Nereyda Falconi, Tomás A. Carlo, Todd K. Fuller, Stephen Destefano, John F. Organ
{"title":"Bear diets and human–bear conflicts: insights from isotopic ecology","authors":"Nereyda Falconi, Tomás A. Carlo, Todd K. Fuller, Stephen Destefano, John F. Organ","doi":"10.1111/mam.12285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Bears, Ursidae, are considered omnivores, except for giant pandas <i>Ailuropoda melanoleuca</i> and polar bears <i>Ursus maritimus</i>. However, omnivory includes a wide range of dietary variation and trophic positions, making bear dietary ecology unclear. We inferred bear trophic positions from δ<sup>15</sup>N (‰) values and examined their correlation with diets reported in the literature, including frequency of human–bear conflicts (livestock predation and crop damage incidents). Overall, <sup>15</sup>N signatures were consistent with diet estimates. Bear species with higher <sup>15</sup>N signatures differed more from each other, including cases of large regional intraspecific variance, than bear species with lower <sup>15</sup>N signatures. Bear trophic position and frequency of reports of human–bear conflicts were uncorrelated, suggesting that livestock predation by bears is an opportunistic behaviour rather than a response to food availability dynamics.</p>","PeriodicalId":49893,"journal":{"name":"Mammal Review","volume":"52 3","pages":"322-327"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mammal Review","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/mam.12285","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Bears, Ursidae, are considered omnivores, except for giant pandas Ailuropoda melanoleuca and polar bears Ursus maritimus. However, omnivory includes a wide range of dietary variation and trophic positions, making bear dietary ecology unclear. We inferred bear trophic positions from δ15N (‰) values and examined their correlation with diets reported in the literature, including frequency of human–bear conflicts (livestock predation and crop damage incidents). Overall, 15N signatures were consistent with diet estimates. Bear species with higher 15N signatures differed more from each other, including cases of large regional intraspecific variance, than bear species with lower 15N signatures. Bear trophic position and frequency of reports of human–bear conflicts were uncorrelated, suggesting that livestock predation by bears is an opportunistic behaviour rather than a response to food availability dynamics.
期刊介绍:
Mammal Review is the official scientific periodical of the Mammal Society, and covers all aspects of mammalian biology and ecology, including behavioural ecology, biogeography, conservation, ecology, ethology, evolution, genetics, human ecology, management, morphology, and taxonomy. We publish Reviews drawing together information from various sources in the public domain for a new synthesis or analysis of mammalian biology; Predictive Reviews using quantitative models to provide insights into mammalian biology; Perspectives presenting original views on any aspect of mammalian biology; Comments in response to papers published in Mammal Review; and Short Communications describing new findings or methods in mammalian biology.