A Curious Case of Invasive Fungal Sinusitis in a Post-COVID-19 Patient

Ujjwayini Ray, S. Dutta, Nilofar Rana Shams
{"title":"A Curious Case of Invasive Fungal Sinusitis in a Post-COVID-19 Patient","authors":"Ujjwayini Ray, S. Dutta, Nilofar Rana Shams","doi":"10.4103/am.am_84_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Secondary fungal infection following severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 is a serious cause of concern as in majority of cases these are associated with devastating consequences. Invasive mucormycosis which was already prevalent in our country came back with a vengeance during the second wave of COVID-19.\n \n \n \n A 34-year-old male who had recovered from mild COVID disease developed invasive rhinosinusitis by two different fungi. The patient was followed up for clinical course, diagnosis, treatment, and outcome.\n \n \n \n This case illustrates a first of a kind of an invasive fungal rhinosinusitis caused by two different fungi: Schizophyllum commune (of phylum Basidiomycota) and Rhizopus arrhizus (of the Mucorales group) in a patient who had recovered from COVID-19. In this case, conventional methods of direct detection and culture only revealed S. commune. Sequencing after DNA extraction from the paraffin blocks was done due to strong clinical suspicion of invasive mucormycosis and R. arrhizus was detected in the tissue sections. Appropriate antifungals for extended duration ensued complete eradication of the infection\n \n \n \n Host risk factors are to be taken into consideration while diagnosing fungal infection. One needs to look beyond the obvious when clinical diagnosis is not consistent with the etiological agent isolated and in this regard molecular tools are a great help in establishing the etiological agent conclusively.\n","PeriodicalId":34670,"journal":{"name":"Apollo Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Apollo Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/am.am_84_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Secondary fungal infection following severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 is a serious cause of concern as in majority of cases these are associated with devastating consequences. Invasive mucormycosis which was already prevalent in our country came back with a vengeance during the second wave of COVID-19. A 34-year-old male who had recovered from mild COVID disease developed invasive rhinosinusitis by two different fungi. The patient was followed up for clinical course, diagnosis, treatment, and outcome. This case illustrates a first of a kind of an invasive fungal rhinosinusitis caused by two different fungi: Schizophyllum commune (of phylum Basidiomycota) and Rhizopus arrhizus (of the Mucorales group) in a patient who had recovered from COVID-19. In this case, conventional methods of direct detection and culture only revealed S. commune. Sequencing after DNA extraction from the paraffin blocks was done due to strong clinical suspicion of invasive mucormycosis and R. arrhizus was detected in the tissue sections. Appropriate antifungals for extended duration ensued complete eradication of the infection Host risk factors are to be taken into consideration while diagnosing fungal infection. One needs to look beyond the obvious when clinical diagnosis is not consistent with the etiological agent isolated and in this regard molecular tools are a great help in establishing the etiological agent conclusively.
covid -19后患者侵袭性真菌鼻窦炎的一例奇怪病例
严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型继发真菌感染是一个严重的问题,因为在大多数情况下,这些感染与破坏性后果有关。侵袭性毛霉菌病在我国已经流行,在第二波疫情中卷土重来。一名34岁的男性从轻度COVID - 19疾病中康复后,因两种不同的真菌出现了侵袭性鼻窦炎。随访患者的临床病程、诊断、治疗及转归。该病例首次显示了由两种不同真菌引起的侵袭性真菌性鼻窦炎:裂叶菌(担子菌门)和根霉(Mucorales组),患者从COVID-19恢复。在这种情况下,传统的直接检测和培养方法只发现了S. commune。由于临床强烈怀疑为侵袭性毛霉病,从石蜡块中提取DNA后进行测序,在组织切片中检测到arrhizus。在诊断真菌感染时,应考虑宿主的危险因素。当临床诊断与分离的病原不一致时,需要超越明显的因素,在这方面,分子工具对最终确定病原有很大的帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信