Exhuming Franco: Spain’s second transition

IF 0.1 4区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY
Mari Paz Balibrea
{"title":"Exhuming Franco: Spain’s second transition","authors":"Mari Paz Balibrea","doi":"10.1080/00182370.2021.2077612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"struggles that ultimately led to the independence of Spain’s American colonies. However, no historian is uniformly equipped to write a history that covers multiple continents and disparate regions across the globe. It is understandable then that not all chapters derive from archival research. The opening chapters rely heavily on secondary sources, and there is little new or fresh insight provided in these sections. Furthermore, a harsh critic might highlight several campaigns and events that have received little to no attention within the narrative. The British expeditions to the West Indies in the 1790s, and the brutal violence that took place during the Haitian Revolution, could have received greater consideration. Without the benefits of modern medicine, microbes are frequently more lethal than musket or cannon, and this reviewer feels that Mikaberidze could have better accounted for the appalling human cost of disease in campaigns across the globe. While this book should be praised for illustrating the global ramifications of the war in impressive detail, the narrative rarely pauses to reflect on how viewing the war in a global context might change our understanding of the conflict. Despite the global approach to the subject, Mikaberidze tends to ask overly familiar questions that have been posed by earlier scholars: Was Napoleon integral to the failure of the Peace of Amiens? Was he justified in rejecting peace proposals in 1813? Was the legacy of Napoleonic reform a positive one? Greater attention could have been paid to how war acted as a medium for intellectual, cultural, and technological exchange between different military bodies stationed around the world. Despite these faults, the expansive breadth and depth of Mikaberidze’s account will satisfy popular and scholarly audiences. It is a strong singlevolume account of the Napoleonic Wars.","PeriodicalId":44078,"journal":{"name":"HISTORIAN","volume":"83 1","pages":"503 - 505"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HISTORIAN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00182370.2021.2077612","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

struggles that ultimately led to the independence of Spain’s American colonies. However, no historian is uniformly equipped to write a history that covers multiple continents and disparate regions across the globe. It is understandable then that not all chapters derive from archival research. The opening chapters rely heavily on secondary sources, and there is little new or fresh insight provided in these sections. Furthermore, a harsh critic might highlight several campaigns and events that have received little to no attention within the narrative. The British expeditions to the West Indies in the 1790s, and the brutal violence that took place during the Haitian Revolution, could have received greater consideration. Without the benefits of modern medicine, microbes are frequently more lethal than musket or cannon, and this reviewer feels that Mikaberidze could have better accounted for the appalling human cost of disease in campaigns across the globe. While this book should be praised for illustrating the global ramifications of the war in impressive detail, the narrative rarely pauses to reflect on how viewing the war in a global context might change our understanding of the conflict. Despite the global approach to the subject, Mikaberidze tends to ask overly familiar questions that have been posed by earlier scholars: Was Napoleon integral to the failure of the Peace of Amiens? Was he justified in rejecting peace proposals in 1813? Was the legacy of Napoleonic reform a positive one? Greater attention could have been paid to how war acted as a medium for intellectual, cultural, and technological exchange between different military bodies stationed around the world. Despite these faults, the expansive breadth and depth of Mikaberidze’s account will satisfy popular and scholarly audiences. It is a strong singlevolume account of the Napoleonic Wars.
挖掘佛朗哥:西班牙的第二次转型
最终导致西班牙美洲殖民地独立的斗争。然而,没有一位历史学家能够统一地撰写一部涵盖全球多大洲和不同地区的历史。可以理解的是,并非所有章节都来自档案研究。开头的章节在很大程度上依赖于次要来源,在这些章节中几乎没有提供新的或新鲜的见解。此外,严厉的评论家可能会强调一些在叙事中几乎没有受到关注的竞选活动和事件。1790年代英国对西印度群岛的探险,以及海地革命期间发生的残酷暴力,本可以得到更多的考虑。如果没有现代医学的好处,微生物往往比步枪或大炮更致命,这位评论家认为,在全球各地的运动中,Mikaberidze本可以更好地解释疾病造成的可怕的人类代价。虽然这本书以令人印象深刻的细节阐述了战争的全球影响,应该受到赞扬,但叙事很少停顿,反思在全球背景下看待战争可能会如何改变我们对冲突的理解。尽管对这个问题采取了全球性的方法,但米卡贝里泽倾向于提出早期学者提出的过于熟悉的问题:拿破仑是亚眠和平失败的一部分吗?他在1813年拒绝和平提议是否合理?拿破仑改革的遗产是积极的吗?本可以更多地关注战争如何成为驻扎在世界各地的不同军事机构之间进行知识、文化和技术交流的媒介。尽管存在这些缺陷,但米卡贝里泽叙述的广度和深度之广将满足大众和学术观众的需求。这是一本关于拿破仑战争的单行本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
HISTORIAN
HISTORIAN HISTORY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
期刊介绍: Founded in 1938, The Historian has one of the largest circulations of any scholarly journal in the US or Britain with over 13,000 paid subscribers, both individual and institutional. The Historian seeks to publish only the finest of contemporary and relevant historical scholarship. It is the commitment of The Historian to serve as an integrator for the historical profession, bringing together the many strands of historical analysis through the publication of a diverse collection of articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信