Sexual Preference and the Self-Reported Role of Olfaction in Mate Selection

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 Neuroscience
Theresa L. White, Caitlin Cunningham
{"title":"Sexual Preference and the Self-Reported Role of Olfaction in Mate Selection","authors":"Theresa L. White,&nbsp;Caitlin Cunningham","doi":"10.1007/s12078-017-9223-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Olfactory cues are important in mating in many species, including humans. These odorants may be relevant because of their value as a cue to the reproductive fitness of a potential mate (Trivers 1972), but they could also be important as a signal of mate appropriateness in terms of sexual preference (Lübke and Pause 2015). One way to discriminate between these ideas is to examine whether the importance of olfaction in determining a mate is decreased in homosexual individuals, for whom selecting a mate is dissociated from the selection of a reproductive partner. The present research question asked whether the value of olfactory cues for attraction varies between homosexual and heterosexual groups.</p><p>The present study examined odor importance in mating by presenting the Romantic Interest Survey (Herz and Inzlich 2002) to 453 individuals: 142 heterosexual women, 161 heterosexual men, and 150 gay men.</p><p>Regression analysis indicated that heterosexual men valued the sense of smell when selecting a mate more than gay men did. In contrast, gay men valued the sound of a partner’s voice more than did heterosexual men. Heterosexual men and women did not differ by sex in terms of the value of olfaction; both men and women value olfactory aspects of a potential mate highly.</p><p>The higher value of olfactory cues to heterosexual individuals supports the idea that olfaction in mate selection may act as a cue to reproductive fitness, and indicates that olfactory information is not as valuable to gay men in mate selection.</p><p>These findings suggest that many people seem to be looking for similar attributes when searching for a potential romantic partner, and that olfaction is an important aspect of the process.</p>","PeriodicalId":516,"journal":{"name":"Chemosensory Perception","volume":"10 1-2","pages":"31 - 41"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s12078-017-9223-9","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemosensory Perception","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12078-017-9223-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Olfactory cues are important in mating in many species, including humans. These odorants may be relevant because of their value as a cue to the reproductive fitness of a potential mate (Trivers 1972), but they could also be important as a signal of mate appropriateness in terms of sexual preference (Lübke and Pause 2015). One way to discriminate between these ideas is to examine whether the importance of olfaction in determining a mate is decreased in homosexual individuals, for whom selecting a mate is dissociated from the selection of a reproductive partner. The present research question asked whether the value of olfactory cues for attraction varies between homosexual and heterosexual groups.

The present study examined odor importance in mating by presenting the Romantic Interest Survey (Herz and Inzlich 2002) to 453 individuals: 142 heterosexual women, 161 heterosexual men, and 150 gay men.

Regression analysis indicated that heterosexual men valued the sense of smell when selecting a mate more than gay men did. In contrast, gay men valued the sound of a partner’s voice more than did heterosexual men. Heterosexual men and women did not differ by sex in terms of the value of olfaction; both men and women value olfactory aspects of a potential mate highly.

The higher value of olfactory cues to heterosexual individuals supports the idea that olfaction in mate selection may act as a cue to reproductive fitness, and indicates that olfactory information is not as valuable to gay men in mate selection.

These findings suggest that many people seem to be looking for similar attributes when searching for a potential romantic partner, and that olfaction is an important aspect of the process.

Abstract Image

性偏好和嗅觉在择偶中的自我报告作用
嗅觉线索对包括人类在内的许多物种的交配都很重要。这些气味可能是相关的,因为它们作为潜在伴侣生殖健康的线索的价值(Trivers 1972),但它们也可以作为性偏好方面配偶适当性的重要信号(l bke和Pause 2015)。区分这些观点的一种方法是研究嗅觉在决定配偶方面的重要性在同性恋个体中是否降低,因为对他们来说,选择配偶与选择生殖伴侣是分离的。目前的研究问题是,嗅觉提示对吸引力的价值在同性恋和异性恋群体之间是否有所不同。目前的研究通过对453个人进行浪漫兴趣调查(Herz and Inzlich 2002)来检验气味在交配中的重要性:142名异性恋女性,161名异性恋男性和150名同性恋男性。回归分析表明,异性恋男性在择偶时比同性恋男性更看重嗅觉。相比之下,男同性恋者比异性恋者更看重伴侣的声音。异性恋男性和女性在嗅觉价值方面没有性别差异;男性和女性都非常看重潜在伴侣的嗅觉。对异性恋个体来说,嗅觉提示的高价值支持了嗅觉在择偶过程中可能作为生殖适应性提示的观点,并表明嗅觉信息在择偶过程中对男同性恋者没有那么有价值。这些发现表明,许多人在寻找潜在的浪漫伴侣时,似乎都在寻找相似的品质,而嗅觉是这个过程的一个重要方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chemosensory Perception
Chemosensory Perception 农林科学-神经科学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Coverage in Chemosensory Perception includes animal work with implications for human phenomena and explores the following areas: Identification of chemicals producing sensory response; Identification of sensory response associated with chemicals; Human in vivo response to chemical stimuli; Human in vitro response to chemical stimuli; Neuroimaging of chemosensory function; Neurological processing of chemoreception; Chemoreception mechanisms; Psychophysics of chemoperception; Trigeminal function; Multisensory perception; Contextual effect on chemoperception; Behavioral response to chemical stimuli; Physiological factors affecting and contributing to chemoperception; Flavor and hedonics; Memory and chemoperception.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信