Methodological innovations at the intersection of video-based educational research traditions: Reflections on relevance, data selection, and phenomena of interest

IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
David DeLiema, Ashley S. Hufnagle, V. Rao, Justin Baker, J. Valerie, Jasmine Kim
{"title":"Methodological innovations at the intersection of video-based educational research traditions: Reflections on relevance, data selection, and phenomena of interest","authors":"David DeLiema, Ashley S. Hufnagle, V. Rao, Justin Baker, J. Valerie, Jasmine Kim","doi":"10.1080/1743727X.2021.2011196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Approaches to discourse analysis in educational research tend to operate within the boundaries of particular video-based research traditions. We examine four of these traditions that are especially relevant to the learning sciences – conversation analysis, discursive psychology, interaction analysis, and video-cued ethnography – and instead of assuming that they are incommensurate, we examine their interconnections and areas of synthesis to make space for methodological innovations. In looking for unforeseen or de-emphasized points of synergy, we consider four approaches to each tradition: (1) making claims about internal processes; (2) inviting research participants to reflect on the video records; (3) formulating conjectures about the video data; and (4) noticing and documenting patterns. We examine the above approaches in the context of a research-practice partnership between educational researchers and a non-profit organization focused on outdoor family play, focusing in particular on autonomy-supportive parenting. Through this methodological reflection, we raise a number of novel considerations regarding how video-based educational researchers can understand what is relevant to the participants, engage with data selection, and formulate claims about recognizable phenomena in the data. We conclude by discussing problems of practice in video-based educational research that this mixed-tradition approach can address.","PeriodicalId":51655,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Research & Method in Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Research & Method in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2021.2011196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT Approaches to discourse analysis in educational research tend to operate within the boundaries of particular video-based research traditions. We examine four of these traditions that are especially relevant to the learning sciences – conversation analysis, discursive psychology, interaction analysis, and video-cued ethnography – and instead of assuming that they are incommensurate, we examine their interconnections and areas of synthesis to make space for methodological innovations. In looking for unforeseen or de-emphasized points of synergy, we consider four approaches to each tradition: (1) making claims about internal processes; (2) inviting research participants to reflect on the video records; (3) formulating conjectures about the video data; and (4) noticing and documenting patterns. We examine the above approaches in the context of a research-practice partnership between educational researchers and a non-profit organization focused on outdoor family play, focusing in particular on autonomy-supportive parenting. Through this methodological reflection, we raise a number of novel considerations regarding how video-based educational researchers can understand what is relevant to the participants, engage with data selection, and formulate claims about recognizable phenomena in the data. We conclude by discussing problems of practice in video-based educational research that this mixed-tradition approach can address.
基于视频的教育研究传统交叉点的方法论创新:对相关性、数据选择和感兴趣现象的反思
教育研究中的话语分析方法往往在特定的基于视频的研究传统的边界内运作。我们研究了其中四种与学习科学特别相关的传统——对话分析、话语心理学、互动分析和视频线索人种学——而不是假设它们是不相称的,我们研究了它们的相互联系和综合领域,为方法论创新腾出空间。在寻找不可预见的或不强调的协同点时,我们考虑了每种传统的四种方法:(1)对内部流程提出要求;(2)邀请研究参与者对视频记录进行反思;(3)对视频数据进行推测;(4)注意和记录模式。我们在教育研究人员和一个专注于户外家庭游戏的非营利组织之间的研究实践伙伴关系的背景下研究上述方法,特别关注自主支持的育儿。通过这种方法的反思,我们提出了一些关于基于视频的教育研究人员如何理解与参与者相关的内容,参与数据选择,并制定关于数据中可识别现象的声明的新考虑。最后,我们讨论了这种混合传统方法可以解决的基于视频的教育研究实践中的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Research & Method in Education is an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal that draws contributions from a wide community of international researchers. Contributions are expected to develop and further international discourse in educational research with a particular focus on method and methodological issues. The journal welcomes papers engaging with methods from within a qualitative or quantitative framework, or from frameworks which cut across and or challenge this duality. Papers should not solely focus on the practice of education; there must be a contribution to methodology. International Journal of Research & Method in Education is committed to publishing scholarly research that discusses conceptual, theoretical and methodological issues, provides evidence, support for or informed critique of unusual or new methodologies within educational research and provides innovative, new perspectives and examinations of key research findings. The journal’s enthusiasm to foster debate is also recognised in a keenness to include engaged, thought-provoking response papers to previously published articles. The journal is also interested in papers that discuss issues in the teaching of research methods for educational researchers. Contributors to International Journal of Research & Method in Education should take care to communicate their findings or arguments in a succinct, accessible manner to an international readership of researchers, policy-makers and practitioners from a range of disciplines including but not limited to philosophy, sociology, economics, psychology, and history of education. The Co-Editors welcome suggested topics for future Special Issues. Initial ideas should be discussed by email with the Co-Editors before a formal proposal is submitted for consideration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信