Experimental Investigation on Mechanical Properties of Lightweight Aggregate Concrete

IF 1.1 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
A. D. Kumar, P. Poluraju, Hanuma Kasagani
{"title":"Experimental Investigation on Mechanical Properties of Lightweight Aggregate Concrete","authors":"A. D. Kumar, P. Poluraju, Hanuma Kasagani","doi":"10.2478/cee-2022-0061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This present research work mainly focusses on an investigation of the workability and strength properties of lightweight aggregates, particularly Palm oil shell and pumice aggregate, used in the production of concrete with (PA) and (POS), which were substituted for conventional Hard Broken Stone (HBG) coarse aggregate. Through the use of lightweight aggregate (POS and PA) in place of some of the coarse aggregate, the properties of a lightweight concrete M30 have been concentrated in this experimental study. The lab tests that were conducted include the compaction factor test, Schmidt Hammer test (rebound hammer test), and compressive strength. A total of 108 numbers of cube specimen were employed of size 2400 kg/m3. As part of a parametric study, the total number of cube specimens was divided into two groups according to various percentages: palm oil shell and pumice aggregate. In order to cast the cube specimens, dry weight of coarse aggregate was substituted for 0, 10 %, 20 %, 30 %, 40 %, and 50 % of POS and PA lightweight aggregate, respectively. A total of 9 cube specimens were cast and tested for 3, 7, and 28 days after successful curing in order to obtain accurate results. Average values were obtained from the test program and are shown in the corresponding Tables. Slump, compaction factor, rebound hammer compressive strength, and compressive strength values with different amounts of light aggregate were used to assess how well concrete performed when coarse aggregate was partially replaced with light aggregate. The test findings revealed that when the amount of conventional aggregates substituted by POS and PA increased, the slump test, compaction factor test, and strength of the lightweight aggregate concrete (LWAC) rapidly diminished. With an increase in the amount of aggregates replaced by POS and PA, the LWAC’s absorption has gradually increased as water. It is stated at the outset that the POS has shown to perform better than the PA when construction is done using structural lightweight concrete.","PeriodicalId":42034,"journal":{"name":"Civil and Environmental Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Civil and Environmental Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/cee-2022-0061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract This present research work mainly focusses on an investigation of the workability and strength properties of lightweight aggregates, particularly Palm oil shell and pumice aggregate, used in the production of concrete with (PA) and (POS), which were substituted for conventional Hard Broken Stone (HBG) coarse aggregate. Through the use of lightweight aggregate (POS and PA) in place of some of the coarse aggregate, the properties of a lightweight concrete M30 have been concentrated in this experimental study. The lab tests that were conducted include the compaction factor test, Schmidt Hammer test (rebound hammer test), and compressive strength. A total of 108 numbers of cube specimen were employed of size 2400 kg/m3. As part of a parametric study, the total number of cube specimens was divided into two groups according to various percentages: palm oil shell and pumice aggregate. In order to cast the cube specimens, dry weight of coarse aggregate was substituted for 0, 10 %, 20 %, 30 %, 40 %, and 50 % of POS and PA lightweight aggregate, respectively. A total of 9 cube specimens were cast and tested for 3, 7, and 28 days after successful curing in order to obtain accurate results. Average values were obtained from the test program and are shown in the corresponding Tables. Slump, compaction factor, rebound hammer compressive strength, and compressive strength values with different amounts of light aggregate were used to assess how well concrete performed when coarse aggregate was partially replaced with light aggregate. The test findings revealed that when the amount of conventional aggregates substituted by POS and PA increased, the slump test, compaction factor test, and strength of the lightweight aggregate concrete (LWAC) rapidly diminished. With an increase in the amount of aggregates replaced by POS and PA, the LWAC’s absorption has gradually increased as water. It is stated at the outset that the POS has shown to perform better than the PA when construction is done using structural lightweight concrete.
轻骨料混凝土力学性能试验研究
摘要本研究工作主要集中在研究轻质骨料,特别是棕榈油壳和浮石骨料的工作性能和强度特性,这些骨料用于生产含有(PA)和(POS)的混凝土,以取代传统的硬碎石(HBG)粗骨料。通过使用轻骨料(POS和PA)代替一些粗骨料,本试验研究集中研究了M30轻质混凝土的性能。进行的实验室试验包括压实系数试验、施密特锤试验(回弹锤试验)和抗压强度。总共使用了108个尺寸为2400 kg/m3的立方体试样。作为参数研究的一部分,立方体试样的总数根据不同的百分比分为两组:棕榈油壳和浮石骨料。为了铸造立方体试样,粗集料的干重分别代替了0、10%、20%、30%、40%和50%的POS和PA轻集料。为了获得准确的结果,在成功固化后的3、7和28天内,共铸造和测试了9个立方体试样。平均值从测试程序中获得,并显示在相应的表中。使用坍落度、压实系数、回弹锤抗压强度和不同轻骨料量的抗压强度值来评估粗骨料部分替换为轻骨料时混凝土的性能。试验结果表明,当POS和PA取代的常规骨料用量增加时,轻骨料混凝土(LWAC)的坍落度试验、压实系数试验和强度迅速降低。随着POS和PA取代的骨料数量的增加,LWAC的吸收量逐渐增加。一开始就指出,当使用结构轻质混凝土进行施工时,POS的性能优于PA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
58.30%
发文量
69
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信