Erick Breathwaite, J. Weaver, Angela C Murchison, Michelle L Treadwell, J. Odanga, Jung Bok Lee
{"title":"Scaffold-free bioprinted osteogenic and chondrogenic systems to model osteochondral physiology","authors":"Erick Breathwaite, J. Weaver, Angela C Murchison, Michelle L Treadwell, J. Odanga, Jung Bok Lee","doi":"10.1088/1748-605X/ab4243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Three-dimensional bioprinted culture platforms mimic the native microenvironment of tissues more accurately than two-dimensional cell cultures or animal models. Scaffold-free bioprinting eliminates many complications associated with traditional scaffold-dependent printing as well as provides better cell-to-cell interactions and long-term functionality. In this study, constructs were produced from bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) using a scaffold-free bioprinter. These constructs were cultured in either osteogenic, chondrogenic, a 50:50 mixture of osteogenic and chondrogenic (‘osteo-chondro’), or BM-MSC growth medium. Osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation capacity was determined over an 8-week culture period using histological and immunohistochemical staining and RT-qPCR (Phase I). After 6 weeks in culture, individual osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiated constructs were adhered to create a bone-cartilage interaction model. Adhered differentiated constructs were cultured for an additional 8 weeks in either chondrogenic or osteo-chondro medium to evaluate sustainability of lineage specification and transdifferentiation potential (Phase II). Constructs cultured in their respective osteogenic and/or chondrogenic medium differentiated directly into bone (model of intramembranous ossification) or cartilage. Positive histological and immunohistochemical staining for bone or cartilage identification was shown after 4 and 8 weeks in culture. Expression of osteogenesis and chondrogenesis associated genes increased between weeks 2 and 6. Adhered individual osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiated constructs sustained their differentiated phenotype when cultured in chondrogenic medium. However, adhered individual chondrogenic differentiated constructs cultured in osteo-chondro medium were converted to bone (model of metaplastic transformation). These bioprinted models of bone-cartilage interaction, intramembranous ossification, and metaplastic transformation of cartilage into bone offer a useful and promising approach for bone and cartilage tissue engineering research. Specifically, these models can be potentially used as functional tissue systems for studying osteochondral defect repair, drug discovery and response, and many other potential applications.","PeriodicalId":9016,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical materials","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1088/1748-605X/ab4243","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605X/ab4243","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Abstract
Three-dimensional bioprinted culture platforms mimic the native microenvironment of tissues more accurately than two-dimensional cell cultures or animal models. Scaffold-free bioprinting eliminates many complications associated with traditional scaffold-dependent printing as well as provides better cell-to-cell interactions and long-term functionality. In this study, constructs were produced from bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) using a scaffold-free bioprinter. These constructs were cultured in either osteogenic, chondrogenic, a 50:50 mixture of osteogenic and chondrogenic (‘osteo-chondro’), or BM-MSC growth medium. Osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation capacity was determined over an 8-week culture period using histological and immunohistochemical staining and RT-qPCR (Phase I). After 6 weeks in culture, individual osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiated constructs were adhered to create a bone-cartilage interaction model. Adhered differentiated constructs were cultured for an additional 8 weeks in either chondrogenic or osteo-chondro medium to evaluate sustainability of lineage specification and transdifferentiation potential (Phase II). Constructs cultured in their respective osteogenic and/or chondrogenic medium differentiated directly into bone (model of intramembranous ossification) or cartilage. Positive histological and immunohistochemical staining for bone or cartilage identification was shown after 4 and 8 weeks in culture. Expression of osteogenesis and chondrogenesis associated genes increased between weeks 2 and 6. Adhered individual osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiated constructs sustained their differentiated phenotype when cultured in chondrogenic medium. However, adhered individual chondrogenic differentiated constructs cultured in osteo-chondro medium were converted to bone (model of metaplastic transformation). These bioprinted models of bone-cartilage interaction, intramembranous ossification, and metaplastic transformation of cartilage into bone offer a useful and promising approach for bone and cartilage tissue engineering research. Specifically, these models can be potentially used as functional tissue systems for studying osteochondral defect repair, drug discovery and response, and many other potential applications.
期刊介绍:
The goal of the journal is to publish original research findings and critical reviews that contribute to our knowledge about the composition, properties, and performance of materials for all applications relevant to human healthcare.
Typical areas of interest include (but are not limited to):
-Synthesis/characterization of biomedical materials-
Nature-inspired synthesis/biomineralization of biomedical materials-
In vitro/in vivo performance of biomedical materials-
Biofabrication technologies/applications: 3D bioprinting, bioink development, bioassembly & biopatterning-
Microfluidic systems (including disease models): fabrication, testing & translational applications-
Tissue engineering/regenerative medicine-
Interaction of molecules/cells with materials-
Effects of biomaterials on stem cell behaviour-
Growth factors/genes/cells incorporated into biomedical materials-
Biophysical cues/biocompatibility pathways in biomedical materials performance-
Clinical applications of biomedical materials for cell therapies in disease (cancer etc)-
Nanomedicine, nanotoxicology and nanopathology-
Pharmacokinetic considerations in drug delivery systems-
Risks of contrast media in imaging systems-
Biosafety aspects of gene delivery agents-
Preclinical and clinical performance of implantable biomedical materials-
Translational and regulatory matters