On the nature of acquiescence to police authority: A commentary on Hamm et al. (2022)

IF 2.2 2区社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY

Legal and Criminological Psychology Pub Date : 2022-06-21 DOI:10.1111/lcrp.12217

Jonathan Jackson, Ben Bradford

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The excellent target article raises much food for thought. In this commentary we first discuss what is included in their proposed category of ‘positive evaluations and responses to police assertions of power to attempt social influence’. We then consider some of the implications of the concentric diagram for our understanding of police authority and power.

查看原文本刊更多论文

关于默许警察权力的性质：对哈姆等人的评论（2022）

这篇优秀的目标文章引人深思。在这篇评论中，我们首先讨论了他们提出的“对警察试图施加社会影响的权力主张的积极评价和反应”的范畴。然后，我们考虑同心图对我们理解警察权威和权力的一些含义。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Legal and Criminological Psychology Multiple-

CiteScore

4.00

自引率

4.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： Legal and Criminological Psychology publishes original papers in all areas of psychology and law: - victimology - policing and crime detection - crime prevention - management of offenders - mental health and the law - public attitudes to law - role of the expert witness - impact of law on behaviour - interviewing and eyewitness testimony - jury decision making - deception The journal publishes papers which advance professional and scientific knowledge defined broadly as the application of psychology to law and interdisciplinary enquiry in legal and psychological fields.