A randomized trial of price subsidies for liquefied petroleum cooking gas among low-income households in rural India

IF 2.2 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Marc Jeuland , Manish A. Desai , Elizabeth F. Bair , Nafeesa Mohideen Abdul Cader , Durairaj Natesan , Wilson Jayakaran Isaac , Sankar Sambandam , Kalpana Balakrishnan , Gurusamy Thangavel , Harsha Thirumurthy
{"title":"A randomized trial of price subsidies for liquefied petroleum cooking gas among low-income households in rural India","authors":"Marc Jeuland ,&nbsp;Manish A. Desai ,&nbsp;Elizabeth F. Bair ,&nbsp;Nafeesa Mohideen Abdul Cader ,&nbsp;Durairaj Natesan ,&nbsp;Wilson Jayakaran Isaac ,&nbsp;Sankar Sambandam ,&nbsp;Kalpana Balakrishnan ,&nbsp;Gurusamy Thangavel ,&nbsp;Harsha Thirumurthy","doi":"10.1016/j.wdp.2023.100490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The use of solid fuels for cooking is a major contributor to mortality, disease burden, and environmental harm in many countries. To tackle the problem, India expanded access to a cleaner and often subsidized alternative, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), but solid fuels reliance has persisted. Aiming to inform LPG subsidy policy, we conducted a field experiment with low-income households in rural India to examine how LPG prices affect demand. Households (n = 580) were randomized to four groups: a control group that received no discount beyond the existing subsidy and three treatment groups that received discount vouchers worth US$1.7, US$3.4, and US$5.1 per cylinder refill. Purchases of LPG cylinders increased significantly with the size of the discounts. The findings indicate that higher LPG subsidy amounts will be necessary to achieve near exclusive use of this cleaner cooking fuel among low-income Indian households, in support of health and environmental goals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37831,"journal":{"name":"World Development Perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Development Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452292923000061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of solid fuels for cooking is a major contributor to mortality, disease burden, and environmental harm in many countries. To tackle the problem, India expanded access to a cleaner and often subsidized alternative, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), but solid fuels reliance has persisted. Aiming to inform LPG subsidy policy, we conducted a field experiment with low-income households in rural India to examine how LPG prices affect demand. Households (n = 580) were randomized to four groups: a control group that received no discount beyond the existing subsidy and three treatment groups that received discount vouchers worth US$1.7, US$3.4, and US$5.1 per cylinder refill. Purchases of LPG cylinders increased significantly with the size of the discounts. The findings indicate that higher LPG subsidy amounts will be necessary to achieve near exclusive use of this cleaner cooking fuel among low-income Indian households, in support of health and environmental goals.

印度农村低收入家庭液化石油气价格补贴的随机试验
在许多国家,使用固体燃料烹饪是造成死亡率、疾病负担和环境危害的一个主要因素。为了解决这个问题,印度扩大了对更清洁、经常得到补贴的替代能源液化石油气(LPG)的使用,但对固体燃料的依赖仍然存在。为了为LPG补贴政策提供信息,我们在印度农村的低收入家庭进行了实地实验,以研究LPG价格如何影响需求。家庭(n = 580)被随机分为四组:对照组在现有补贴的基础上不享受任何折扣,而三个治疗组每补充一次气瓶获得价值1.7美元、3.4美元和5.1美元的折扣券。随着折扣幅度的增加,石油气气瓶的购买量大幅增加。调查结果表明,为了实现印度低收入家庭几乎完全使用这种更清洁的烹饪燃料,以支持健康和环境目标,有必要提高液化石油气补贴数额。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Development Perspectives
World Development Perspectives Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: World Development Perspectives is a multi-disciplinary journal of international development. It seeks to explore ways of improving human well-being by examining the performance and impact of interventions designed to address issues related to: poverty alleviation, public health and malnutrition, agricultural production, natural resource governance, globalization and transnational processes, technological progress, gender and social discrimination, and participation in economic and political life. Above all, we are particularly interested in the role of historical, legal, social, economic, political, biophysical, and/or ecological contexts in shaping development processes and outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信