Implementation of Specifications Grading in an Upper-Division Chemical Biology Lecture Course

Jessica I. Kelz, Jose L. Uribe, M. Rasekh, Gemma R. Takahashi, Wyeth Gibson, Renée D. Link, K. McKnelly, Rachel W. Martin
{"title":"Implementation of Specifications Grading in an Upper-Division Chemical Biology Lecture Course","authors":"Jessica I. Kelz, Jose L. Uribe, M. Rasekh, Gemma R. Takahashi, Wyeth Gibson, Renée D. Link, K. McKnelly, Rachel W. Martin","doi":"10.35459/tbp.2022.000239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Specifications grading is a student-centered assessment method that enables flexibility and opportunities for revision. Here, we describe the first known full implementation of specifications grading in an upper-division chemical biology course. Due to the rapid development of relevant knowledge in this discipline, the overarching goal of this class is to prepare students to interpret and communicate about current research. In the past, a conventional points-based assessment method made it challenging to ensure that satisfactory standards for student work were consistently met, particularly for comprehensive written assignments. Specifications grading was chosen because the core tenet requires students to demonstrate minimum learning objectives to achieve a passing grade and complete more content of increased cognitive complexity to achieve higher grades. This strict adherence to determining grades based on demonstrated skills is balanced by opportunities for revision or flexibility in assignment deadlines. These options are made manageable for the instructors through the use of a token economy with a limited number of tokens that students can choose to use when needed. Over the duration of the course, a validated survey on self-efficacy showed slight positive trends, student comprehension and demonstrated skills qualitatively improved, and final grade distributions were not negatively affected. Instructors noticed that discussions with students were more focused on course concepts and feedback, rather than grades, while overall grading time was reduced. Responses to university-administered student feedback surveys revealed some self-reported reduction in anxiety, as well as increased confidence in managing time and course material. Recommendations are provided on how to continue to improve the overall teaching and learning experience for both instructors and students.","PeriodicalId":72403,"journal":{"name":"Biophysicist (Rockville, Md.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biophysicist (Rockville, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35459/tbp.2022.000239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Specifications grading is a student-centered assessment method that enables flexibility and opportunities for revision. Here, we describe the first known full implementation of specifications grading in an upper-division chemical biology course. Due to the rapid development of relevant knowledge in this discipline, the overarching goal of this class is to prepare students to interpret and communicate about current research. In the past, a conventional points-based assessment method made it challenging to ensure that satisfactory standards for student work were consistently met, particularly for comprehensive written assignments. Specifications grading was chosen because the core tenet requires students to demonstrate minimum learning objectives to achieve a passing grade and complete more content of increased cognitive complexity to achieve higher grades. This strict adherence to determining grades based on demonstrated skills is balanced by opportunities for revision or flexibility in assignment deadlines. These options are made manageable for the instructors through the use of a token economy with a limited number of tokens that students can choose to use when needed. Over the duration of the course, a validated survey on self-efficacy showed slight positive trends, student comprehension and demonstrated skills qualitatively improved, and final grade distributions were not negatively affected. Instructors noticed that discussions with students were more focused on course concepts and feedback, rather than grades, while overall grading time was reduced. Responses to university-administered student feedback surveys revealed some self-reported reduction in anxiety, as well as increased confidence in managing time and course material. Recommendations are provided on how to continue to improve the overall teaching and learning experience for both instructors and students.
高年级化学生物学讲座课程规范评分的实施
规范评分是一种以学生为中心的评估方法,具有灵活性和修改机会。在这里,我们描述了已知的第一个在高等化学生物学课程中全面实施规范评分。由于该学科相关知识的快速发展,本课程的首要目标是让学生做好解释和交流当前研究的准备。过去,传统的基于分数的评估方法很难确保学生作业始终达到令人满意的标准,尤其是综合书面作业。之所以选择规范评分,是因为核心原则要求学生展示最低的学习目标以获得及格成绩,并完成更多认知复杂性增加的内容以获得更高的成绩。这种严格遵守根据所展示的技能来确定成绩的做法,与修改或灵活安排任务期限的机会相平衡。通过使用代币经济,使教师可以管理这些选项,学生可以在需要时选择使用数量有限的代币。在课程期间,一项经过验证的自我效能感调查显示,学生的理解力和表现出的技能有了质的提高,期末成绩分布没有受到负面影响。讲师们注意到,与学生的讨论更多地集中在课程概念和反馈上,而不是分数上,同时总体评分时间减少了。对大学管理的学生反馈调查的回应显示,自我报告的焦虑有所减少,对管理时间和课程材料的信心也有所增强。就如何继续改善教师和学生的整体教学体验提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信