The Role of Rationality and Technological Change in Learning Process

Harisa Mardiana, H. K. Daniels
{"title":"The Role of Rationality and Technological Change in Learning Process","authors":"Harisa Mardiana, H. K. Daniels","doi":"10.31960/ijolec.v1i2.64","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"My goal in examining the role of rationality and technological change in the learning process is to investigate knowledge, the use of technology, especially in the classroom and belief from lecturers in following the changes in learning. The problems in Indonesia are that lecturers have difficulty in adopting technology and indeed need improvement, and some lecturers are even weak in technological knowledge, development of knowledge, lecturer’s belief that the lecturer will never be able to change which will be complicated education on Indonesian campuses. The method used in this research is a quantitative method and is supported by a semi qualitative method using a Likert scale. Data collection was taken from 129 respondents who as lecturers spread throughout Indonesia from January 2018 to early May 2018; questionnaires were distributed using Google Form via email, Whatsapp, Facebook Messenger. The result of this study is that there is a relationship between rationality and technological change in the learning process. The author found small changes from several lecturers in using technology, even though technology became one of the tools in learning. Changes in the lecturers believe that they are difficult to adopt technology due to old age.","PeriodicalId":32963,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Learning Education and Counseling","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Learning Education and Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31960/ijolec.v1i2.64","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

My goal in examining the role of rationality and technological change in the learning process is to investigate knowledge, the use of technology, especially in the classroom and belief from lecturers in following the changes in learning. The problems in Indonesia are that lecturers have difficulty in adopting technology and indeed need improvement, and some lecturers are even weak in technological knowledge, development of knowledge, lecturer’s belief that the lecturer will never be able to change which will be complicated education on Indonesian campuses. The method used in this research is a quantitative method and is supported by a semi qualitative method using a Likert scale. Data collection was taken from 129 respondents who as lecturers spread throughout Indonesia from January 2018 to early May 2018; questionnaires were distributed using Google Form via email, Whatsapp, Facebook Messenger. The result of this study is that there is a relationship between rationality and technological change in the learning process. The author found small changes from several lecturers in using technology, even though technology became one of the tools in learning. Changes in the lecturers believe that they are difficult to adopt technology due to old age.
理性与技术变革在学习过程中的作用
我研究理性和技术变革在学习过程中的作用的目的是调查知识、技术的使用,尤其是在课堂上,以及讲师对学习变革的信念。印尼的问题是,讲师很难采用技术,确实需要改进,有些讲师甚至在技术知识、知识发展、讲师认为讲师永远无法改变等方面都很薄弱,这将是印尼校园的复杂教育。本研究中使用的方法是一种定量方法,并得到了使用Likert量表的半定性方法的支持。数据收集自2018年1月至2018年5月初在印度尼西亚各地担任讲师的129名受访者;调查问卷使用谷歌表单通过电子邮件、Whatsapp、Facebook Messenger进行分发。本研究的结果是,在学习过程中,理性与技术变革之间存在关系。作者发现,几位讲师在使用技术方面发生了微小的变化,尽管技术已经成为学习的工具之一。讲师们的变化认为,由于年龄大,他们很难采用技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信