Good practices in COVID-19 risk reduction adopted by Australian construction enterprises

IF 1.9 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
K. Seneviratne, S. Perera, B. Ginigaddara, X. Jin, Liyaning Tang, Robert Osei Kyei
{"title":"Good practices in COVID-19 risk reduction adopted by Australian construction enterprises","authors":"K. Seneviratne, S. Perera, B. Ginigaddara, X. Jin, Liyaning Tang, Robert Osei Kyei","doi":"10.1108/bepam-10-2022-0154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis research investigated the impacts of COVID-19 on construction enterprises and good practices adopted by the enterprises in reducing COVID-19 risks. The Sendai Framework (TSF) is widely accepted as a strategic roadmap to reduce disaster risks throughout the life cycle of a disaster. As such, with the aim of enhancing the resilience of Australian construction enterprises, the identified good practices were mapped with TSF priorities to consolidate COVID-19 risk reduction practices that can be adopted by Australian construction enterprises.Design/methodology/approachCase study research approach was used, and three case studies were conducted with small, medium and large construction enterprises. Small, medium and large enterprises were selected based on the Australian Bureau of Statistics classification of the business size. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews conducted with three executive members from the three enterprises. Data were analysed using content analysis.FindingsThe study found that construction enterprises faced demand and supply side impacts. Infrastructure projects, funded by public sector clients and larger enterprises were least affected. Investments and demand for residential and other building projects were reduced by private sector clients, affecting small and medium enterprises. Findings also show that the construction enterprises adopted good practices in identifying, managing, investing on resilience and recovery that align with TSF priorities. All three enterprises agreed on some common good practices on risk identification, risk management and effective recovery. Different views were shared on investments related to disaster resilience.Practical implicationsThis study contributes to mitigate the COVID-19 impacts on construction enterprises and subsequent economic and social impacts.Originality/valueThis research found how Australian construction enterprises survived during COVID-19. The study adopted TSF to construction and COVID-19 context while consolidating COVID-19 risk reduction practices.","PeriodicalId":46426,"journal":{"name":"Built Environment Project and Asset Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Built Environment Project and Asset Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/bepam-10-2022-0154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis research investigated the impacts of COVID-19 on construction enterprises and good practices adopted by the enterprises in reducing COVID-19 risks. The Sendai Framework (TSF) is widely accepted as a strategic roadmap to reduce disaster risks throughout the life cycle of a disaster. As such, with the aim of enhancing the resilience of Australian construction enterprises, the identified good practices were mapped with TSF priorities to consolidate COVID-19 risk reduction practices that can be adopted by Australian construction enterprises.Design/methodology/approachCase study research approach was used, and three case studies were conducted with small, medium and large construction enterprises. Small, medium and large enterprises were selected based on the Australian Bureau of Statistics classification of the business size. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews conducted with three executive members from the three enterprises. Data were analysed using content analysis.FindingsThe study found that construction enterprises faced demand and supply side impacts. Infrastructure projects, funded by public sector clients and larger enterprises were least affected. Investments and demand for residential and other building projects were reduced by private sector clients, affecting small and medium enterprises. Findings also show that the construction enterprises adopted good practices in identifying, managing, investing on resilience and recovery that align with TSF priorities. All three enterprises agreed on some common good practices on risk identification, risk management and effective recovery. Different views were shared on investments related to disaster resilience.Practical implicationsThis study contributes to mitigate the COVID-19 impacts on construction enterprises and subsequent economic and social impacts.Originality/valueThis research found how Australian construction enterprises survived during COVID-19. The study adopted TSF to construction and COVID-19 context while consolidating COVID-19 risk reduction practices.
澳大利亚建筑企业降低新冠肺炎风险的良好做法
目的研究新型冠状病毒肺炎对建筑企业的影响,以及企业在降低新型冠状病毒肺炎风险方面采取的良好做法。仙台框架(TSF)被广泛接受为在灾害的整个生命周期内减少灾害风险的战略路线图。因此,为了增强澳大利亚建筑企业的抵御能力,已将确定的良好做法与可持续发展基金的优先事项相结合,以巩固澳大利亚建筑企业可采用的降低COVID-19风险的做法。设计/方法/方法采用案例研究的方法,对小型、中型和大型建筑企业进行了三个案例研究。小型、中型和大型企业是根据澳大利亚统计局对企业规模的分类来选择的。通过对三家企业的三名高管进行半结构化访谈来收集数据。数据采用内容分析法进行分析。研究发现,建筑企业面临着需求侧和供给侧的影响。由公共部门客户和大型企业资助的基础设施项目受到的影响最小。私营部门客户减少了对住宅和其他建筑项目的投资和需求,影响到中小型企业。调查结果还表明,建筑企业在识别、管理和投资适应力和恢复方面采取了良好的做法,这些做法与TSF的优先事项相一致。所有三家企业就风险识别、风险管理和有效恢复方面的一些共同良好做法达成一致。与会者对与抗灾能力有关的投资意见不一。实践意义本研究有助于缓解新冠肺炎疫情对建筑企业的影响以及后续的经济和社会影响。独创性/价值这项研究发现了澳大利亚建筑企业如何在COVID-19期间生存下来。该研究将TSF用于构建和COVID-19背景,同时巩固COVID-19风险降低实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信