{"title":"Measuring language dominance in bilinguals with two sign languages","authors":"Dag Johan Lindeberg","doi":"10.1075/lia.22004.lin","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study examines whether a multi-faceted construct of language dominance developed for spoken languages applies\n to signed language bilinguals. Sign languages have been described as highly iconic and relatively similar to each other compared\n to spoken languages. Attaining fluency in the signed modality might well require considerably less effort, and balanced\n bilingualism may be more prevalent in the signed modality. Language dominance constructs, as currently understood, might differ in\n the spoken and signed modality. Forty bilinguals with two sign languages responded to a language dominance questionnaire developed\n for spoken languages and performed a phonological fluency (sign generation) task. Language dominance levels were found to vary in\n the signed modality. The correlation between reported dominance levels and the number of signs generated in each sign language was\n significant, suggesting that the construct of language dominance tested is robust and independent of modality.","PeriodicalId":38778,"journal":{"name":"LIA Language, Interaction and Acquisition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LIA Language, Interaction and Acquisition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.22004.lin","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
This study examines whether a multi-faceted construct of language dominance developed for spoken languages applies
to signed language bilinguals. Sign languages have been described as highly iconic and relatively similar to each other compared
to spoken languages. Attaining fluency in the signed modality might well require considerably less effort, and balanced
bilingualism may be more prevalent in the signed modality. Language dominance constructs, as currently understood, might differ in
the spoken and signed modality. Forty bilinguals with two sign languages responded to a language dominance questionnaire developed
for spoken languages and performed a phonological fluency (sign generation) task. Language dominance levels were found to vary in
the signed modality. The correlation between reported dominance levels and the number of signs generated in each sign language was
significant, suggesting that the construct of language dominance tested is robust and independent of modality.
期刊介绍:
LIA is a bilingual English-French journal that publishes original theoretical and empirical research of high scientific quality at the forefront of current debates concerning language acquisition. It covers all facets of language acquisition among different types of learners and in diverse learning situations, with particular attention to oral speech and/or to signed languages. Topics include the acquisition of one or more foreign languages, of one or more first languages, and of sign languages, as well as learners’ use of gestures during speech; the relationship between language and cognition during acquisition; bilingualism and situations of linguistic contact – for example pidginisation and creolisation. The bilingual nature of LIA aims at reaching readership in a wide international community, while simultaneously continuing to attract intellectual and linguistic resources stemming from multiple scientific traditions in Europe, thereby remaining faithful to its original French anchoring. LIA is the direct descendant of the French-speaking journal AILE.