Comparison of three methods for computing the gravitational attraction of tesseroids at satellite altitude

IF 0.5 4区 地球科学 Q4 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Longjun Qiu, Zhaoxi Chen
{"title":"Comparison of three methods for computing the gravitational attraction of tesseroids at satellite altitude","authors":"Longjun Qiu,&nbsp;Zhaoxi Chen","doi":"10.1007/s11200-020-0149-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Global gravity modelling is one of the most important issues in geophysics and geodesy. Because a tesseroid model comprises the curvature of the Earth, the computation methods for the gravitational potential of tesseroids and its first-order derivatives in spherical coordinates are attracting great attention in recent years. In this paper we deal with the numerical evaluation of the radial component of the gravitational attraction generated by tesseroid masses at satellite height with the Gauss-Legendre quadrature (GLQ), the Taylor series expansion (TSE) and the prism approximation (PA) methods. Forward modelling of tesseroids of 1° × 1° and 5′ × 5′ are performed by three computation methods and the comparison between them are made in terms of computational efficiency and accuracy. The numerical results show that the GLQ of order 5 can provide the adequate accuracy for the gravity modelling of 1° × 1° tesseroids at satellite height. The GLQ of order 2 and TSE methods are superior to the PA approach in both computational accuracy and efficiency. The satellite height has important impact on the accuracy of the GLQ and TSE, whereas it has no effect on the PA method. In addition, we developed combined GLQ approach and combined TSE method, respectively, for global gravity modelling based on 1° × 1° and 5′ × 5′ tesseroids. Apart from the synthetic tesseroids, 1° × 1° data from the CRUST1.0 global crustal model and 5′ × 5′ rock-equivalent topographic data from the Earth2014 model are used to validate two combined methods. The numerical results show that these two combined methods can balance the computational accuracy and efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":22001,"journal":{"name":"Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica","volume":"65 2","pages":"128 - 147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11200-020-0149-3","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11200-020-0149-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Global gravity modelling is one of the most important issues in geophysics and geodesy. Because a tesseroid model comprises the curvature of the Earth, the computation methods for the gravitational potential of tesseroids and its first-order derivatives in spherical coordinates are attracting great attention in recent years. In this paper we deal with the numerical evaluation of the radial component of the gravitational attraction generated by tesseroid masses at satellite height with the Gauss-Legendre quadrature (GLQ), the Taylor series expansion (TSE) and the prism approximation (PA) methods. Forward modelling of tesseroids of 1° × 1° and 5′ × 5′ are performed by three computation methods and the comparison between them are made in terms of computational efficiency and accuracy. The numerical results show that the GLQ of order 5 can provide the adequate accuracy for the gravity modelling of 1° × 1° tesseroids at satellite height. The GLQ of order 2 and TSE methods are superior to the PA approach in both computational accuracy and efficiency. The satellite height has important impact on the accuracy of the GLQ and TSE, whereas it has no effect on the PA method. In addition, we developed combined GLQ approach and combined TSE method, respectively, for global gravity modelling based on 1° × 1° and 5′ × 5′ tesseroids. Apart from the synthetic tesseroids, 1° × 1° data from the CRUST1.0 global crustal model and 5′ × 5′ rock-equivalent topographic data from the Earth2014 model are used to validate two combined methods. The numerical results show that these two combined methods can balance the computational accuracy and efficiency.

计算卫星高度曲面引力的三种方法的比较
全球重力模拟是地球物理和大地测量学中的重要问题之一。由于曲面模型包含了地球的曲率,球面坐标系下曲面引力势及其一阶导数的计算方法近年来备受关注。本文用高斯-勒让德正交法(GLQ)、泰勒级数展开法(TSE)和棱镜近似法(PA)对曲面质量在卫星高度产生的引力的径向分量进行了数值计算。采用3种计算方法对1°× 1°和5′× 5′曲面进行了正演模拟,并对计算效率和精度进行了比较。数值结果表明,5阶GLQ可以为1°× 1°曲面在卫星高度上的重力模拟提供足够的精度。2阶GLQ和TSE方法在计算精度和效率上都优于PA方法。卫星高度对GLQ法和TSE法的精度有重要影响,而对PA法没有影响。此外,我们还分别开发了基于1°× 1°和5 ' × 5 '曲面的联合GLQ方法和联合TSE方法用于全球重力建模。除了合成曲面外,还使用了来自地壳1.0全球模型的1°× 1°数据和来自Earth2014模型的5′× 5′岩石等效地形数据对两种组合方法进行了验证。数值结果表明,这两种组合方法可以平衡计算精度和效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica
Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Studia geophysica et geodaetica is an international journal covering all aspects of geophysics, meteorology and climatology, and of geodesy. Published by the Institute of Geophysics of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, it has a long tradition, being published quarterly since 1956. Studia publishes theoretical and methodological contributions, which are of interest for academia as well as industry. The journal offers fast publication of contributions in regular as well as topical issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信