Influence of Canahua and Quinoa Wholemeals on Properties of Non-Fermented Wheat Dough

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
I. Švec, M. Hrušková, R. Kapačinskaitė, T. Hofmanová
{"title":"Influence of Canahua and Quinoa Wholemeals on Properties of Non-Fermented Wheat Dough","authors":"I. Švec, M. Hrušková, R. Kapačinskaitė, T. Hofmanová","doi":"10.2478/sab-2019-0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The study compares the influence of wheat flour replacement by 10 or 20 wt% of quinoa and canahua wholemeals on wheat dough technological quality and rheological properties. The technological quality of wheat flour was affected in terms of protein quality and amylases activity, associated with a high dietary fibre content of both tested non-traditional materials. A farinograph test revealed that quinoa partially increased water absorption; a higher amount of water resulted in the shortened stability of dough consistency during mixing and its weakened cohesiveness at the end of the test. The effect of canahua was unequivocal – water absorption decreased, stability was prolonged properly, but dough softening increased. An extensigraph test confirmed a positive effect of alternative crops on dough elasticity, but in general, the composite dough with 20% of canahua or quinoa showed worsened machinability. Multivariate statistical methods proved a stronger effect when quinoa was analysed solely than when added at complete samples a set, while for canahua-wheat samples the result was opposite.","PeriodicalId":53537,"journal":{"name":"Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/sab-2019-0031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The study compares the influence of wheat flour replacement by 10 or 20 wt% of quinoa and canahua wholemeals on wheat dough technological quality and rheological properties. The technological quality of wheat flour was affected in terms of protein quality and amylases activity, associated with a high dietary fibre content of both tested non-traditional materials. A farinograph test revealed that quinoa partially increased water absorption; a higher amount of water resulted in the shortened stability of dough consistency during mixing and its weakened cohesiveness at the end of the test. The effect of canahua was unequivocal – water absorption decreased, stability was prolonged properly, but dough softening increased. An extensigraph test confirmed a positive effect of alternative crops on dough elasticity, but in general, the composite dough with 20% of canahua or quinoa showed worsened machinability. Multivariate statistical methods proved a stronger effect when quinoa was analysed solely than when added at complete samples a set, while for canahua-wheat samples the result was opposite.
Canahua和Quinoa全麦对未发酵小麦面团性质的影响
本文比较了用10%或20%的藜麦和加拿大全麦代替小麦粉对小麦面团工艺质量和流变性能的影响。小麦粉的工艺质量受到蛋白质质量和淀粉酶活性的影响,这与两种测试的非传统材料的高膳食纤维含量有关。粉质测试显示藜麦部分增加了吸水率;较高的水量导致面团在混合过程中稠度的稳定性缩短,并且在测试结束时其内聚性减弱。卡纳华的效果是明确的——吸水率降低,稳定性适当延长,但面团软化度增加。一项延伸图测试证实了替代作物对面团弹性的积极影响,但总的来说,含有20%卡纳瓦或藜麦的复合面团显示出较差的可加工性。多元统计方法证明,单独分析藜麦比在一组完整样本中添加藜麦效果更强,而对于加拿大小麦样本,结果则相反。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica
Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all)
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信