Metode Directed Reading Thinking Activity (DRTA) dan tingkat berpikir kritis dalam menyunting artikel ilmiah mahasiswa

Asep Supriyana, E. Emzir, E. Boeriswati
{"title":"Metode Directed Reading Thinking Activity (DRTA) dan tingkat berpikir kritis dalam menyunting artikel ilmiah mahasiswa","authors":"Asep Supriyana, E. Emzir, E. Boeriswati","doi":"10.26555/bahastra.v39i2.14699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this research is to explain the use of the DRTA method and the level of critical thinking in improving students' ability in editing scientific articles. The method used in this research is experimental research. The result shows that using the DRTA method affected the ability to edit scientific articles if it is in accordance to the students’ level of critical thinking (high and low). Learning outcomes of editing scientific articles of students who have high critical thinking scales are different from learning outcomes of editing scientific articles of students who have low level of critical thinking. Students who were treated with the DRTA Method had higher level of critical thinking and had significant differences from those who had low levels of critical thinking. The acquisition of the average score showed the students who studied with the DRTA method and had a high critical thinking level are 90.1, while the score of the students who had a low critical thinking level are 79.3.","PeriodicalId":31761,"journal":{"name":"Bahastra","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bahastra","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26555/bahastra.v39i2.14699","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this research is to explain the use of the DRTA method and the level of critical thinking in improving students' ability in editing scientific articles. The method used in this research is experimental research. The result shows that using the DRTA method affected the ability to edit scientific articles if it is in accordance to the students’ level of critical thinking (high and low). Learning outcomes of editing scientific articles of students who have high critical thinking scales are different from learning outcomes of editing scientific articles of students who have low level of critical thinking. Students who were treated with the DRTA Method had higher level of critical thinking and had significant differences from those who had low levels of critical thinking. The acquisition of the average score showed the students who studied with the DRTA method and had a high critical thinking level are 90.1, while the score of the students who had a low critical thinking level are 79.3.
定向阅读思维活动(DRTA)与学生科学文章编辑中的批判性思维水平
本研究的目的是解释DRTA方法的使用和批判性思维水平在提高学生科学文章编辑能力方面的作用。本研究采用的方法是实验研究。结果表明,如果使用DRTA方法符合学生的批判性思维水平(高和低),则会影响科学文章的编辑能力。高批判性思维量表学生编辑科学文章的学习结果与低批判性思维水平学生编辑科学论文的学习结果不同。接受DRTA方法治疗的学生批判性思维水平较高,与批判性思维水平较低的学生有显著差异。平均得分的获取显示,采用DRTA方法学习且批判性思维水平较高的学生为90.1分,而批判性思维水平较低的学生为79.3分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信