Allocation of playing time within team sports – a problem for discussion

Q1 Arts and Humanities
T. Lorentzen
{"title":"Allocation of playing time within team sports – a problem for discussion","authors":"T. Lorentzen","doi":"10.1080/23265507.2016.1266694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The background of the article is the recurrent discussion about allocation of playing time in team sports involving children and young athletes. The objective is to analyse why playing time is a topic for discussion among parents, coaches and athletes. The following question is addressed: Under which condition is it ‘fair’ to use equal and under which condition ‘fair’ to use unequal playing time? Methodologically the article combines literature in the field of psychology, physiology and sociology – and simple mathematics is applied in developing a model for estimating playing time, frequency and timing of substitutions. The article shows that team sports are arenas where social interaction takes place, where norms and rules are internalized and where allocation of a given playing time implies inclusion and exclusion of individuals. The article shows that there exists a single, objective ‘unfair’ allocation of playing time, but a variety of ‘fair’. Lack of objective criteria drives the discussion of fair allocation of playing time. A policy implication of the findings is that an insight into psychosocial mechanisms can change practice to obtain a better and sustainable organization of team sports where young athletes are involved.","PeriodicalId":43562,"journal":{"name":"Open Review of Educational Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23265507.2016.1266694","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Review of Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23265507.2016.1266694","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT The background of the article is the recurrent discussion about allocation of playing time in team sports involving children and young athletes. The objective is to analyse why playing time is a topic for discussion among parents, coaches and athletes. The following question is addressed: Under which condition is it ‘fair’ to use equal and under which condition ‘fair’ to use unequal playing time? Methodologically the article combines literature in the field of psychology, physiology and sociology – and simple mathematics is applied in developing a model for estimating playing time, frequency and timing of substitutions. The article shows that team sports are arenas where social interaction takes place, where norms and rules are internalized and where allocation of a given playing time implies inclusion and exclusion of individuals. The article shows that there exists a single, objective ‘unfair’ allocation of playing time, but a variety of ‘fair’. Lack of objective criteria drives the discussion of fair allocation of playing time. A policy implication of the findings is that an insight into psychosocial mechanisms can change practice to obtain a better and sustainable organization of team sports where young athletes are involved.
团队运动中上场时间的分配——一个需要讨论的问题
摘要:本文的研究背景是关于儿童和青少年运动员在团队运动中上场时间分配的反复讨论。目的是分析为什么上场时间是家长、教练和运动员讨论的话题。下面的问题是:在什么情况下使用平等的游戏时间是“公平的”,在什么情况下使用不平等的游戏时间是“公平的”?在方法上,本文结合了心理学、生理学和社会学领域的文献,并应用简单的数学来开发一个模型,用于估计比赛时间、频率和换人时间。这篇文章表明,团队运动是社会互动发生的场所,是规范和规则内化的场所,在这里,给定比赛时间的分配意味着对个人的包容和排斥。文章表明,游戏时间分配存在单一的、客观的“不公平”分配,但也存在多种“公平”分配。缺乏客观的标准导致了关于公平分配比赛时间的讨论。研究结果的一个政策含义是,对心理社会机制的洞察可以改变实践,以获得更好和可持续的团队运动组织,年轻运动员参与其中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Review of Educational Research
Open Review of Educational Research EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信