Ultrasound-guided posterior transversus abdominis plane block versus epidural analgesia for postoperative pain relief in lower abdominal surgeries

Q4 Medicine
Arnab Das, Kunal Tiwari, S. Sharma, Shalendra Singh, S. Patnaik, Nimish Gaur
{"title":"Ultrasound-guided posterior transversus abdominis plane block versus epidural analgesia for postoperative pain relief in lower abdominal surgeries","authors":"Arnab Das, Kunal Tiwari, S. Sharma, Shalendra Singh, S. Patnaik, Nimish Gaur","doi":"10.4103/jmedsci.jmedsci_11_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Among the regional anesthesia techniques used for postoperative analgesia for lower abdominal surgeries, epidural analgesia (EA) has been the gold standard and time-tested technique, but complications and contraindications for the same warrant the need for other equally good analgesic techniques. Aim: The present study compared posterior transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block to EA for postoperative analgesic efficacy in patients undergoing lower abdominal surgeries. Methods: Prospective, observational study in patients undergoing lower abdominal surgeries under general anesthesia. Patients received ultrasound-guided (USG) 20 ml 0.2% ropivacaine each side in TAP block (Group A, n = 50) or 10 ml of 0.2% ropivacaine was administered in epidural (Group B; n = 50) before extubation. The Visual analog scale (VAS) score, hemodynamic parameters, and ill effects were recorded. Results: The blood pressure was significantly lower in first 6 h of block in Group B. VAS score was significantly lower in Group A in first 6 h of surgery. It was observed that a significantly higher number of patients in the Group B required rescue analgesic and at higher dosages. Postoperative nausea and vomiting were found in 32% of Group B and 22% of Group A patients. Conclusion: TAP block has almost no complications, keeps the patient more hemodynamically stable, and offers a better early postoperative analgesia when compared to EA in patients undergoing lower abdominal surgeries.","PeriodicalId":39900,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Sciences (Taiwan)","volume":"43 1","pages":"74 - 78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Sciences (Taiwan)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmedsci.jmedsci_11_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Among the regional anesthesia techniques used for postoperative analgesia for lower abdominal surgeries, epidural analgesia (EA) has been the gold standard and time-tested technique, but complications and contraindications for the same warrant the need for other equally good analgesic techniques. Aim: The present study compared posterior transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block to EA for postoperative analgesic efficacy in patients undergoing lower abdominal surgeries. Methods: Prospective, observational study in patients undergoing lower abdominal surgeries under general anesthesia. Patients received ultrasound-guided (USG) 20 ml 0.2% ropivacaine each side in TAP block (Group A, n = 50) or 10 ml of 0.2% ropivacaine was administered in epidural (Group B; n = 50) before extubation. The Visual analog scale (VAS) score, hemodynamic parameters, and ill effects were recorded. Results: The blood pressure was significantly lower in first 6 h of block in Group B. VAS score was significantly lower in Group A in first 6 h of surgery. It was observed that a significantly higher number of patients in the Group B required rescue analgesic and at higher dosages. Postoperative nausea and vomiting were found in 32% of Group B and 22% of Group A patients. Conclusion: TAP block has almost no complications, keeps the patient more hemodynamically stable, and offers a better early postoperative analgesia when compared to EA in patients undergoing lower abdominal surgeries.
超声引导下后横腹平面阻滞与硬膜外镇痛对下腹部手术术后疼痛的缓解作用
背景:在用于下腹部手术术后镇痛的区域麻醉技术中,硬膜外镇痛(EA)一直是金标准和经过时间考验的技术,但其并发症和禁忌症证明需要其他同样好的镇痛技术。目的:比较后腹横面阻滞与EA对下腹部手术患者术后镇痛效果的影响。方法:对全麻下腹部手术患者进行前瞻性观察性研究。患者在超声引导下(USG)在TAP阻滞中每侧给予0.2%罗哌卡因20 ml (A组,n = 50)或硬膜外给予0.2%罗哌卡因10 ml (B组;N = 50)拔管前。记录视觉模拟评分(VAS)、血流动力学参数及不良反应。结果:b组患者手术前6小时血压明显降低,A组患者手术前6小时VAS评分明显降低。我们观察到,B组患者需要更高剂量的抢救性镇痛药的人数明显增加。术后恶心呕吐发生率为32%,A组为22%。结论:与EA相比,TAP阻滞几乎没有并发症,使患者血流动力学更稳定,并能提供更好的术后早期镇痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Sciences (Taiwan)
Journal of Medical Sciences (Taiwan) Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信