{"title":"Exhuming Franco: Spain’s second transition","authors":"Mari Paz Balibrea","doi":"10.1080/00182370.2021.2077612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"struggles that ultimately led to the independence of Spain’s American colonies. However, no historian is uniformly equipped to write a history that covers multiple continents and disparate regions across the globe. It is understandable then that not all chapters derive from archival research. The opening chapters rely heavily on secondary sources, and there is little new or fresh insight provided in these sections. Furthermore, a harsh critic might highlight several campaigns and events that have received little to no attention within the narrative. The British expeditions to the West Indies in the 1790s, and the brutal violence that took place during the Haitian Revolution, could have received greater consideration. Without the benefits of modern medicine, microbes are frequently more lethal than musket or cannon, and this reviewer feels that Mikaberidze could have better accounted for the appalling human cost of disease in campaigns across the globe. While this book should be praised for illustrating the global ramifications of the war in impressive detail, the narrative rarely pauses to reflect on how viewing the war in a global context might change our understanding of the conflict. Despite the global approach to the subject, Mikaberidze tends to ask overly familiar questions that have been posed by earlier scholars: Was Napoleon integral to the failure of the Peace of Amiens? Was he justified in rejecting peace proposals in 1813? Was the legacy of Napoleonic reform a positive one? Greater attention could have been paid to how war acted as a medium for intellectual, cultural, and technological exchange between different military bodies stationed around the world. Despite these faults, the expansive breadth and depth of Mikaberidze’s account will satisfy popular and scholarly audiences. It is a strong singlevolume account of the Napoleonic Wars.","PeriodicalId":44078,"journal":{"name":"HISTORIAN","volume":"83 1","pages":"503 - 505"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HISTORIAN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00182370.2021.2077612","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
struggles that ultimately led to the independence of Spain’s American colonies. However, no historian is uniformly equipped to write a history that covers multiple continents and disparate regions across the globe. It is understandable then that not all chapters derive from archival research. The opening chapters rely heavily on secondary sources, and there is little new or fresh insight provided in these sections. Furthermore, a harsh critic might highlight several campaigns and events that have received little to no attention within the narrative. The British expeditions to the West Indies in the 1790s, and the brutal violence that took place during the Haitian Revolution, could have received greater consideration. Without the benefits of modern medicine, microbes are frequently more lethal than musket or cannon, and this reviewer feels that Mikaberidze could have better accounted for the appalling human cost of disease in campaigns across the globe. While this book should be praised for illustrating the global ramifications of the war in impressive detail, the narrative rarely pauses to reflect on how viewing the war in a global context might change our understanding of the conflict. Despite the global approach to the subject, Mikaberidze tends to ask overly familiar questions that have been posed by earlier scholars: Was Napoleon integral to the failure of the Peace of Amiens? Was he justified in rejecting peace proposals in 1813? Was the legacy of Napoleonic reform a positive one? Greater attention could have been paid to how war acted as a medium for intellectual, cultural, and technological exchange between different military bodies stationed around the world. Despite these faults, the expansive breadth and depth of Mikaberidze’s account will satisfy popular and scholarly audiences. It is a strong singlevolume account of the Napoleonic Wars.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1938, The Historian has one of the largest circulations of any scholarly journal in the US or Britain with over 13,000 paid subscribers, both individual and institutional. The Historian seeks to publish only the finest of contemporary and relevant historical scholarship. It is the commitment of The Historian to serve as an integrator for the historical profession, bringing together the many strands of historical analysis through the publication of a diverse collection of articles.