{"title":"Turbulence modeling of 3D high-speed flows with upstream-informed corrections","authors":"C. Prasad, D. V. Gaitonde","doi":"10.1007/s00193-023-01123-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Turbulence modeling has the potential to revolutionize high-speed vehicle design by serving as a co-equal partner to costly and challenging ground and flight testing. However, the fundamental assumptions that make turbulence modeling such an appealing alternative to its scale-resolved counterparts also degrade its accuracy for practical high-speed configurations, especially when fully 3D flows are considered. The current investigation develops a methodology to improve the performance of turbulence modeling for a complex Mach 8.3, 3D shock boundary layer interaction (SBLI) in a double fin geometry.A representative two-equation model, with low-Reynolds-number terms, is used as a test bed. Deficiencies in the baseline model are first elucidated using benchmark test cases involving a Mach 11.1 zero pressure gradient boundary layer and a Mach 6.17 flow over an axisymmetric compression corner. From among different possibilities, two coefficients are introduced to inhibit the non-physical over-amplification of (i) turbulence production and (ii) turbulence length-scale downstream of a shock wave. The coefficients rely on terms already present in the original model, which simplifies implementation and maintains computational costs. The values of the coefficients are predicated on the distribution of turbulence quantities upstream of the shock; this ensures that the modifications do not degrade the model predictions in simpler situations such as attached boundary layers, where they are unnecessary. The effects of the modifications are shown to result in significant improvements in surface pressure and wall heat flux for the 3D SBLI test case, which contains numerous features not observed in 2D situations, such as 3D separation, skewed boundary layers, and centerline vortices. Considerations on the inflow values of turbulence variables and mesh resolution are provided.\n</p></div>","PeriodicalId":775,"journal":{"name":"Shock Waves","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00193-023-01123-8.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shock Waves","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00193-023-01123-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Turbulence modeling has the potential to revolutionize high-speed vehicle design by serving as a co-equal partner to costly and challenging ground and flight testing. However, the fundamental assumptions that make turbulence modeling such an appealing alternative to its scale-resolved counterparts also degrade its accuracy for practical high-speed configurations, especially when fully 3D flows are considered. The current investigation develops a methodology to improve the performance of turbulence modeling for a complex Mach 8.3, 3D shock boundary layer interaction (SBLI) in a double fin geometry.A representative two-equation model, with low-Reynolds-number terms, is used as a test bed. Deficiencies in the baseline model are first elucidated using benchmark test cases involving a Mach 11.1 zero pressure gradient boundary layer and a Mach 6.17 flow over an axisymmetric compression corner. From among different possibilities, two coefficients are introduced to inhibit the non-physical over-amplification of (i) turbulence production and (ii) turbulence length-scale downstream of a shock wave. The coefficients rely on terms already present in the original model, which simplifies implementation and maintains computational costs. The values of the coefficients are predicated on the distribution of turbulence quantities upstream of the shock; this ensures that the modifications do not degrade the model predictions in simpler situations such as attached boundary layers, where they are unnecessary. The effects of the modifications are shown to result in significant improvements in surface pressure and wall heat flux for the 3D SBLI test case, which contains numerous features not observed in 2D situations, such as 3D separation, skewed boundary layers, and centerline vortices. Considerations on the inflow values of turbulence variables and mesh resolution are provided.
期刊介绍:
Shock Waves provides a forum for presenting and discussing new results in all fields where shock and detonation phenomena play a role. The journal addresses physicists, engineers and applied mathematicians working on theoretical, experimental or numerical issues, including diagnostics and flow visualization.
The research fields considered include, but are not limited to, aero- and gas dynamics, acoustics, physical chemistry, condensed matter and plasmas, with applications encompassing materials sciences, space sciences, geosciences, life sciences and medicine.
Of particular interest are contributions which provide insights into fundamental aspects of the techniques that are relevant to more than one specific research community.
The journal publishes scholarly research papers, invited review articles and short notes, as well as comments on papers already published in this journal. Occasionally concise meeting reports of interest to the Shock Waves community are published.