Formulation and physical stability analysis of red beetroots (Beta vulgaris l.) effervescent granules

Florenly Florenly, Shieny Lokanata, Jovin Friando, Phuong Thao Mai, H. Le, Cut Cynthia Luzria, Anusak Sintapanont
{"title":"Formulation and physical stability analysis of red beetroots (Beta vulgaris l.) effervescent granules","authors":"Florenly Florenly, Shieny Lokanata, Jovin Friando, Phuong Thao Mai, H. Le, Cut Cynthia Luzria, Anusak Sintapanont","doi":"10.24198/pjd.vol35no2.47031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTIntroduction: Red beetroots (Beta vulgaris L.) are a natural ingredient rich in nutrients and provide various notable health benefits. In dentistry, red beetroots have the potential to act as a plaque-disclosing agent. Previous studies showed that red beetroot preparation in gelform is more effective compared to chewable tablets, but has significant drawbacks in taste. Effervescent granules have the potential to conceal the unpleasant taste of beetroot substances. This study aims to determine the ideal formula and evaluate the physical properties and stability of effervescent granules made from red beetroot extract. Methods: This was an experimental design study with descriptive analysis. The maceration method was used to extract the red beetroot constituents. Fresh fruits were collected, air-dried, and macerated with 96% ethanol twice. The filtrates were then concentrated. The wet granulation method was used to formulate effervescent granules. The samples were grouped into formula 1 (F1), formula 2 (F2), and formula 3 (F3) using 1%, 3%, and 4% red beetroot extract, respectively. All sample groups were analyzed for physical stability, namely: organoleptic, flowability, density, dissolving time, and pH tests. Results: All samples surpassed the sensory evaluation for physical properties. Formula 1 (1%) and formula 2 (3%) models passed all the physical stability tests. Meanwhile, the 4% formula (F3) failed two physical tests. F1 (1%) samples also showed lighter brown color for its lower beetroot extract concentration, indicating under-qualification as dental plaque staining materials. Therefore, 3% concentration (F2) has the best formulation regarding physical properties and stability. Conclusion: Formulas F1 and F2 have the best physical properties and stability by passing all the tests, while Formula 3 failed the organoleptic and flow rate tests.KEYWORDSformulation, physical stability, Beta vulgaris L, effervescent granules","PeriodicalId":31757,"journal":{"name":"Padjadjaran Journal of Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Padjadjaran Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24198/pjd.vol35no2.47031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTIntroduction: Red beetroots (Beta vulgaris L.) are a natural ingredient rich in nutrients and provide various notable health benefits. In dentistry, red beetroots have the potential to act as a plaque-disclosing agent. Previous studies showed that red beetroot preparation in gelform is more effective compared to chewable tablets, but has significant drawbacks in taste. Effervescent granules have the potential to conceal the unpleasant taste of beetroot substances. This study aims to determine the ideal formula and evaluate the physical properties and stability of effervescent granules made from red beetroot extract. Methods: This was an experimental design study with descriptive analysis. The maceration method was used to extract the red beetroot constituents. Fresh fruits were collected, air-dried, and macerated with 96% ethanol twice. The filtrates were then concentrated. The wet granulation method was used to formulate effervescent granules. The samples were grouped into formula 1 (F1), formula 2 (F2), and formula 3 (F3) using 1%, 3%, and 4% red beetroot extract, respectively. All sample groups were analyzed for physical stability, namely: organoleptic, flowability, density, dissolving time, and pH tests. Results: All samples surpassed the sensory evaluation for physical properties. Formula 1 (1%) and formula 2 (3%) models passed all the physical stability tests. Meanwhile, the 4% formula (F3) failed two physical tests. F1 (1%) samples also showed lighter brown color for its lower beetroot extract concentration, indicating under-qualification as dental plaque staining materials. Therefore, 3% concentration (F2) has the best formulation regarding physical properties and stability. Conclusion: Formulas F1 and F2 have the best physical properties and stability by passing all the tests, while Formula 3 failed the organoleptic and flow rate tests.KEYWORDSformulation, physical stability, Beta vulgaris L, effervescent granules
红甜菜根泡腾剂的配方及物理稳定性分析
摘要简介:红甜菜根(Beta vulgaris L.)是一种富含营养成分的天然成分,具有多种显著的保健功效。在牙科中,红甜菜根有潜在的牙菌斑暴露剂的作用。先前的研究表明,红甜菜根凝胶状制剂比咀嚼片更有效,但在味道上有明显的缺点。泡腾状颗粒有可能掩盖甜菜根物质的难闻味道。本研究旨在确定红甜菜根提取物泡腾剂的理想配方,并对其物理性能和稳定性进行评价。方法:采用描述性分析的实验设计研究。采用浸渍法提取红甜菜根成分。收集新鲜水果,风干,用96%乙醇浸泡两次。然后浓缩滤液。采用湿造粒法制备泡腾型颗粒。采用1%、3%、4%的红甜菜根提取物将样品分为公式1 (F1)、公式2 (F2)、公式3 (F3)。对所有样品组进行物理稳定性分析,即:感官、流动性、密度、溶解时间和pH值测试。结果:所有样品的物理性能均优于感官评价。公式1(1%)和公式2(3%)模型通过了所有物理稳定性测试。同时,4%公式(F3)两次物理测试均失败。F1(1%)样品也显示出较浅的棕色,因为其甜菜根提取物浓度较低,表明作为牙菌斑染色材料不合格。因此,在物理性能和稳定性方面,3%的浓度(F2)为最佳配方。结论:配方F1和F2的物理性能和稳定性均通过各项试验,而配方3的感官和流速试验均未通过。【关键词】配方;物理稳定性;甜菜甙
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
3 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信