Emotional reflexivity in the time of COVID-19: working-class emotional practices

IF 1.6 Q3 SOCIOLOGY
M. Holmes, R. Thomson
{"title":"Emotional reflexivity in the time of COVID-19: working-class emotional practices","authors":"M. Holmes, R. Thomson","doi":"10.1332/263168922x16680946441057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We share findings from a qualitative study on emotions in Scottish working-class households during lockdown. The results challenge existing research focused on emotional capital, which often suggests that working-class people struggle to provide emotional resources to those close to them. Using the concept of emotional reflexivity we show how these household members cared for each other’s feelings, challenging deficit views of working-class emotionality. This research offers a novel understanding of working-class participants collaboratively making space for each other to feel, many favouring acts of care rather than talking. The COVID-19 lockdown, however, tended to reinforce gendered practices of emotion work, although some participants drew on emotional support beyond the household to try to mitigate this burden. The emotionally reflexive practices seen in these households suggest that sustaining more equality in emotional wellbeing relies on navigating material circumstances, is not always about verbal sharing, is often an interactional achievement, but also means resisting unrealistic expectations of intimate relationships within households as the fountainhead of all emotional succour.","PeriodicalId":29742,"journal":{"name":"Emotions and Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emotions and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/263168922x16680946441057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We share findings from a qualitative study on emotions in Scottish working-class households during lockdown. The results challenge existing research focused on emotional capital, which often suggests that working-class people struggle to provide emotional resources to those close to them. Using the concept of emotional reflexivity we show how these household members cared for each other’s feelings, challenging deficit views of working-class emotionality. This research offers a novel understanding of working-class participants collaboratively making space for each other to feel, many favouring acts of care rather than talking. The COVID-19 lockdown, however, tended to reinforce gendered practices of emotion work, although some participants drew on emotional support beyond the household to try to mitigate this burden. The emotionally reflexive practices seen in these households suggest that sustaining more equality in emotional wellbeing relies on navigating material circumstances, is not always about verbal sharing, is often an interactional achievement, but also means resisting unrealistic expectations of intimate relationships within households as the fountainhead of all emotional succour.
新冠肺炎时期的情绪自反性:工人阶级的情绪实践
我们分享了一项关于封锁期间苏格兰工薪阶层家庭情绪的定性研究结果。这一结果挑战了现有的专注于情感资本的研究,该研究通常表明,工薪阶层很难为身边的人提供情感资源。利用情感自反性的概念,我们展示了这些家庭成员是如何关心彼此的感受的,挑战了对工人阶级情感缺失的看法。这项研究提供了一种新的理解,即工人阶级参与者合作为彼此创造感受的空间,许多人倾向于关心而不是交谈。然而,新冠肺炎封锁往往会加强情感工作的性别化实践,尽管一些参与者利用家庭以外的情感支持来试图减轻这种负担。在这些家庭中看到的情感反射实践表明,在情感幸福感方面保持更多的平等依赖于驾驭物质环境,并不总是口头分享,通常是一种互动成就,但也意味着抵制家庭内部亲密关系作为所有情感援助源泉的不切实际的期望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信