ANALYSIS OF WING SEPARATION AND MID-AIR BREAKUP IN LIGHT TRAINING AIRCRAFT

IF 0.8 Q3 ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE
M. Hirabayashi
{"title":"ANALYSIS OF WING SEPARATION AND MID-AIR BREAKUP IN LIGHT TRAINING AIRCRAFT","authors":"M. Hirabayashi","doi":"10.3846/aviation.2021.15953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite increasing discussions concerning the recently published wing spar airworthiness directive (AD) that affects many training aircraft and several current ADs for wing struts, there remains limited objective literature on incidents of wing separation or mid-air breakup. This paper attempts to report and analyse instances of wing separation and mid-air breakup of light training aircraft. A careful review of the United States National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) aircraft accident database revealed that wing separations were more likely occur as mid-air breakup in PA28s than 172s/182s (OR: 3.06, 95 % CI: 1.3682 to 6.8536, p = .008). Additionally, wing separations were less likely to occur as mid-air breakups in the strutted 172s/182s than 177s/210s that don’t have a wing strut (OR: 0.11, 95 % CI: 0.04 to 0.29, p = <.001). This implies that non-strutted wing designs may be more susceptability to mid-air breakup than the strutted design of similar aircraft.","PeriodicalId":51910,"journal":{"name":"Aviation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aviation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3846/aviation.2021.15953","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite increasing discussions concerning the recently published wing spar airworthiness directive (AD) that affects many training aircraft and several current ADs for wing struts, there remains limited objective literature on incidents of wing separation or mid-air breakup. This paper attempts to report and analyse instances of wing separation and mid-air breakup of light training aircraft. A careful review of the United States National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) aircraft accident database revealed that wing separations were more likely occur as mid-air breakup in PA28s than 172s/182s (OR: 3.06, 95 % CI: 1.3682 to 6.8536, p = .008). Additionally, wing separations were less likely to occur as mid-air breakups in the strutted 172s/182s than 177s/210s that don’t have a wing strut (OR: 0.11, 95 % CI: 0.04 to 0.29, p = <.001). This implies that non-strutted wing designs may be more susceptability to mid-air breakup than the strutted design of similar aircraft.
轻型教练机机翼分离与空中解体分析
尽管最近发布的影响许多训练飞机的翼梁适航指令(AD)和一些当前的机翼支柱适航指令(AD)引起了越来越多的讨论,但关于机翼分离或空中破裂事件的客观文献仍然有限。本文试图报道和分析轻型教练机机翼分离和空中解体的实例。对美国国家运输安全委员会(NTSB)飞机事故数据库的仔细审查显示,pa28比172 /182更容易在空中解体时发生机翼分离(OR: 3.06, 95% CI: 1.3682至6.8536,p = 0.008)。此外,与没有机翼支柱的177s/210s相比,有支柱的177s/ 182s在空中解体时发生机翼分离的可能性更小(OR: 0.11, 95% CI: 0.04至0.29,p = < 0.001)。这意味着非支撑翼设计可能比类似飞机的支撑翼设计更容易受到半空破裂的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Aviation
Aviation ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: CONCERNING THE FOLLOWING FIELDS OF RESEARCH: ▪ Flight Physics ▪ Air Traffic Management ▪ Aerostructures ▪ Airports ▪ Propulsion ▪ Human Factors ▪ Aircraft Avionics, Systems and Equipment ▪ Air Transport Technologies and Development ▪ Flight Mechanics ▪ History of Aviation ▪ Integrated Design and Validation (method and tools) Besides, it publishes: short reports and notes, reviews, reports about conferences and workshops
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信