The portable community: place and displacement in bluegrass festival life

IF 0.7 Q3 GEOGRAPHY
K. Forbes-Boyte
{"title":"The portable community: place and displacement in bluegrass festival life","authors":"K. Forbes-Boyte","doi":"10.1080/08873631.2021.2006532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"origins, and meanings, questions about how people experience the landscape are never far removed from the book’s discussions. Some of the most provocative ideas come in the final three chapters, which address the ways in which the scenic landscape becomes bound up with transcendent space and the implications of this. One concern involves how the scenic landscape works to deceive. Unlike radical and Marxist cultural geographers who highlight the ways that scenic landscapes disguise labor and power relations, Olwig focuses on deception via the illusion of what is real. At the risk of oversimplifying a discussion that stretches from Heidegger to Latour, the scenic landscape deceives though the illusion of the “verity of things” (p. 153). Strongly shaped by linear perspective, the scenic landscape constructs what is real and reifies abstract space. By educating us that the root of the word diabolic means to confuse, and revisiting Christaller’s work on the spatial planning of Poland for the Nazis, Olwig explains how landscape can simultaneously convey both reactionary and modern meanings. Olwig also calls attention to reactionary modernism in the work of E.O. Wilson and the journalist George Monbiot, drawing parallels between the former’s ideas about sociobiology and the latter’s views about rewilding. A critique of modernism informs many of these essays and gives additional resonance to Olwig’s “cubist collage” metaphor. The Meanings of Landscape succeeds in its elucidation of one of cultural geography’s most contested words. In the process, the book laments the loss of the substantive landscape, particularly the meaning and values of local decision making, and offers a cautionary account of how the scenic landscape can conflate, confuse, and deceive. The Meanings of Landscape deserves a place on our bookshelves for its contributions to the geohumanities, and as well as its valuable work on the evolution of the term landscape and the history of geographic thought.","PeriodicalId":45137,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cultural Geography","volume":"39 1","pages":"152 - 154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cultural Geography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08873631.2021.2006532","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

origins, and meanings, questions about how people experience the landscape are never far removed from the book’s discussions. Some of the most provocative ideas come in the final three chapters, which address the ways in which the scenic landscape becomes bound up with transcendent space and the implications of this. One concern involves how the scenic landscape works to deceive. Unlike radical and Marxist cultural geographers who highlight the ways that scenic landscapes disguise labor and power relations, Olwig focuses on deception via the illusion of what is real. At the risk of oversimplifying a discussion that stretches from Heidegger to Latour, the scenic landscape deceives though the illusion of the “verity of things” (p. 153). Strongly shaped by linear perspective, the scenic landscape constructs what is real and reifies abstract space. By educating us that the root of the word diabolic means to confuse, and revisiting Christaller’s work on the spatial planning of Poland for the Nazis, Olwig explains how landscape can simultaneously convey both reactionary and modern meanings. Olwig also calls attention to reactionary modernism in the work of E.O. Wilson and the journalist George Monbiot, drawing parallels between the former’s ideas about sociobiology and the latter’s views about rewilding. A critique of modernism informs many of these essays and gives additional resonance to Olwig’s “cubist collage” metaphor. The Meanings of Landscape succeeds in its elucidation of one of cultural geography’s most contested words. In the process, the book laments the loss of the substantive landscape, particularly the meaning and values of local decision making, and offers a cautionary account of how the scenic landscape can conflate, confuse, and deceive. The Meanings of Landscape deserves a place on our bookshelves for its contributions to the geohumanities, and as well as its valuable work on the evolution of the term landscape and the history of geographic thought.
可移植社区:蓝草节生活中的位置与位移
关于人们如何体验风景的起源和意义,这些问题从未远离这本书的讨论。一些最具挑衅性的观点出现在最后三章,阐述了风景景观与超越空间的联系方式及其含义。其中一个问题涉及到风景如何欺骗人。与激进的马克思主义文化地理学家强调风景景观掩盖劳动和权力关系的方式不同,奥利维格通过对真实事物的幻觉来关注欺骗。冒着过分简化从海德格尔延伸到拉图尔的讨论的风险,风景通过“事物的真实性”的幻觉来欺骗(第153页)。强烈的线性透视塑造了风景景观,构建了真实的东西,具体化了抽象的空间。通过教育我们“恶魔”这个词的词根意味着混淆,并重温克里斯塔勒为纳粹所做的波兰空间规划工作,奥利维格解释了景观如何同时传达反动和现代的含义。奥利维格还提请人们注意E.O.威尔逊(E.O. Wilson)和记者乔治·蒙比尔特(George Monbiot)作品中的反动现代主义,并将前者关于社会生物学的观点与后者关于野化的观点进行了比较。对现代主义的批判贯穿了这些文章,并给了Olwig的“立体派拼贴”隐喻更多的共鸣。《景观的意义》成功地阐释了文化地理学中最具争议的词汇之一。在这个过程中,这本书哀叹了实质性景观的丧失,特别是地方决策的意义和价值,并对风景景观如何混淆、混淆和欺骗提出了警告。《景观的意义》一书对地理人文学科的贡献,以及它在景观一词的演变和地理思想史方面的宝贵工作,值得在我们的书架上占有一席之地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
22.20%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: Since 1979 this lively journal has provided an international forum for scholarly research devoted to the spatial aspects of human groups, their activities, associated landscapes, and other cultural phenomena. The journal features high quality articles that are written in an accessible style. With a suite of full-length research articles, interpretive essays, special thematic issues devoted to major topics of interest, and book reviews, the Journal of Cultural Geography remains an indispensable resource both within and beyond the academic community. The journal"s audience includes the well-read general public and specialists from geography, ethnic studies, history, historic preservation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信