Humanist algorithms for COVID-19 vaccines' distribution and its impact on business economics in the post-pandemic future

IF 7.1 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Jaime Gil-Aluja , Jaime Gil-Lafuente , Martyna Nowak
{"title":"Humanist algorithms for COVID-19 vaccines' distribution and its impact on business economics in the post-pandemic future","authors":"Jaime Gil-Aluja ,&nbsp;Jaime Gil-Lafuente ,&nbsp;Martyna Nowak","doi":"10.1016/j.iedeen.2021.100173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As the world is fighting against the continuous spread of the COVID-Sars-2 virus and the consequences the pandemic has brought about on economic, political and societal levels, the emergence of the vaccination programs seems to be the biggest hope for a quick return to, popularly called, the “new normal”.</p><p>As it is not feasible to vaccinate at the same time the whole population, the states, provinces and cities had arranged – though, admittedly, taking into consideration limited numbers of criteria - homogenous groups of citizens, who, labelled as “risk groups”, have been chosen as those who will be receiving the vaccination before others, adding to the already existing feelings of chaos and shortage.</p><p>We want to address the issue that despite the access to the expertise and knowledge of intradisciplinary committees, we still do not have a satisfactory answer regarding the further steps for the vaccination programs. We believe it is due to the persistence of the binary way of reasoning, with its tendency to overlook the complexity of the issue and emphasize objectivity while neglecting the subjective factors that cannot be easily quantified.</p><p>For that very reason, we propose the application of the theories of uncertainty with the support of the fuzzy subset theory, which will result in the creation of the humanist algorithms of clustering of populations, allotment of different kinds of vaccine for diverse persons in the groups and, finally, ranking for the priority of vaccination. This approach will allow designing a vaccination model to that will allow to maintain, to the highest possible level, the principles of ethics, morale and solidarity, and efficiency and effectiveness.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45796,"journal":{"name":"European Research on Management and Business Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444883421000322/pdfft?md5=7915f52c958537a81104243becc39b5a&pid=1-s2.0-S2444883421000322-main.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Research on Management and Business Economics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444883421000322","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

As the world is fighting against the continuous spread of the COVID-Sars-2 virus and the consequences the pandemic has brought about on economic, political and societal levels, the emergence of the vaccination programs seems to be the biggest hope for a quick return to, popularly called, the “new normal”.

As it is not feasible to vaccinate at the same time the whole population, the states, provinces and cities had arranged – though, admittedly, taking into consideration limited numbers of criteria - homogenous groups of citizens, who, labelled as “risk groups”, have been chosen as those who will be receiving the vaccination before others, adding to the already existing feelings of chaos and shortage.

We want to address the issue that despite the access to the expertise and knowledge of intradisciplinary committees, we still do not have a satisfactory answer regarding the further steps for the vaccination programs. We believe it is due to the persistence of the binary way of reasoning, with its tendency to overlook the complexity of the issue and emphasize objectivity while neglecting the subjective factors that cannot be easily quantified.

For that very reason, we propose the application of the theories of uncertainty with the support of the fuzzy subset theory, which will result in the creation of the humanist algorithms of clustering of populations, allotment of different kinds of vaccine for diverse persons in the groups and, finally, ranking for the priority of vaccination. This approach will allow designing a vaccination model to that will allow to maintain, to the highest possible level, the principles of ethics, morale and solidarity, and efficiency and effectiveness.

COVID-19疫苗分配的人本主义算法及其对大流行后未来商业经济的影响
随着世界正在与covid -2病毒的持续传播以及大流行对经济,政治和社会层面带来的后果作斗争,疫苗接种计划的出现似乎是迅速恢复所谓的“新常态”的最大希望。由于不可能在所有人口同时接种疫苗,各州、各省和各市安排了——虽然,不可否认,考虑到有限数量的标准——被称为“危险群体”的同质公民群体被选为先于其他人接种疫苗的群体,这加剧了已经存在的混乱和短缺的感觉。我们想要解决的问题是,尽管我们获得了跨学科委员会的专业知识和知识,但对于疫苗接种计划的进一步步骤,我们仍然没有一个令人满意的答案。我们认为,这是由于二元推理方式的持续存在,其倾向于忽视问题的复杂性,强调客观性,而忽视了不易量化的主观因素。因此,我们建议在模糊子集理论的支持下应用不确定性理论,这将导致创建以人为本的群体聚类算法,为群体中不同的人分配不同种类的疫苗,最后对疫苗接种的优先级进行排序。这一方法将有助于设计一种疫苗接种模式,使道德、士气和团结以及效率和效果的原则保持在尽可能高的水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
3.40%
发文量
30
审稿时长
50 weeks
期刊介绍: European Research on Management and Business Economics (ERMBE) was born in 1995 as Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa (IEDEE). The journal is published by the European Academy of Management and Business Economics (AEDEM) under this new title since 2016, it was indexed in SCOPUS in 2012 and in Thomson Reuters Emerging Sources Citation Index in 2015. From the beginning, the aim of the Journal is to foster academic research by publishing original research articles that meet the highest analytical standards, and provide new insights that contribute and spread the business management knowledge
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信