Neural patterns of threat response in adolescents predict vulnerability for and resilience against internalizing symptoms during COVID-19 waves

Q4 Neuroscience
Anna Tyborowska , Yvonne van den Berg , Mahur M. Hashemi , Hannah C.M. Niermann , Antonius H.N. Cillessen , Ivan Toni , Karin Roelofs
{"title":"Neural patterns of threat response in adolescents predict vulnerability for and resilience against internalizing symptoms during COVID-19 waves","authors":"Anna Tyborowska ,&nbsp;Yvonne van den Berg ,&nbsp;Mahur M. Hashemi ,&nbsp;Hannah C.M. Niermann ,&nbsp;Antonius H.N. Cillessen ,&nbsp;Ivan Toni ,&nbsp;Karin Roelofs","doi":"10.1016/j.ynirp.2023.100177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Defensive stress reactions, such as freezing and active fight-or-flight, are relevant for coping with threat. Action-preparatory activity supporting these reactions, including the amygdala, has been posited as a potential marker for stress-resilience. We considered the successive COVID-19 lockdowns as two pervasive stressors, to prospectively investigate the predictive value of neural threat-responses towards symptom development. Five years prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, 17-year-old adolescents (n = 64, Baseline-17) performed the fMRI-adapted Go/Nogo Under Threat (GUNT) task, where threat-anticipatory freezing reactions and transition to action are evoked to avoid a shock. A majority (n = 44) made themselves available for follow-up assessments before COVID (Baseline-20, age 20), during the first COVID-19 lockdown in the Netherlands (LD1, age 22.5), and during a second lockdown (LD2, age 23). The GUNT task quantified neural (thalamic, subcortical, amygdala) and physiological (bradycardia) markers of threat-anticipatory freezing and transition to action (mediated by anterior cingulate cortex). Threat-anticipatory amygdala responses (Baseline-17) were linked to stressor resilience, as quantified by self-reported anxiety symptoms between LD1 and LD2. However, stronger amygdala responses to low threat cues (Baseline-17) were associated with stronger anxiety symptoms. These effects occurred over and above early-life stress, COVID-19 stress burden, and overall symptom changes between age 17 and 20. These findings suggest that amygdala responses to acute threat provide a marker for resilience against real-life stressors, with adequate threat discrimination signaling resilience and stronger amygdala responses to low threat predicting vulnerability. The findings support the notion that neural responses to threat are instrumental for adaptive coping with pervasive stress.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74277,"journal":{"name":"Neuroimage. Reports","volume":"3 3","pages":"Article 100177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroimage. Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666956023000223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Defensive stress reactions, such as freezing and active fight-or-flight, are relevant for coping with threat. Action-preparatory activity supporting these reactions, including the amygdala, has been posited as a potential marker for stress-resilience. We considered the successive COVID-19 lockdowns as two pervasive stressors, to prospectively investigate the predictive value of neural threat-responses towards symptom development. Five years prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, 17-year-old adolescents (n = 64, Baseline-17) performed the fMRI-adapted Go/Nogo Under Threat (GUNT) task, where threat-anticipatory freezing reactions and transition to action are evoked to avoid a shock. A majority (n = 44) made themselves available for follow-up assessments before COVID (Baseline-20, age 20), during the first COVID-19 lockdown in the Netherlands (LD1, age 22.5), and during a second lockdown (LD2, age 23). The GUNT task quantified neural (thalamic, subcortical, amygdala) and physiological (bradycardia) markers of threat-anticipatory freezing and transition to action (mediated by anterior cingulate cortex). Threat-anticipatory amygdala responses (Baseline-17) were linked to stressor resilience, as quantified by self-reported anxiety symptoms between LD1 and LD2. However, stronger amygdala responses to low threat cues (Baseline-17) were associated with stronger anxiety symptoms. These effects occurred over and above early-life stress, COVID-19 stress burden, and overall symptom changes between age 17 and 20. These findings suggest that amygdala responses to acute threat provide a marker for resilience against real-life stressors, with adequate threat discrimination signaling resilience and stronger amygdala responses to low threat predicting vulnerability. The findings support the notion that neural responses to threat are instrumental for adaptive coping with pervasive stress.

Abstract Image

青少年威胁反应的神经模式可预测2019冠状病毒病浪潮期间内化症状的脆弱性和复原力
防御性压力反应,如冰冻和积极的战斗或逃跑,与应对威胁有关。支持这些反应的行动准备活动,包括杏仁核,被认为是压力恢复能力的潜在标志。我们将连续的新冠肺炎封锁视为两种普遍的压力源,以前瞻性地研究神经威胁反应对症状发展的预测价值。在新冠肺炎大流行的五年前,17岁青少年(n=64,基线17)执行了fMRI适应的“在威胁下去/不去”(GUNT)任务,在该任务中,引发威胁性冷冻反应并过渡到行动以避免休克。大多数人(n=44)在新冠肺炎之前(基线20,20岁)、荷兰第一次新冠肺炎封锁期间(LD1,22.5岁)和第二次封锁期间(LD 2,23岁)可进行后续评估。GUNT任务量化了神经(丘脑、皮质下、杏仁核)和生理(心动过缓)威胁预期冻结和向行动过渡的标志物(由前扣带皮层介导)。根据LD1和LD2之间自我报告的焦虑症状,威胁预期杏仁核反应(基线17)与压力源的恢复力有关。然而,杏仁核对低威胁提示的更强反应(基线17)与更强的焦虑症状有关。这些影响发生在17岁至20岁之间的早期压力、新冠肺炎压力负担和总体症状变化之上。这些发现表明,杏仁核对急性威胁的反应为抵御现实生活中的压力提供了一个标志,有足够的威胁辨别信号,表明有韧性,杏仁核对低威胁的反应更强,预测脆弱性。这些发现支持了这样一种观点,即对威胁的神经反应有助于适应性应对普遍的压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuroimage. Reports
Neuroimage. Reports Neuroscience (General)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
87 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信