Work and Espoused National Cultural Values of Generation Z in Austria

K. Aldjic, W. Farrell
{"title":"Work and Espoused National Cultural Values of Generation Z in Austria","authors":"K. Aldjic, W. Farrell","doi":"10.15421/192210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Employers face the challenge of preparing for a new, upcoming generational cohort that is different in its expectations of the workplace, which goes hand-in-hand with its values. Therefore, Generation Z in Austria must receive detailed attention because it will make up a significant proportion of the workforce in the future. Questions will emerge about how to recruit this cohort or how to retain them. This research fills this gap by analyzing their espoused national cultural values and corresponding work values while considering the implications of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. \nDesign/Method/Approach: This quantitative research surveyed 137 Austrians from Generation Z. \nFindings: The results show a low Power Distance score, concluding that Austrian Generation Z does not prefer unequally distributed power; a low preference for Collectivism, a higher preference for Uncertainty Avoidance, and lower Masculinity. In terms of work values, Austrian Generation Z demonstrated the strongest preference for intrinsic and social rewards and emphasized the importance of offering benefits such as remote work opportunities and flexibility in scheduling work. \nTheoretical Implications: This study shows that espoused national cultural values impact work values in the context of Austrian Gen Z. Thus, both the espoused national cultural framework and the work values framework can be considered suitable for investigating values differences. \nPractical Implications: Human Resources practices should be adapted to successfully recruit and retain Austrian Generation Z. \nOriginality/Value: This research is among the early attempts to not only understand how espoused national cultural values and COVID impact the work values of Generation Z in Austria. \nResearch Limitations/Future Research: The smaller sample size and the over representation of females impact the extent to which findings can be generalized to all of Generation Z in Austria. Future research should expand the sample within Austria and internationally. \nAcknowledgments: This paper is the further development of the first author's thesis. Thank you to all of those who contributed to and supported these efforts. \n Paper type: Empirical","PeriodicalId":32724,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Management Issues","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Management Issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15421/192210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose: Employers face the challenge of preparing for a new, upcoming generational cohort that is different in its expectations of the workplace, which goes hand-in-hand with its values. Therefore, Generation Z in Austria must receive detailed attention because it will make up a significant proportion of the workforce in the future. Questions will emerge about how to recruit this cohort or how to retain them. This research fills this gap by analyzing their espoused national cultural values and corresponding work values while considering the implications of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Design/Method/Approach: This quantitative research surveyed 137 Austrians from Generation Z. Findings: The results show a low Power Distance score, concluding that Austrian Generation Z does not prefer unequally distributed power; a low preference for Collectivism, a higher preference for Uncertainty Avoidance, and lower Masculinity. In terms of work values, Austrian Generation Z demonstrated the strongest preference for intrinsic and social rewards and emphasized the importance of offering benefits such as remote work opportunities and flexibility in scheduling work. Theoretical Implications: This study shows that espoused national cultural values impact work values in the context of Austrian Gen Z. Thus, both the espoused national cultural framework and the work values framework can be considered suitable for investigating values differences. Practical Implications: Human Resources practices should be adapted to successfully recruit and retain Austrian Generation Z. Originality/Value: This research is among the early attempts to not only understand how espoused national cultural values and COVID impact the work values of Generation Z in Austria. Research Limitations/Future Research: The smaller sample size and the over representation of females impact the extent to which findings can be generalized to all of Generation Z in Austria. Future research should expand the sample within Austria and internationally. Acknowledgments: This paper is the further development of the first author's thesis. Thank you to all of those who contributed to and supported these efforts.  Paper type: Empirical
奥地利Z世代的工作和国家文化价值观
目的:雇主面临着为即将到来的新一代人做准备的挑战,这一代人对工作场所的期望与他们的价值观是不同的。因此,奥地利的Z世代必须得到详细的关注,因为他们将在未来的劳动力中占很大比例。如何招募这批人或如何留住他们的问题将会出现。本研究通过分析他们所信奉的民族文化价值观和相应的工作价值观,同时考虑到新冠肺炎大流行的影响,填补了这一空白。设计/方法/途径:这项定量研究调查了137名来自Z世代的奥地利人。研究发现:结果显示,奥地利Z世代的权力距离得分较低,表明他们不喜欢权力分配不均;集体主义偏好低,不确定性规避偏好高,男性气质较低。在工作价值观方面,奥地利Z世代表现出对内在和社会奖励的强烈偏好,并强调提供远程工作机会和灵活安排工作等福利的重要性。理论启示:本研究表明,在奥地利z世代背景下,所信奉的国家文化价值观对工作价值观产生了影响,因此,所信奉的国家文化框架和工作价值观框架都可以被认为适合于调查价值观差异。实践意义:人力资源实践应适应成功招募和留住奥地利Z世代。原创性/价值:本研究是早期尝试之一,不仅要了解所信奉的国家文化价值观和COVID如何影响奥地利Z世代的工作价值观。研究局限/未来研究:较小的样本量和女性的过度代表性影响了研究结果可以推广到奥地利所有Z世代的程度。未来的研究应扩大奥地利和国际范围内的样本。致谢:本文是第一作者论文的进一步发展。感谢所有为这些努力做出贡献和支持的人。论文类型:Empirical
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信