Management of Lateral Thigh Pain following Cephalomedullary Nail: A Technical Note

M. Rosen, Connor S Kasik, M. Swords
{"title":"Management of Lateral Thigh Pain following Cephalomedullary Nail: A Technical Note","authors":"M. Rosen, Connor S Kasik, M. Swords","doi":"10.51894/001c.12931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Peritrochanteric hip fractures are most commonly treated with proximal femoral fixation devices, such as a cephalomedullary nail or sliding hip screw. As usage rates increase for these fixation devices, complications from their insertion are becoming more prevalent. Lateral hip pain from proximal locking device insertion and prominence continues to be one of the most frequent complaints regarding hardware irritation following this surgical procedure. Conservative treatment options for this complaint include local corticosteroid injection and physical therapy, although once these treatments have been exhausted, surgical intervention may be recommended. This has generally been managed previously with implant removal, although studies have shown associated femoral neck fractures after removal even with the prescribed protected postoperative weight bearing. Additionally, in certain situations (e.g., when the nail is placed for prophylactic treatment), its removal is contraindicated. The purpose of this manuscript is to describe an alternative treatment option that would limit morbidity, and the need for proximal locking device or implant removal by excising the portion of the iliotibial band causing hip irritation at the level of the proximal locking device, while leaving the retained implant in place. This surgical option would allow most patients to return to their pre-operative weight-bearing status immediately following surgery without the need for additional postoperative precautions.","PeriodicalId":74853,"journal":{"name":"Spartan medical research journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spartan medical research journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51894/001c.12931","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Peritrochanteric hip fractures are most commonly treated with proximal femoral fixation devices, such as a cephalomedullary nail or sliding hip screw. As usage rates increase for these fixation devices, complications from their insertion are becoming more prevalent. Lateral hip pain from proximal locking device insertion and prominence continues to be one of the most frequent complaints regarding hardware irritation following this surgical procedure. Conservative treatment options for this complaint include local corticosteroid injection and physical therapy, although once these treatments have been exhausted, surgical intervention may be recommended. This has generally been managed previously with implant removal, although studies have shown associated femoral neck fractures after removal even with the prescribed protected postoperative weight bearing. Additionally, in certain situations (e.g., when the nail is placed for prophylactic treatment), its removal is contraindicated. The purpose of this manuscript is to describe an alternative treatment option that would limit morbidity, and the need for proximal locking device or implant removal by excising the portion of the iliotibial band causing hip irritation at the level of the proximal locking device, while leaving the retained implant in place. This surgical option would allow most patients to return to their pre-operative weight-bearing status immediately following surgery without the need for additional postoperative precautions.
头髓钉后大腿外侧疼痛的处理:技术说明
股骨转子周围骨折最常用股骨近端固定装置治疗,如头髓内钉或滑动髋螺钉。随着这些固定装置使用率的提高,其插入并发症越来越普遍。近端锁定装置插入和突出引起的髋关节外侧疼痛仍然是该手术后硬件刺激最常见的投诉之一。该投诉的保守治疗方案包括局部皮质类固醇注射和物理治疗,尽管一旦这些治疗方法用尽,可能建议进行手术干预。尽管研究表明,即使在规定的术后负重保护下,移除植入物后也会出现相关的股骨颈骨折,但这种情况以前通常通过移除植入物来处理。此外,在某些情况下(例如,当放置指甲进行预防性治疗时),禁止移除指甲。本手稿的目的是描述一种替代治疗方案,该方案将限制发病率,并通过切除髂胫束的一部分来移除近端锁定装置或植入物,从而在近端锁定设备的水平上引起髋关节刺激,同时保留保留的植入物。这种手术选择将使大多数患者在手术后立即恢复到术前的负重状态,而无需额外的术后预防措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信