Gene-environment interaction study on the polygenic risk score for neuroticism, childhood adversity, and parental bonding.

Q3 Medicine
Personality Neuroscience Pub Date : 2023-08-04 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1017/pen.2023.2
Boris Klingenberg, Sinan Guloksuz, Lotta-Katrin Pries, Ozan Cinar, Claudia Menne-Lothmann, Jeroen Decoster, Ruud van Winkel, Dina Collip, Philippe Delespaul, Marc De Hert, Catherine Derom, Evert Thiery, Nele Jacobs, Marieke Wichers, Bochao D Lin, Jurjen Luykx, Jim van Os, Bart P F Rutten
{"title":"Gene-environment interaction study on the polygenic risk score for neuroticism, childhood adversity, and parental bonding.","authors":"Boris Klingenberg, Sinan Guloksuz, Lotta-Katrin Pries, Ozan Cinar, Claudia Menne-Lothmann, Jeroen Decoster, Ruud van Winkel, Dina Collip, Philippe Delespaul, Marc De Hert, Catherine Derom, Evert Thiery, Nele Jacobs, Marieke Wichers, Bochao D Lin, Jurjen Luykx, Jim van Os, Bart P F Rutten","doi":"10.1017/pen.2023.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study examines whether neuroticism is predicted by genetic vulnerability, summarized as polygenic risk score for neuroticism (PRS<sub><i>N</i></sub>), in interaction with bullying, parental bonding, and childhood adversity. Data were derived from a general population adolescent and young adult twin cohort. The final sample consisted of 202 monozygotic and 436 dizygotic twins and 319 twin pairs. The Short Eysenck Personality questionnaire was used to measure neuroticism. PRS<sub><i>N</i></sub> was trained on the results from the Genetics of Personality Consortium (GPC) and United Kingdom Biobank (UKB) cohorts, yielding two different PRS<sub><i>N</i></sub>. Multilevel mixed-effects models were used to analyze the main and interacting associations of PRS<sub><i>N</i></sub>, childhood adversity, bullying, and parental bonding style with neuroticism. We found no evidence of gene-environment correlation. PRS<sub><i>N</i></sub> thresholds of .005 and .2 were chosen, based on GPC and UKB datasets, respectively. After correction for confounders, all the individual variables were associated with the expression of neuroticism: both PRS<sub><i>N</i></sub> from GPC and UKB, childhood adversity, maternal bonding, paternal bonding, and bullying in primary school and secondary school. However, the results indicated no evidence for gene-environment interaction in this cohort. These results suggest that genetic vulnerability on the one hand and negative life events (childhood adversity and bullying) and positive life events (optimal parental bonding) on the other represent noninteracting pathways to neuroticism.</p>","PeriodicalId":36424,"journal":{"name":"Personality Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"e5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10725776/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/pen.2023.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study examines whether neuroticism is predicted by genetic vulnerability, summarized as polygenic risk score for neuroticism (PRSN), in interaction with bullying, parental bonding, and childhood adversity. Data were derived from a general population adolescent and young adult twin cohort. The final sample consisted of 202 monozygotic and 436 dizygotic twins and 319 twin pairs. The Short Eysenck Personality questionnaire was used to measure neuroticism. PRSN was trained on the results from the Genetics of Personality Consortium (GPC) and United Kingdom Biobank (UKB) cohorts, yielding two different PRSN. Multilevel mixed-effects models were used to analyze the main and interacting associations of PRSN, childhood adversity, bullying, and parental bonding style with neuroticism. We found no evidence of gene-environment correlation. PRSN thresholds of .005 and .2 were chosen, based on GPC and UKB datasets, respectively. After correction for confounders, all the individual variables were associated with the expression of neuroticism: both PRSN from GPC and UKB, childhood adversity, maternal bonding, paternal bonding, and bullying in primary school and secondary school. However, the results indicated no evidence for gene-environment interaction in this cohort. These results suggest that genetic vulnerability on the one hand and negative life events (childhood adversity and bullying) and positive life events (optimal parental bonding) on the other represent noninteracting pathways to neuroticism.

神经质、童年逆境和父母关系多基因风险评分的基因-环境交互研究
摘要本研究考察了在与欺凌、父母关系和童年逆境的相互作用中,神经质是否通过遗传脆弱性(概括为神经质的多基因风险评分(PRSN))来预测。数据来源于一般人群青少年和青年双胞胎队列。最终样本包括202对单卵双胞胎和436对双卵双胞胎以及319对双胞胎。采用Short-Eysenck人格问卷对神经质进行测量。PRSN是根据人格遗传学联合会(GPC)和英国生物库(UKB)队列的结果进行训练的,产生了两个不同的PRSN。多层次混合效应模型用于分析PRSN、童年逆境、欺凌和父母联系方式与神经质的主要关联和相互作用。我们没有发现基因与环境相关的证据。基于GPC和UKB数据集,分别选择了0.005和.2的PRSN阈值。在校正混杂因素后,所有个体变量都与神经质的表达有关:GPC和UKB的PRSN、童年逆境、母亲关系、父亲关系以及小学和中学的欺凌。然而,研究结果表明,该队列中没有基因-环境相互作用的证据。这些结果表明,一方面是遗传脆弱性,另一方面是负面生活事件(童年逆境和欺凌)和正面生活事件(最佳父母关系)代表了神经质的非交互途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Personality Neuroscience
Personality Neuroscience Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信