Diagnostic dilemma in a patient presenting with thrombotic microangiopathy in the setting of pregnancy

IF 0.8 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
M. Jiffry, M. Ahmed-khan, Felipe Carmona Pires, Nkechi A Okam, Mahnoor Hanif
{"title":"Diagnostic dilemma in a patient presenting with thrombotic microangiopathy in the setting of pregnancy","authors":"M. Jiffry, M. Ahmed-khan, Felipe Carmona Pires, Nkechi A Okam, Mahnoor Hanif","doi":"10.22551/2022.34.0901.10199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract We report a case of thrombotic microangiopathy in a postpartum female for which considerable diagnostic uncertainty existed initially regarding the etiology. This case highlights the limitations surrounding PLASMIC scoring criteria for the diagnosis of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP). A 32-year-old woman presented to maternofetal medicine in her third trimester of pregnancy at 32 weeks for a routine follow up and was subsequently found to have elevated blood pressures with proteinuria, and was diagnosed with pre-eclampsia. Worsening anemia and thrombocytopenia prompted a blood smear which showed schistocytes, concerning for a thrombotic microangiopathy. Creatinine was also elevated with normal liver enzymes being noted. A PLASMIC score of 4 placed her in the low-risk category for severe ADAMTS13 deficiency whilst she fulfilled criteria for partial HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelets) syndrome per Tennessee classification. Despite delivery, her symptoms persisted with subsequent ADAMTS13 assay confirming acquired TTP, subsequently requiring repeated plasmapheresis and rituximab to achieve disease control. Thrombotic microangiopathy remains a diagnostic challenge especially in the peripartum population, and scoring systems such as PLASMIC score and Tennessee classification may be of limited utility.","PeriodicalId":72274,"journal":{"name":"Archive of clinical cases","volume":"9 1","pages":"24 - 28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archive of clinical cases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22551/2022.34.0901.10199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract We report a case of thrombotic microangiopathy in a postpartum female for which considerable diagnostic uncertainty existed initially regarding the etiology. This case highlights the limitations surrounding PLASMIC scoring criteria for the diagnosis of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP). A 32-year-old woman presented to maternofetal medicine in her third trimester of pregnancy at 32 weeks for a routine follow up and was subsequently found to have elevated blood pressures with proteinuria, and was diagnosed with pre-eclampsia. Worsening anemia and thrombocytopenia prompted a blood smear which showed schistocytes, concerning for a thrombotic microangiopathy. Creatinine was also elevated with normal liver enzymes being noted. A PLASMIC score of 4 placed her in the low-risk category for severe ADAMTS13 deficiency whilst she fulfilled criteria for partial HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelets) syndrome per Tennessee classification. Despite delivery, her symptoms persisted with subsequent ADAMTS13 assay confirming acquired TTP, subsequently requiring repeated plasmapheresis and rituximab to achieve disease control. Thrombotic microangiopathy remains a diagnostic challenge especially in the peripartum population, and scoring systems such as PLASMIC score and Tennessee classification may be of limited utility.
一例妊娠期血栓性微血管病患者的诊断困境
摘要我们报告了一例产后女性血栓性微血管病,其病因最初存在相当大的诊断不确定性。该病例强调了血浆评分标准在血栓性血小板减少性紫癜(TTP)诊断中的局限性。一名32岁的妇女在妊娠晚期32周时接受了母体药物治疗,随后被发现血压升高并伴有蛋白尿,并被诊断为先兆子痫。贫血和血小板减少的恶化促使血液涂片显示分裂细胞,这与血栓性微血管病有关。肌酸也升高,同时注意到正常的肝酶。血浆评分为4分,属于严重ADAMTS13缺乏症的低风险类别,同时符合田纳西州分类的部分HELLP(溶血、肝酶升高和低血小板)综合征标准。尽管分娩,她的症状仍然存在,随后的ADAMTS13检测证实了获得性TTP,随后需要反复进行血浆置换和利妥昔单抗以实现疾病控制。血栓性微血管病仍然是一个诊断挑战,尤其是在围产期人群中,血浆评分和田纳西分类等评分系统的效用可能有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信