Bystander Helping Behavior in Response to Workplace Bullying

IF 0.8 Q3 Psychology
C. Hellemans, Davide Dal Cason, A. Casini
{"title":"Bystander Helping Behavior in Response to Workplace Bullying","authors":"C. Hellemans, Davide Dal Cason, A. Casini","doi":"10.1024/1421-0185/a000200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research examines the role of colleagues’ helping behavior in workplace bullying. Although colleagues are often able to intervene to support the victim or stop the bullying, passive behavior and nonintervention are more frequent. The bystander effect described by Latané and Darley (1970) has been studied in the context of school bullying and sexual harassment, but only rarely has it been studied in the context of workplace bullying. We tested the influence of the belief in a just world for others, self-efficacy, perceived severity, and causal attribution as determinants of three types of bystander helping behavior. We used a vignette describing a case of bullying in a vertically organized workplace in an online questionnaire survey, which was completed by 194 workers. The results showed that low self-efficacy was associated with nonintervention, that perceived severity mainly determined public helping behavior, and that both internal and external causal attributions contributed to explaining both emotional and public support for the harassed colleague. The results highlight the importance of training to increase awareness and recognition of bullying phenomena among colleagues.","PeriodicalId":46193,"journal":{"name":"Swiss Journal of Psychology","volume":"76 1","pages":"135–144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swiss Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

This research examines the role of colleagues’ helping behavior in workplace bullying. Although colleagues are often able to intervene to support the victim or stop the bullying, passive behavior and nonintervention are more frequent. The bystander effect described by Latané and Darley (1970) has been studied in the context of school bullying and sexual harassment, but only rarely has it been studied in the context of workplace bullying. We tested the influence of the belief in a just world for others, self-efficacy, perceived severity, and causal attribution as determinants of three types of bystander helping behavior. We used a vignette describing a case of bullying in a vertically organized workplace in an online questionnaire survey, which was completed by 194 workers. The results showed that low self-efficacy was associated with nonintervention, that perceived severity mainly determined public helping behavior, and that both internal and external causal attributions contributed to explaining both emotional and public support for the harassed colleague. The results highlight the importance of training to increase awareness and recognition of bullying phenomena among colleagues.
职场霸凌的旁观者帮助行为
这项研究考察了同事的帮助行为在职场欺凌中的作用。尽管同事们通常能够进行干预以支持受害者或阻止欺凌,但被动行为和不干预更为常见。Latané和Darley(1970)描述的旁观者效应已经在学校欺凌和性骚扰的背景下进行了研究,但很少在工作场所欺凌的背景下研究。我们测试了对他人公正世界的信念、自我效能感、感知严重性和因果归因对三种类型的旁观者帮助行为的影响。在一项由194名员工完成的在线问卷调查中,我们使用了一个小插曲来描述一个垂直组织的工作场所中的欺凌案例。结果表明,低自我效能感与不干预有关,感知的严重程度主要决定了公共帮助行为,内部和外部因果归因都有助于解释对被骚扰同事的情感和公众支持。研究结果强调了培训对提高同事对欺凌现象的认识和认可的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Swiss Journal of Psychology
Swiss Journal of Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: General, Clinical, Social, Organizational, Developmental, Personality, and Biological Psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信