Model-based optimization of integrated purification sequences for biopharmaceuticals

Q1 Engineering
Chemical Engineering Science: X Pub Date : 2019-08-01 Epub Date: 2019-05-07 DOI:10.1016/j.cesx.2019.100025
Silvia M. Pirrung , Carmen Berends , Antoon H. Backx , Ruud F.W.C. van Beckhoven , Michel H.M. Eppink , Marcel Ottens
{"title":"Model-based optimization of integrated purification sequences for biopharmaceuticals","authors":"Silvia M. Pirrung ,&nbsp;Carmen Berends ,&nbsp;Antoon H. Backx ,&nbsp;Ruud F.W.C. van Beckhoven ,&nbsp;Michel H.M. Eppink ,&nbsp;Marcel Ottens","doi":"10.1016/j.cesx.2019.100025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Finding the best purification process is a challenging task. Recently, mechanistic models that can accelerate the development of chromatographic unit operations, the most important purification units, became widely available. In previous work, several chromatographic models have been linked together to simulate and optimize integrated processes. However, considering only chromatographic steps may lead to a suboptimal process. Consequently, the aim of this study was to include models for ultra- and diafiltration units into the optimization approach to account for buffer exchange steps before or between chromatography units. This approach was applied to an industrial case, the purification of a monoclonal antibody, where cation exchange, hydrophobic interaction and mixed mode were the possible chromatographic separation modes. It turned out that only the duration of the total filtration step and the duration of the ultrafiltration step were crucial variables for the optimization of the ultra- and diafiltration steps. The ‘best’ in silico purification process was found based on the performance criteria yield and solvent usage. The purity was required to be at least 99.9%.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37148,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Engineering Science: X","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100025"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cesx.2019.100025","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Engineering Science: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590140019300322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/5/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Finding the best purification process is a challenging task. Recently, mechanistic models that can accelerate the development of chromatographic unit operations, the most important purification units, became widely available. In previous work, several chromatographic models have been linked together to simulate and optimize integrated processes. However, considering only chromatographic steps may lead to a suboptimal process. Consequently, the aim of this study was to include models for ultra- and diafiltration units into the optimization approach to account for buffer exchange steps before or between chromatography units. This approach was applied to an industrial case, the purification of a monoclonal antibody, where cation exchange, hydrophobic interaction and mixed mode were the possible chromatographic separation modes. It turned out that only the duration of the total filtration step and the duration of the ultrafiltration step were crucial variables for the optimization of the ultra- and diafiltration steps. The ‘best’ in silico purification process was found based on the performance criteria yield and solvent usage. The purity was required to be at least 99.9%.

基于模型的生物制药集成纯化序列优化
寻找最佳的净化工艺是一项具有挑战性的任务。近年来,可以加速色谱单元(最重要的纯化单元)操作发展的机理模型变得广泛可用。在以前的工作中,几个色谱模型已经连接在一起来模拟和优化集成过程。然而,只考虑色谱步骤可能导致次优过程。因此,本研究的目的是将超滤和滤单元的模型纳入优化方法,以考虑色谱单元之前或之间的缓冲交换步骤。将该方法应用于单克隆抗体的纯化,其中阳离子交换、疏水相互作用和混合模式是可能的色谱分离模式。结果表明,只有总过滤步长和超滤步长是优化超滤步长和超滤步长的关键变量。根据性能标准、产率和溶剂用量,找到了最佳的硅净化工艺。纯度要求不低于99.9%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chemical Engineering Science: X
Chemical Engineering Science: X Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书