Assessment of Educational Environment of Newly Established Medical College by UG Medical Students: A Mixed Method Study

IF 0.2 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ankit Srivastava, S. Pathak, Urvashi Singh, A. Bihari, Manish Upadhyay
{"title":"Assessment of Educational Environment of Newly Established Medical College by UG Medical Students: A Mixed Method Study","authors":"Ankit Srivastava, S. Pathak, Urvashi Singh, A. Bihari, Manish Upadhyay","doi":"10.47203/ijch.2023.v35i02.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Educational environment always play a crucial role in the development of students as well as faculty of any institution. In India, there is a continuous increase in the number of medical colleges and the number of MBBS seats, but the quality of education with quantity is questionable. To answer this question, the present study was planned to know the educational environment in a new Medical Institution that ejected its alumni in 2018.\nAim: To analyze the educational environment of a newly established Medical College in eastern Uttar Pradesh.\nMaterials and Methods: The present study was a descriptive cross-sectional which took six months to complete. This study used the Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM) questionnaire, open-ended questions and focus group discussions (FGDs). The study was conducted on MBBS students in Government Medical College, Azamgarh, UP.\nResults: The batch-wise Global DREEM scores were 169.08 (alumni), 156.23 (interns), 168.76 (2015), 164.16 (2016), 176.23 (2017), 176.94 (2018). This demonstrates that the educational environment is satisfactory in all domains and comes under the 3rd category of the educational environment index. The FGDs showed a positive response in all batches but with high variability in scores, which indicates lack of standardization in Medical Education. The open-ended questions’ responses revealed many merits and demerits about five domains.\nConclusion: The variability of DREEM score, FGDs and open ended questions denotes the lack of standardization in the Medical Education system and the scores of the Education Environment Index (all domains) must move from category III (satisfactory) to category IV (excellence).","PeriodicalId":13363,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Community Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47203/ijch.2023.v35i02.019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Educational environment always play a crucial role in the development of students as well as faculty of any institution. In India, there is a continuous increase in the number of medical colleges and the number of MBBS seats, but the quality of education with quantity is questionable. To answer this question, the present study was planned to know the educational environment in a new Medical Institution that ejected its alumni in 2018. Aim: To analyze the educational environment of a newly established Medical College in eastern Uttar Pradesh. Materials and Methods: The present study was a descriptive cross-sectional which took six months to complete. This study used the Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM) questionnaire, open-ended questions and focus group discussions (FGDs). The study was conducted on MBBS students in Government Medical College, Azamgarh, UP. Results: The batch-wise Global DREEM scores were 169.08 (alumni), 156.23 (interns), 168.76 (2015), 164.16 (2016), 176.23 (2017), 176.94 (2018). This demonstrates that the educational environment is satisfactory in all domains and comes under the 3rd category of the educational environment index. The FGDs showed a positive response in all batches but with high variability in scores, which indicates lack of standardization in Medical Education. The open-ended questions’ responses revealed many merits and demerits about five domains. Conclusion: The variability of DREEM score, FGDs and open ended questions denotes the lack of standardization in the Medical Education system and the scores of the Education Environment Index (all domains) must move from category III (satisfactory) to category IV (excellence).
UG医学生对新建医学院教育环境评价的混合方法研究
教育环境对学生和教师的发展起着至关重要的作用。在印度,医学院的数量和MBBS的席位不断增加,但教育的质量与数量是有问题的。为了回答这个问题,本研究计划了解2018年驱逐校友的新医疗机构的教育环境。目的:分析北方邦东部一所新建医学院的教育环境。材料与方法:本研究采用描述性横断面法,历时6个月完成。本研究采用了邓迪就绪教育环境测量(DREEM)问卷、开放式问题和焦点小组讨论(fgd)。这项研究是在北方邦阿扎姆加尔政府医学院的MBBS学生中进行的。结果:Global DREEM分值分别为169.08(校友)、156.23(实习生)、168.76(2015)、164.16(2016)、176.23(2017)、176.94(2018)。这表明教育环境在各个领域都是令人满意的,属于教育环境指数的第三类。fgd在所有批次中都显示出积极的反应,但得分差异很大,这表明医学教育缺乏标准化。开放式问题的回答揭示了五个领域的许多优点和缺点。结论:DREEM评分、fgd和开放性问题的变异性表明医学教育系统缺乏标准化,教育环境指数(所有领域)的得分必须从III类(满意)提高到IV类(优秀)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Community Health
Indian Journal of Community Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
89
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信