical Neurology, Public Health and Health Policy, Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信