Faculty Awareness and Use of an Institutional Repository at a Master’s Granting University

Q2 Social Sciences
M. Turner, J. Sauer
{"title":"Faculty Awareness and Use of an Institutional Repository at a Master’s Granting University","authors":"M. Turner, J. Sauer","doi":"10.31274/jlsc.13875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION Assessment plays a significant role in managing a successful institutional repository (IR). This study combined the results of a faculty survey that measured faculty awareness of and participation in the IR at a single state master’s granting institution with information regarding content-type and downloads to draw conclusions regarding the composition and usage of the IR at this institution. METHODS A survey was sent to 856 faculty members at Fort Hays State University that asked questions regarding awareness of the IR and participation in the IR demonstrated through deposit and access of materials. Statistics regarding content type and full-text downloads were collected from the repository platform. Collected data was compared with previous studies at other similar institutions to determine similitude or difference between this IR and other IRs at master’s granting and baccalaureate institutions (MBIs). RESULTS & DISCUSSION Faculty awareness and participation in the IR at FHSU is higher than that of other institutions in previous surveys even though overall faculty participation remains low. Content within the IR is largely consistent with other similar institutions. CONCLUSION The faculty survey combined with information regarding repository usage demonstrates that the FHSU Scholars Repository serves a different purpose for both faculty and users than designers envisioned. Efforts to force the IR to resemble that of a research institution may be misplaced. Further research on the content makeup of IRs at MBIs is needed to establish commonalities among smaller institutions.","PeriodicalId":91322,"journal":{"name":"Journal of librarianship and scholarly communication","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of librarianship and scholarly communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31274/jlsc.13875","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Assessment plays a significant role in managing a successful institutional repository (IR). This study combined the results of a faculty survey that measured faculty awareness of and participation in the IR at a single state master’s granting institution with information regarding content-type and downloads to draw conclusions regarding the composition and usage of the IR at this institution. METHODS A survey was sent to 856 faculty members at Fort Hays State University that asked questions regarding awareness of the IR and participation in the IR demonstrated through deposit and access of materials. Statistics regarding content type and full-text downloads were collected from the repository platform. Collected data was compared with previous studies at other similar institutions to determine similitude or difference between this IR and other IRs at master’s granting and baccalaureate institutions (MBIs). RESULTS & DISCUSSION Faculty awareness and participation in the IR at FHSU is higher than that of other institutions in previous surveys even though overall faculty participation remains low. Content within the IR is largely consistent with other similar institutions. CONCLUSION The faculty survey combined with information regarding repository usage demonstrates that the FHSU Scholars Repository serves a different purpose for both faculty and users than designers envisioned. Efforts to force the IR to resemble that of a research institution may be misplaced. Further research on the content makeup of IRs at MBIs is needed to establish commonalities among smaller institutions.
硕士学位授予大学教师对机构知识库的认识和使用
评估在管理一个成功的机构存储库(IR)中起着重要的作用。本研究结合了一项教师调查的结果,该调查测量了单个州硕士学位授予机构的教师对IR的认识和参与情况,并结合了有关内容类型和下载的信息,得出了有关该机构IR的组成和使用情况的结论。研究人员向海斯堡州立大学(Fort Hays State University)的856名教职员工发送了一份调查问卷,询问他们对IR的认识以及通过材料的存放和获取表现出来的IR参与情况。关于内容类型和全文下载的统计数据是从存储库平台收集的。将收集的数据与其他类似机构的先前研究进行比较,以确定该IR与硕士学位授予机构和学士学位机构(mbi)的其他IR之间的相似或差异。结果与讨论在之前的调查中,尽管教师的总体参与度仍然很低,但FHSU的教师对IR的认识和参与程度高于其他机构。国际关系研究所的内容与其他类似机构基本一致。教师调查结合存储库使用的信息表明,FHSU学者存储库为教师和用户提供了不同的目的,而不是设计者所设想的。强迫IR与研究机构相似的努力可能是错误的。需要进一步研究工商管理学院内部报告的内容构成,以确定小型机构之间的共性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信