Protocol and statistical analysis plan for the mega randomised registry trial comparing conservative vs. liberal oxygenation targets in adults with nonhypoxic ischaemic acute brain injuries and conditions in the intensive care unit (Mega-ROX Brains)
Paul J. Young MBChB, PhD , Abdulrahman Al-Fares MBChB, FRCPC, ABIM, MRCP , Diptesh Aryal MD , Yaseen M. Arabi MD , Muhammad Sheharyar Ashraf MD , Sean M. Bagshaw MD, MSc, PhD , Mohd Basri Mat-Nor , Abigail Beane PhD , Giovanni Borghi MD , Airton L. de Oliveira Manoel MD, PhD , Layoni Dullawe BSc , Fathima Fazla BSc , Tomoko Fujii MD, PhD , Rashan Haniffa PhD , Carol L. Hodgson PT, MPhil, PhD , Anna Hunt BN , Cassie Lawrence BN , Diane Mackle MN. PhD , Kishore Mangal MD , Alistair D. Nichol PhD , Jessica Kasza PhD
{"title":"Protocol and statistical analysis plan for the mega randomised registry trial comparing conservative vs. liberal oxygenation targets in adults with nonhypoxic ischaemic acute brain injuries and conditions in the intensive care unit (Mega-ROX Brains)","authors":"Paul J. Young MBChB, PhD , Abdulrahman Al-Fares MBChB, FRCPC, ABIM, MRCP , Diptesh Aryal MD , Yaseen M. Arabi MD , Muhammad Sheharyar Ashraf MD , Sean M. Bagshaw MD, MSc, PhD , Mohd Basri Mat-Nor , Abigail Beane PhD , Giovanni Borghi MD , Airton L. de Oliveira Manoel MD, PhD , Layoni Dullawe BSc , Fathima Fazla BSc , Tomoko Fujii MD, PhD , Rashan Haniffa PhD , Carol L. Hodgson PT, MPhil, PhD , Anna Hunt BN , Cassie Lawrence BN , Diane Mackle MN. PhD , Kishore Mangal MD , Alistair D. Nichol PhD , Jessica Kasza PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.ccrj.2023.04.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The effect of conservative vs. liberal oxygen therapy on 90-day in-hospital mortality in adults who have nonhypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy acute brain injuries and conditions and are receiving invasive mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit (ICU) is uncertain.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The objective of this study was to summarise the protocol and statistical analysis plan for the Mega-ROX Brains trial.</p></div><div><h3>Design, setting, and participants</h3><p>Mega-ROX Brains is an international randomised clinical trial, which will be conducted within an overarching 40,000-participant, registry-embedded clinical trial comparing conservative and liberal ICU oxygen therapy regimens. We expect to enrol between 7500 and 9500 participants with nonhypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy acute brain injuries and conditions who are receiving unplanned invasive mechanical ventilation in the ICU.</p></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><p>The primary outcome is in-hospital all-cause mortality up to 90 d from the date of randomisation. Secondary outcomes include duration of survival, duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay, and the proportion of participants discharged home.</p></div><div><h3>Results and conclusions</h3><p>Mega-ROX Brains will compare the effect of conservative vs. liberal oxygen therapy regimens on 90-day in-hospital mortality in adults in the ICU with acute brain injuries and conditions. The protocol and planned analyses are reported here to mitigate analysis bias.</p></div><div><h3>Trial Registration</h3><p>Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN 12620000391976).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49215,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care and Resuscitation","volume":"25 1","pages":"Pages 53-59"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care and Resuscitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1441277223000133","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Background
The effect of conservative vs. liberal oxygen therapy on 90-day in-hospital mortality in adults who have nonhypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy acute brain injuries and conditions and are receiving invasive mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit (ICU) is uncertain.
Objective
The objective of this study was to summarise the protocol and statistical analysis plan for the Mega-ROX Brains trial.
Design, setting, and participants
Mega-ROX Brains is an international randomised clinical trial, which will be conducted within an overarching 40,000-participant, registry-embedded clinical trial comparing conservative and liberal ICU oxygen therapy regimens. We expect to enrol between 7500 and 9500 participants with nonhypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy acute brain injuries and conditions who are receiving unplanned invasive mechanical ventilation in the ICU.
Main outcome measures
The primary outcome is in-hospital all-cause mortality up to 90 d from the date of randomisation. Secondary outcomes include duration of survival, duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay, and the proportion of participants discharged home.
Results and conclusions
Mega-ROX Brains will compare the effect of conservative vs. liberal oxygen therapy regimens on 90-day in-hospital mortality in adults in the ICU with acute brain injuries and conditions. The protocol and planned analyses are reported here to mitigate analysis bias.
Trial Registration
Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN 12620000391976).
期刊介绍:
ritical Care and Resuscitation (CC&R) is the official scientific journal of the College of Intensive Care Medicine (CICM). The Journal is a quarterly publication (ISSN 1441-2772) with original articles of scientific and clinical interest in the specialities of Critical Care, Intensive Care, Anaesthesia, Emergency Medicine and related disciplines.
The Journal is received by all Fellows and trainees, along with an increasing number of subscribers from around the world.
The CC&R Journal currently has an impact factor of 3.3, placing it in 8th position in world critical care journals and in first position in the world outside the USA and Europe.