[A Reappraisal of Pain Using a Nurses' Professional Study Circle].

Q3 Nursing
Li-Chuan Kuo, Wan-Hsiang Wang, Yen-Chen Lee
{"title":"[A Reappraisal of Pain Using a Nurses' Professional Study Circle].","authors":"Li-Chuan Kuo, Wan-Hsiang Wang, Yen-Chen Lee","doi":"10.6224/JN.202206_69(3).08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nPain relates to the highly personal and subjective experience of feelings and emotions. Patients are often misunderstood because of language-related limitations and the conditions of their disease.\n\n\nPURPOSE\nIn this research, a professional study circle was held to help nurses reconstruct their understanding of patient pain to enhance their awareness / empathy for differences in pain perception between others and themselves and to improve their ability to provide professional, individualized care.\n\n\nMETHODS\nNine nurses were invited from the urology department to join the developed professional study circle. We spent one year and a half reading \"Listening to Pain: Finding Words, Compassion, and Relief\" and held a sharing and discussion roundtable meeting every month. The study circle included: (1) assigned reading and the appointment of a leader on rotation to direct the sharing and discussion, (2) presentation of clinical cases related to the reading, (3) discussions of how to apply what they had learned in clinical practice, and (4) an interview of study circle members and a full analysis of their reflections and changes of view regarding pain perceptions.\n\n\nRESULTS\nAfter a close reading and guided discussions, these nine nurses began to change their perceptions of pain and, in general, passed through three stages, including: (1) cast doubt on the authenticity of patient expressions of pain because of stereotyped biases; (2) develop a new empathy based on careful listening; (3) providing individualized care and experiencing professional growth. After successfully transiting through these stages, the nurses held a more profound understanding of their patients, practiced a more sensitive use of language, and reflected an enhanced professional ability to assess pain.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS / IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE\nThis professional study circle successfully helped the nurses internalize a more empathetic understanding of pain and exhibit greater skill in designing individualized care for their patients.","PeriodicalId":35672,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing","volume":"69 3 1","pages":"50-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6224/JN.202206_69(3).08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Pain relates to the highly personal and subjective experience of feelings and emotions. Patients are often misunderstood because of language-related limitations and the conditions of their disease. PURPOSE In this research, a professional study circle was held to help nurses reconstruct their understanding of patient pain to enhance their awareness / empathy for differences in pain perception between others and themselves and to improve their ability to provide professional, individualized care. METHODS Nine nurses were invited from the urology department to join the developed professional study circle. We spent one year and a half reading "Listening to Pain: Finding Words, Compassion, and Relief" and held a sharing and discussion roundtable meeting every month. The study circle included: (1) assigned reading and the appointment of a leader on rotation to direct the sharing and discussion, (2) presentation of clinical cases related to the reading, (3) discussions of how to apply what they had learned in clinical practice, and (4) an interview of study circle members and a full analysis of their reflections and changes of view regarding pain perceptions. RESULTS After a close reading and guided discussions, these nine nurses began to change their perceptions of pain and, in general, passed through three stages, including: (1) cast doubt on the authenticity of patient expressions of pain because of stereotyped biases; (2) develop a new empathy based on careful listening; (3) providing individualized care and experiencing professional growth. After successfully transiting through these stages, the nurses held a more profound understanding of their patients, practiced a more sensitive use of language, and reflected an enhanced professional ability to assess pain. CONCLUSIONS / IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE This professional study circle successfully helped the nurses internalize a more empathetic understanding of pain and exhibit greater skill in designing individualized care for their patients.
[使用护士专业研究圈重新评估疼痛]。
背景疼痛与高度个人化和主观的感受和情绪体验有关。由于与语言相关的限制和疾病的状况,患者经常被误解。目的在这项研究中,举办了一个专业研究圈,帮助护士重建他们对患者疼痛的理解,以增强他们对他人和自己之间疼痛感知差异的意识/同理心,并提高他们提供专业、个性化护理的能力。方法邀请泌尿外科的一线护士加入发达的专业学习圈。我们花了一年半的时间阅读《倾听痛苦:寻找话语、同情和解脱》,并每月举行一次分享和讨论圆桌会议。研究圈包括:(1)指定阅读并任命一名轮流领导来指导分享和讨论,(2)介绍与阅读相关的临床案例,(3)讨论如何将所学应用于临床实践,以及(4)采访研究圈成员,并全面分析他们对疼痛感知的反思和观点变化。结果经过仔细阅读和指导讨论,这九名护士开始改变他们对疼痛的看法,总体上经历了三个阶段,包括:(1)由于刻板偏见而对患者疼痛表达的真实性产生怀疑;(2) 在认真倾听的基础上培养新的同理心;(3) 提供个性化护理并体验专业成长。在成功度过这些阶段后,护士们对患者有了更深刻的理解,对语言的使用更加敏感,并反映出评估疼痛的专业能力得到了增强。结论/实践意义这个专业研究圈子成功地帮助护士内化了对疼痛的更具同理心的理解,并在为患者设计个性化护理方面表现出更高的技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Nursing
Journal of Nursing Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信