Different climate sensitivity of particulate and mineral-associated soil organic matter

IF 15.7 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Emanuele Lugato, Jocelyn M. Lavallee, Michelle L. Haddix, Panos Panagos, M. Francesca Cotrufo
{"title":"Different climate sensitivity of particulate and mineral-associated soil organic matter","authors":"Emanuele Lugato, Jocelyn M. Lavallee, Michelle L. Haddix, Panos Panagos, M. Francesca Cotrufo","doi":"10.1038/s41561-021-00744-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Soil carbon sequestration is seen as an effective means to draw down atmospheric CO2, but at the same time warming may accelerate the loss of extant soil carbon, so an accurate estimation of soil carbon stocks and their vulnerability to climate change is required. Here we demonstrate how separating soil carbon into particulate and mineral-associated organic matter (POM and MAOM, respectively) aids in the understanding of its vulnerability to climate change and identification of carbon sequestration strategies. By coupling European-wide databases with soil organic matter physical fractionation, we assessed the current geographical distribution of mineral topsoil carbon in POM and MAOM by land cover using a machine-learning approach. Further, using observed climate relationships, we projected the vulnerability of carbon in POM and MAOM to future climate change. Arable and coniferous forest soils contain the largest and most vulnerable carbon stocks when cumulated at the European scale. Although we show a lower carbon loss from mineral topsoils with climate change (2.5 ± 1.2 PgC by 2080) than those in some previous predictions, we urge the implementation of coniferous forest management practices that increase plant inputs to soils to offset POM losses, and the adoption of best management practices to avert the loss of and to build up both POM and MAOM in arable soils. Particulate and mineral-associated soil organic carbon have different climate sensitivity and distributions in Europe, according to analyses of measurements of soil carbon fractions from 352 topsoils.","PeriodicalId":19053,"journal":{"name":"Nature Geoscience","volume":"14 5","pages":"295-300"},"PeriodicalIF":15.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1038/s41561-021-00744-x","citationCount":"109","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Geoscience","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41561-021-00744-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 109

Abstract

Soil carbon sequestration is seen as an effective means to draw down atmospheric CO2, but at the same time warming may accelerate the loss of extant soil carbon, so an accurate estimation of soil carbon stocks and their vulnerability to climate change is required. Here we demonstrate how separating soil carbon into particulate and mineral-associated organic matter (POM and MAOM, respectively) aids in the understanding of its vulnerability to climate change and identification of carbon sequestration strategies. By coupling European-wide databases with soil organic matter physical fractionation, we assessed the current geographical distribution of mineral topsoil carbon in POM and MAOM by land cover using a machine-learning approach. Further, using observed climate relationships, we projected the vulnerability of carbon in POM and MAOM to future climate change. Arable and coniferous forest soils contain the largest and most vulnerable carbon stocks when cumulated at the European scale. Although we show a lower carbon loss from mineral topsoils with climate change (2.5 ± 1.2 PgC by 2080) than those in some previous predictions, we urge the implementation of coniferous forest management practices that increase plant inputs to soils to offset POM losses, and the adoption of best management practices to avert the loss of and to build up both POM and MAOM in arable soils. Particulate and mineral-associated soil organic carbon have different climate sensitivity and distributions in Europe, according to analyses of measurements of soil carbon fractions from 352 topsoils.

Abstract Image

颗粒和矿物相关土壤有机质的不同气候敏感性
土壤固碳被视为降低大气中二氧化碳含量的有效手段,但与此同时,气候变暖可能会加速现有土壤碳的流失,因此需要准确估算土壤碳储量及其对气候变化的脆弱性。在这里,我们展示了如何将土壤碳分为颗粒有机质和矿物相关有机质(分别为 POM 和 MAOM),以帮助了解土壤对气候变化的脆弱性并确定碳固存策略。通过将欧洲范围内的数据库与土壤有机物物理分馏技术相结合,我们采用机器学习方法,按土地覆盖情况评估了目前表土矿物碳在 POM 和 MAOM 中的地理分布。此外,利用观测到的气候关系,我们预测了POM和MAOM中的碳对未来气候变化的脆弱性。在欧洲范围内,耕地和针叶林土壤中的碳储量最大,也最脆弱。尽管我们的研究表明,随着气候变化,矿物表层土壤的碳损失(到2080年为2.5 ± 1.2 PgC)低于之前的一些预测,但我们仍敦促实施针叶林管理措施,增加植物对土壤的投入,以抵消POM的损失,并采取最佳管理措施,避免可耕地土壤中POM和MAOM的损失并增加其含量。根据对 352 块表土中土壤碳组分的测量分析,颗粒状土壤有机碳和与矿物相关的土壤有机碳在欧洲具有不同的气候敏感性和分布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nature Geoscience
Nature Geoscience 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
26.70
自引率
1.60%
发文量
187
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: Nature Geoscience is a monthly interdisciplinary journal that gathers top-tier research spanning Earth Sciences and related fields. The journal covers all geoscience disciplines, including fieldwork, modeling, and theoretical studies. Topics include atmospheric science, biogeochemistry, climate science, geobiology, geochemistry, geoinformatics, remote sensing, geology, geomagnetism, paleomagnetism, geomorphology, geophysics, glaciology, hydrology, limnology, mineralogy, oceanography, paleontology, paleoclimatology, paleoceanography, petrology, planetary science, seismology, space physics, tectonics, and volcanology. Nature Geoscience upholds its commitment to publishing significant, high-quality Earth Sciences research through fair, rapid, and rigorous peer review, overseen by a team of full-time professional editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信