Do we train how we play? Investigating skill patterns in Australian football

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Danielle Ireland, B. Dawson, P. Peeling, L. Lester, J. Heasman, B. Rogalski
{"title":"Do we train how we play? Investigating skill patterns in Australian football","authors":"Danielle Ireland, B. Dawson, P. Peeling, L. Lester, J. Heasman, B. Rogalski","doi":"10.1080/24733938.2019.1595111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objectives: To examine the frequency of task-constraints between game-scenario training drills and competition games for all disposals, by considering, temporal, distance, pressure and related situational factors. Methods: The skill patterns of elite-level Australian football players (n = 33) were compared relative to playing environment (training/games), disposal type (handballs/kicks), and further categorised by ‘state of play’ factors. Results: Game measures relating to high-intensity pressure applied to the ball-carrier and receiving players were significantly under-represented during training, particularly for kicks (all p < 0.001). Physical pressure acts such as tackling were more frequent in games (p < 0.001). Further, kicks executed in 0-1 s also occurred more frequently in games compared to training (p < 0.001). For handballs, most (8/9) constraint frequencies were higher at training than in games (p < 0.03–0.001). Conclusion: It is likely that for training to more closely resemble games, ball-disposals (especially kicking) must be produced under highly contested conditions and executed within minimal time. These findings may enhance current training practices in the Australian football league, as well as assist in the development and prescription of innovative training drills to better prepare players for the specific game demands they experience.","PeriodicalId":48512,"journal":{"name":"Science and Medicine in Football","volume":"3 1","pages":"265 - 274"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/24733938.2019.1595111","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science and Medicine in Football","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24733938.2019.1595111","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objectives: To examine the frequency of task-constraints between game-scenario training drills and competition games for all disposals, by considering, temporal, distance, pressure and related situational factors. Methods: The skill patterns of elite-level Australian football players (n = 33) were compared relative to playing environment (training/games), disposal type (handballs/kicks), and further categorised by ‘state of play’ factors. Results: Game measures relating to high-intensity pressure applied to the ball-carrier and receiving players were significantly under-represented during training, particularly for kicks (all p < 0.001). Physical pressure acts such as tackling were more frequent in games (p < 0.001). Further, kicks executed in 0-1 s also occurred more frequently in games compared to training (p < 0.001). For handballs, most (8/9) constraint frequencies were higher at training than in games (p < 0.03–0.001). Conclusion: It is likely that for training to more closely resemble games, ball-disposals (especially kicking) must be produced under highly contested conditions and executed within minimal time. These findings may enhance current training practices in the Australian football league, as well as assist in the development and prescription of innovative training drills to better prepare players for the specific game demands they experience.
我们训练比赛方式吗?澳大利亚足球技术模式调查
摘要:目的:通过考虑时间、距离、压力和相关情境因素,研究游戏-情景训练演习和竞赛游戏中所有处置的任务约束频率。方法:对33名澳大利亚优秀足球运动员的技术模式进行比较,包括比赛环境(训练/比赛)、处置方式(手球/踢球),并进一步按“比赛状态”因素进行分类。结果:在训练中,与持球者和接球者施加高强度压力相关的比赛测量明显不足,特别是踢球(均p < 0.001)。身体压力行为,如抢断,在游戏中更为频繁(p < 0.001)。此外,与训练相比,0-1秒踢球在游戏中的发生频率也更高(p < 0.001)。对于手球,大多数(8/9)约束频率在训练中高于比赛(p < 0.03-0.001)。结论:为了使训练更接近于比赛,处理球(尤其是踢球)必须在高度竞争的条件下进行,并在最短的时间内完成。这些发现可能会加强目前澳大利亚足球联赛的训练实践,并有助于开发和处方创新的训练演习,以更好地为球员准备他们所经历的特定比赛要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
11.80%
发文量
69
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信