Disabled Sex Workers’ Fight for Digital Rights, Platform Accessibility, and Design Justice

Emily Coombes, Ariel Wolf, Danielle Blunt, Kassandra Sparks
{"title":"Disabled Sex Workers’ Fight for Digital Rights, Platform Accessibility, and Design Justice","authors":"Emily Coombes, Ariel Wolf, Danielle Blunt, Kassandra Sparks","doi":"10.18061/dsq.v42i2.9097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Internet technologies are an increasingly necessary tool for sex working people, disabled people, and people who hold both identities to access resources, community, and income, as well as make claims to rights and fight for social justice. However, ongoing community research suggests that the failures of online platforms to address accessibility needs have had grave effects on sex workers, particularly those with disabilities. This article examines how normative whorephobic, racist, ableist user experience (UX) social media design intersects with punitive virtual content moderation systems to negatively impact disabled sex workers. To better understand how, we focus on unique problems faced by disabled people on the internet and how disability intersects with the sex trade and sexualization more broadly. We draw on data from our previous community research, Erased: The Impact of FOSTA-SESTA and the Removal of Backpage, in addition to Posting into the Void, to share experiences of sex workers navigating disability and discriminatory online systems. We highlight how whorephobic content moderation and punitive platform policing, exacerbated by FOSTA-SESTA, uniquely impact disabled sex workers, particularly those who depend on visual or aural aids to engage with social media. In doing so, we highlight critical intersections between disability justice, sex worker justice, and design justice to advocate for the importance of collaboration between movements.","PeriodicalId":55735,"journal":{"name":"Disability Studies Quarterly","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability Studies Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v42i2.9097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Internet technologies are an increasingly necessary tool for sex working people, disabled people, and people who hold both identities to access resources, community, and income, as well as make claims to rights and fight for social justice. However, ongoing community research suggests that the failures of online platforms to address accessibility needs have had grave effects on sex workers, particularly those with disabilities. This article examines how normative whorephobic, racist, ableist user experience (UX) social media design intersects with punitive virtual content moderation systems to negatively impact disabled sex workers. To better understand how, we focus on unique problems faced by disabled people on the internet and how disability intersects with the sex trade and sexualization more broadly. We draw on data from our previous community research, Erased: The Impact of FOSTA-SESTA and the Removal of Backpage, in addition to Posting into the Void, to share experiences of sex workers navigating disability and discriminatory online systems. We highlight how whorephobic content moderation and punitive platform policing, exacerbated by FOSTA-SESTA, uniquely impact disabled sex workers, particularly those who depend on visual or aural aids to engage with social media. In doing so, we highlight critical intersections between disability justice, sex worker justice, and design justice to advocate for the importance of collaboration between movements.
残障性工作者为数字权利、平台无障碍和设计公正而战
对于性工作者、残疾人和同时拥有资源、社区和收入的人来说,互联网技术是一种越来越必要的工具,他们可以要求权利并为社会正义而战。然而,正在进行的社区研究表明,在线平台未能满足无障碍需求,对性工作者,特别是残疾人产生了严重影响。这篇文章探讨了规范的恐嫖、种族主义、有能力的用户体验(UX)社交媒体设计如何与惩罚性的虚拟内容审核系统交叉,从而对残疾性工作者产生负面影响。为了更好地理解如何,我们关注残疾人在互联网上面临的独特问题,以及残疾如何与性交易和性化更广泛地交叉。我们借鉴了我们之前的社区研究《被抹去:FOSTA-SESTA和背包移除的影响》中的数据,除了发布到虚空中,还分享了性工作者在残疾和歧视性在线系统中的经验。我们强调了恐嫖内容节制和惩罚性平台监管是如何对残疾性工作者产生独特影响的,尤其是那些依靠视觉或听觉辅助工具参与社交媒体的人。在这样做的过程中,我们强调了残疾正义、性工作者正义和设计正义之间的关键交叉点,以倡导运动之间合作的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信