Turbulence modeling of 3D high-speed flows with upstream-informed corrections

IF 1.7 4区 工程技术 Q3 MECHANICS
C. Prasad, D. V. Gaitonde
{"title":"Turbulence modeling of 3D high-speed flows with upstream-informed corrections","authors":"C. Prasad,&nbsp;D. V. Gaitonde","doi":"10.1007/s00193-023-01123-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Turbulence modeling has the potential to revolutionize high-speed vehicle design by serving as a co-equal partner to costly and challenging ground and flight testing. However, the fundamental assumptions that make turbulence modeling such an appealing alternative to its scale-resolved counterparts also degrade its accuracy for practical high-speed configurations, especially when fully 3D flows are considered. The current investigation develops a methodology to improve the performance of turbulence modeling for a complex Mach 8.3, 3D shock boundary layer interaction (SBLI) in a double fin geometry.A representative two-equation model, with low-Reynolds-number terms, is used as a test bed. Deficiencies in the baseline model are first elucidated using benchmark test cases involving a Mach 11.1 zero pressure gradient boundary layer and a Mach 6.17 flow over an axisymmetric compression corner. From among different possibilities, two coefficients are introduced to inhibit the non-physical over-amplification of (i) turbulence production and (ii) turbulence length-scale downstream of a shock wave. The coefficients rely on terms already present in the original model, which simplifies implementation and maintains computational costs. The values of the coefficients are predicated on the distribution of turbulence quantities upstream of the shock; this ensures that the modifications do not degrade the model predictions in simpler situations such as attached boundary layers, where they are unnecessary. The effects of the modifications are shown to result in significant improvements in surface pressure and wall heat flux for the 3D SBLI test case, which contains numerous features not observed in 2D situations, such as 3D separation, skewed boundary layers, and centerline vortices. Considerations on the inflow values of turbulence variables and mesh resolution are provided.\n</p></div>","PeriodicalId":775,"journal":{"name":"Shock Waves","volume":"33 2","pages":"99 - 115"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00193-023-01123-8.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shock Waves","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00193-023-01123-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Turbulence modeling has the potential to revolutionize high-speed vehicle design by serving as a co-equal partner to costly and challenging ground and flight testing. However, the fundamental assumptions that make turbulence modeling such an appealing alternative to its scale-resolved counterparts also degrade its accuracy for practical high-speed configurations, especially when fully 3D flows are considered. The current investigation develops a methodology to improve the performance of turbulence modeling for a complex Mach 8.3, 3D shock boundary layer interaction (SBLI) in a double fin geometry.A representative two-equation model, with low-Reynolds-number terms, is used as a test bed. Deficiencies in the baseline model are first elucidated using benchmark test cases involving a Mach 11.1 zero pressure gradient boundary layer and a Mach 6.17 flow over an axisymmetric compression corner. From among different possibilities, two coefficients are introduced to inhibit the non-physical over-amplification of (i) turbulence production and (ii) turbulence length-scale downstream of a shock wave. The coefficients rely on terms already present in the original model, which simplifies implementation and maintains computational costs. The values of the coefficients are predicated on the distribution of turbulence quantities upstream of the shock; this ensures that the modifications do not degrade the model predictions in simpler situations such as attached boundary layers, where they are unnecessary. The effects of the modifications are shown to result in significant improvements in surface pressure and wall heat flux for the 3D SBLI test case, which contains numerous features not observed in 2D situations, such as 3D separation, skewed boundary layers, and centerline vortices. Considerations on the inflow values of turbulence variables and mesh resolution are provided.

Abstract Image

具有上游信息修正的三维高速流动湍流建模
湍流建模作为昂贵且具有挑战性的地面和飞行测试的合作伙伴,有可能彻底改变高速车辆的设计。然而,使湍流建模成为比尺度解析模型更有吸引力的替代方案的基本假设,也降低了其在实际高速配置中的准确性,特别是在考虑全三维流动时。目前的研究开发了一种方法,以提高紊流建模的性能,复杂的马赫8.3,三维激波边界层相互作用(SBLI)在双翅几何。采用具有代表性的低雷诺数项双方程模型作为试验平台。基线模型的缺陷首先通过涉及马赫数11.1的零压力梯度边界层和马赫数6.17的轴对称压缩角流的基准测试案例加以阐明。从不同的可能性中,引入了两个系数来抑制(i)湍流产生和(ii)激波下游湍流长度尺度的非物理过度放大。系数依赖于原始模型中已经存在的项,这简化了实现并保持了计算成本。这些系数的值是根据激波上游湍流量的分布来确定的;这确保了在简单的情况下,如附加边界层,修改不会降低模型预测,在那里它们是不必要的。3D SBLI测试用例的表面压力和壁面热流密度显著改善,其中包含许多在2D情况下未观察到的特征,如3D分离、倾斜边界层和中心线涡。给出了湍流变量入流值和网格分辨率的考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Shock Waves
Shock Waves 物理-力学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
41
审稿时长
17.4 months
期刊介绍: Shock Waves provides a forum for presenting and discussing new results in all fields where shock and detonation phenomena play a role. The journal addresses physicists, engineers and applied mathematicians working on theoretical, experimental or numerical issues, including diagnostics and flow visualization. The research fields considered include, but are not limited to, aero- and gas dynamics, acoustics, physical chemistry, condensed matter and plasmas, with applications encompassing materials sciences, space sciences, geosciences, life sciences and medicine. Of particular interest are contributions which provide insights into fundamental aspects of the techniques that are relevant to more than one specific research community. The journal publishes scholarly research papers, invited review articles and short notes, as well as comments on papers already published in this journal. Occasionally concise meeting reports of interest to the Shock Waves community are published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信