Nondestructive Testing of 3D Printed Fiber-Reinforced Polymeric Composites: An Experimental Critical Comparison.

IF 2.3 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING
3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing Pub Date : 2024-06-18 eCollection Date: 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1089/3dp.2022.0291
Henrique V Silva, Nuno P Catapirra, Marta S Carvalho, Telmo G Santos, Miguel A Machado
{"title":"Nondestructive Testing of 3D Printed Fiber-Reinforced Polymeric Composites: An Experimental Critical Comparison.","authors":"Henrique V Silva, Nuno P Catapirra, Marta S Carvalho, Telmo G Santos, Miguel A Machado","doi":"10.1089/3dp.2022.0291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Polymer matrix composite (PMC) materials produced by additive manufacturing are a promising solution with several applications in industry. The presence of defects due to fabrication could undermine the performance of the component structure. PMC performance has been extensively studied using destructive tests, but reliable nondestructive testing (NDT) techniques are essential. In this study, PMC with unidirectional fibers were 3D printed with an adapted conventional fused filament fabrication printer. The matrix material was polylactic acid, and three different reinforcement fibers were used: Kevlar<sup>®</sup>, carbon, and glass fibers. The samples were 3D printed with artificial defects, to simulate delamination's 0.5 mm thick. Four NDT techniques were explored, benchmarking the inspection of PMC envisaging an automated noncontact imaging inspection for easier result interpretation. Active pulse thermography, air-coupled ultrasounds, continuous wave terahertz, and digital X-ray were the techniques chosen, and a critical comparison is presented, evaluating the performance of each technique in the detection of defects. NDT technique diversity, complementarity, and redundancy improve inspection reliability, as there is not a single inspection technique that can cover all material defects or characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":54341,"journal":{"name":"3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11442158/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2022.0291","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Polymer matrix composite (PMC) materials produced by additive manufacturing are a promising solution with several applications in industry. The presence of defects due to fabrication could undermine the performance of the component structure. PMC performance has been extensively studied using destructive tests, but reliable nondestructive testing (NDT) techniques are essential. In this study, PMC with unidirectional fibers were 3D printed with an adapted conventional fused filament fabrication printer. The matrix material was polylactic acid, and three different reinforcement fibers were used: Kevlar®, carbon, and glass fibers. The samples were 3D printed with artificial defects, to simulate delamination's 0.5 mm thick. Four NDT techniques were explored, benchmarking the inspection of PMC envisaging an automated noncontact imaging inspection for easier result interpretation. Active pulse thermography, air-coupled ultrasounds, continuous wave terahertz, and digital X-ray were the techniques chosen, and a critical comparison is presented, evaluating the performance of each technique in the detection of defects. NDT technique diversity, complementarity, and redundancy improve inspection reliability, as there is not a single inspection technique that can cover all material defects or characteristics.

3D打印纤维增强聚合物复合材料的无损检测:实验临界比较
通过增材制造生产的聚合物基复合材料(PMC)是一种前景广阔的解决方案,在工业领域有多种应用。制造过程中出现的缺陷可能会影响组件结构的性能。对 PMC 性能的广泛研究使用的是破坏性测试,但可靠的无损检测(NDT)技术至关重要。在这项研究中,使用改装过的传统熔丝制造打印机对带有单向纤维的 PMC 进行了 3D 打印。基体材料为聚乳酸,并使用了三种不同的增强纤维:Kevlar® 纤维、碳纤维和玻璃纤维。样品在 3D 打印时带有人工缺陷,以模拟 0.5 毫米厚的分层。探索了四种无损检测技术,对 PMC 的检测进行了基准测试,设想进行自动非接触成像检测,以便更轻松地解读结果。我们选择了主动脉冲热成像、空气耦合超声波、连续波太赫兹和数字 X 射线技术,并对每种技术在检测缺陷方面的性能进行了严格的比较和评估。无损检测技术的多样性、互补性和冗余性提高了检测的可靠性,因为没有一种检测技术可以涵盖所有材料缺陷或特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing
3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing Materials Science-Materials Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.50%
发文量
126
期刊介绍: 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing is a peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for world-class research in additive manufacturing and related technologies. The Journal explores emerging challenges and opportunities ranging from new developments of processes and materials, to new simulation and design tools, and informative applications and case studies. Novel applications in new areas, such as medicine, education, bio-printing, food printing, art and architecture, are also encouraged. The Journal addresses the important questions surrounding this powerful and growing field, including issues in policy and law, intellectual property, data standards, safety and liability, environmental impact, social, economic, and humanitarian implications, and emerging business models at the industrial and consumer scales.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信