Assessment of nasopharynx area and level of severity posterior crossbite on children with cleft lips and palate post-palatoplasty

Anie Apriani, R. Primarti, A. Kasim, F. Oscandar
{"title":"Assessment of nasopharynx area and level of severity posterior crossbite on children with cleft lips and palate post-palatoplasty","authors":"Anie Apriani, R. Primarti, A. Kasim, F. Oscandar","doi":"10.24198/pjd.vol32no2.17951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Many children with post palatoplasty had crossbite posterior. This study was aimed to assess the nasopharynx area and the posterior crossbite severity level of children with cleft lip and palate (CLP) who received palatoplasty treatment compared to normal children. Methods: The study was observational analytic. The research subject was 14 children with CLP post-palatoplasty and 14 normal children. The object of research was 28 study models and secondary data of lateral cephalometric radiograph of children with CLP post palatoplasty and normal children. The measurement of PTM-ad1-Ad2-PTM and PTM-So-Ba-PTM were used to measure the nasopharyngeal area. Study models were assessed to analyse the level of severity of posterior crossbite. Results: The average of the soft tissues (the nasopharynx) area children with CLP post-palatoplasty was 35.02 mm2, which was lower than the normal child (35.73 mm2). Similarly, the average of the hard tissues (the nasopharynx) area children with CLP post-palatoplasty was 301.40 mm2, which was smaller than the normal children (315.54 mm2). Statistical analysis of the nasopharynx area resulted in non-significant difference. All children with CLP post-palatoplasty was suffered from posterior crossbite. The level of severity posterior crossbite, which was categorised as good was 42.9%, poor criteria was 35.7%, moderate criteria was 14.3%, and very good criteria was 7.1%. Conclusion: There is no difference between the average size of the nasopharynx area on children with CLP post-palatoplasty and normal children. The level of severity posterior crossbite after palatoplasty in CLP children mostly included in the good criteria.","PeriodicalId":31757,"journal":{"name":"Padjadjaran Journal of Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Padjadjaran Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24198/pjd.vol32no2.17951","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction: Many children with post palatoplasty had crossbite posterior. This study was aimed to assess the nasopharynx area and the posterior crossbite severity level of children with cleft lip and palate (CLP) who received palatoplasty treatment compared to normal children. Methods: The study was observational analytic. The research subject was 14 children with CLP post-palatoplasty and 14 normal children. The object of research was 28 study models and secondary data of lateral cephalometric radiograph of children with CLP post palatoplasty and normal children. The measurement of PTM-ad1-Ad2-PTM and PTM-So-Ba-PTM were used to measure the nasopharyngeal area. Study models were assessed to analyse the level of severity of posterior crossbite. Results: The average of the soft tissues (the nasopharynx) area children with CLP post-palatoplasty was 35.02 mm2, which was lower than the normal child (35.73 mm2). Similarly, the average of the hard tissues (the nasopharynx) area children with CLP post-palatoplasty was 301.40 mm2, which was smaller than the normal children (315.54 mm2). Statistical analysis of the nasopharynx area resulted in non-significant difference. All children with CLP post-palatoplasty was suffered from posterior crossbite. The level of severity posterior crossbite, which was categorised as good was 42.9%, poor criteria was 35.7%, moderate criteria was 14.3%, and very good criteria was 7.1%. Conclusion: There is no difference between the average size of the nasopharynx area on children with CLP post-palatoplasty and normal children. The level of severity posterior crossbite after palatoplasty in CLP children mostly included in the good criteria.
唇腭裂术后儿童鼻咽部面积及严重程度的评价
前言:许多儿童腭裂术后出现后牙合。本研究旨在评估接受腭裂(CLP)治疗的儿童与正常儿童相比鼻咽面积和后牙合严重程度。方法:采用观察分析方法。研究对象为14例CLP腭裂术后患儿和14例正常患儿。研究对象为腭裂术后患儿和正常患儿的28个研究模型和侧位头x线片资料。采用PTM-ad1-Ad2-PTM和PTM-So-Ba-PTM测定鼻咽面积。对研究模型进行评估,分析后牙合的严重程度。结果:CLP腭裂术后患儿鼻咽部软组织面积平均为35.02 mm2,低于正常患儿(35.73 mm2)。同样,CLP腭裂术后患儿硬组织(鼻咽部)面积平均为301.40 mm2,小于正常患儿(315.54 mm2)。鼻咽部面积统计分析差异无统计学意义。所有CLP腭裂术后患儿均出现后牙合。后牙合严重程度为良好的占42.9%,较差的占35.7%,中度的占14.3%,良好的占7.1%。结论:CLP腭裂术后患儿鼻咽面积的平均大小与正常患儿无明显差异。CLP患儿腭成形术后后牙合严重程度多纳入良标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
3 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信