A Database by Any Other Name: Instructor Language Preferences for Library Resources

IF 1.9 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Brittany O'Neill, A. LeBlanc
{"title":"A Database by Any Other Name: Instructor Language Preferences for Library Resources","authors":"Brittany O'Neill, A. LeBlanc","doi":"10.1080/13614533.2022.2095290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study explored the language preferences of instructors at Louisiana State University for library resources and whether library terminology influenced those choices. Participants were presented with both screen captures and definitions of electronic library resources and were asked to identify them in their own words. Faculty did not use library terminology consistently and performed better when presented with a definition than with a screen capture. No correlation was found between rank, teaching experience, college, or attendance in library instruction and preference for library terminology. A statistically significant relationship existed between frequent use of library resources and preference for library terminology. Confusion about this terminology could create difficulties for faculty in conducting their own research and may confuse their students when they hear conflicting language from their instructors and librarians. Librarians should use clear language, provide context on websites, and provide instruction on these resources specifically catered to instructors.","PeriodicalId":38971,"journal":{"name":"New Review of Academic Librarianship","volume":"29 1","pages":"174 - 188"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Review of Academic Librarianship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2022.2095290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This study explored the language preferences of instructors at Louisiana State University for library resources and whether library terminology influenced those choices. Participants were presented with both screen captures and definitions of electronic library resources and were asked to identify them in their own words. Faculty did not use library terminology consistently and performed better when presented with a definition than with a screen capture. No correlation was found between rank, teaching experience, college, or attendance in library instruction and preference for library terminology. A statistically significant relationship existed between frequent use of library resources and preference for library terminology. Confusion about this terminology could create difficulties for faculty in conducting their own research and may confuse their students when they hear conflicting language from their instructors and librarians. Librarians should use clear language, provide context on websites, and provide instruction on these resources specifically catered to instructors.
任何其他名称的数据库:图书馆资源的讲师语言偏好
摘要本研究探讨了路易斯安那州立大学教师对图书馆资源的语言偏好,以及图书馆术语是否影响了他们的选择。向参与者展示了屏幕截图和电子图书馆资源的定义,并要求他们用自己的话来识别它们。教师没有一致地使用图书馆术语,并且在提供定义时比提供屏幕截图时表现更好。职级、教学经验、大学或出席图书馆教学与图书馆术语偏好无相关性。频繁使用图书馆资源与图书馆术语偏好之间存在统计学上显著的关系。对这个术语的混淆可能会给教师进行自己的研究带来困难,当他们从教师和图书管理员那里听到相互矛盾的语言时,也可能会让学生感到困惑。图书馆员应该使用清晰的语言,在网站上提供上下文,并提供专门针对教师的这些资源的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
New Review of Academic Librarianship
New Review of Academic Librarianship Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信