Religious Moderation of Islamic Religious Education Teacher in Pekanbaru City Against Minority of Islamic Mazhab

Z. Achmad, M. Rahmat, A. Kosasih
{"title":"Religious Moderation of Islamic Religious Education Teacher in Pekanbaru City Against Minority of Islamic Mazhab","authors":"Z. Achmad, M. Rahmat, A. Kosasih","doi":"10.35445/alishlah.v15i2.3168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research aims to determine the religious moderation of Islamic religious education (PAI) teachers towards minority Islamic schools of thought. Quantitative research methods, data collection techniques with questionnaires, and data analysis are descriptive-analytic with percentages (%). Three aspects are examined: views on majority Muslims, Shia Islam, and Ahmadiyya, each netted with seven items (total of 21 items). All items have high validity (minimum alpha 0.05) and high reliability (r = 0.94 significant at alpha 0.01). Respondents to the study were 78 high school PAI teachers in the city of Pekanbaru. The study's results showed that most of the Pekanbaru PAI teachers failed to maintain Islamic moderation. They also failed to become preservers of Sunni Islam, which is moderate towards Shia and Ahmadiyya. If this attitude also occurs among Islamic Religious Education teachers in other areas, it is only natural that most students and university students are intolerant of Muslim minorities. Researchers recommend looking for learning models to eliminate negative prejudices and develop religious moderation among Muslims from different schools of thought.","PeriodicalId":32470,"journal":{"name":"AlIshlah Jurnal Pendidikan","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AlIshlah Jurnal Pendidikan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i2.3168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The research aims to determine the religious moderation of Islamic religious education (PAI) teachers towards minority Islamic schools of thought. Quantitative research methods, data collection techniques with questionnaires, and data analysis are descriptive-analytic with percentages (%). Three aspects are examined: views on majority Muslims, Shia Islam, and Ahmadiyya, each netted with seven items (total of 21 items). All items have high validity (minimum alpha 0.05) and high reliability (r = 0.94 significant at alpha 0.01). Respondents to the study were 78 high school PAI teachers in the city of Pekanbaru. The study's results showed that most of the Pekanbaru PAI teachers failed to maintain Islamic moderation. They also failed to become preservers of Sunni Islam, which is moderate towards Shia and Ahmadiyya. If this attitude also occurs among Islamic Religious Education teachers in other areas, it is only natural that most students and university students are intolerant of Muslim minorities. Researchers recommend looking for learning models to eliminate negative prejudices and develop religious moderation among Muslims from different schools of thought.
北干巴鲁市伊斯兰教宗教教育教师对伊斯兰教少数民族马扎布的宗教节制
本研究旨在确定伊斯兰宗教教育(PAI)教师对少数民族伊斯兰学派的宗教节制。定量研究方法、问卷数据收集技术和数据分析均为描述性分析,百分比(%)。研究了三个方面:对多数穆斯林、什叶派伊斯兰教和艾哈迈迪亚的看法,每个方面都有七个项目(共21个项目)。所有项目都具有较高的有效性(最小α0.05)和较高的可靠性(α0.01时r=0.94显著)。该研究的受访者是佩坎巴鲁市的78名高中PAI教师。研究结果表明,大多数Pekanbaru PAI教师未能保持伊斯兰温和。他们也未能成为逊尼派伊斯兰教的捍卫者,逊尼派伊斯兰教对什叶派和艾哈迈迪亚持温和态度。如果这种态度也发生在其他地区的伊斯兰宗教教育教师中,那么大多数学生和大学生对穆斯林少数民族的不容忍是很自然的。研究人员建议在不同思想流派的穆斯林中寻找消除负面偏见和发展宗教节制的学习模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
407
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信