Hester Pulter's Dunghill Poetics

IF 0.1 Q4 CULTURAL STUDIES
F. Dolan
{"title":"Hester Pulter's Dunghill Poetics","authors":"F. Dolan","doi":"10.1353/JEM.2020.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:Hester Pulter frequently mentions dunghills, often using the word as an adjective to describe the earth. The dunghill might not appear to require much glossing, but its seventeenth-century meanings were more nuanced—literally, layered—than we might expect. While some of Pulter's contemporaries used \"dunghill\" to describe what we might call a dump—the final destination of garbage—they most often used the words \"dunghill\" and \"muckheap\" to describe repositories where organic matter of various kinds was gathered and transformed into compost to enrich soil. In the seventeenth century, this kind of dunghill—a matrix as well as a grave—was revalued and promoted as part of a larger reconsideration of waste as resource. The generative dunghill models Pulter's poetic process (recombining, ruminating, and revising) as well as the accretive and collaborative process that is the online edition called The Pulter Project. Seeing the dunghill as a creative process challenges divisions between elite poetry and agricultural labor, figural and literal, and even this life and the next. This essay's inquiry into the material history and figural resonances of the dunghill aspires not just to deepen our understanding of one of Pulter's keywords but also to interrogate the principles behind glossing and assembling \"curations\" for the online Pulter Project.","PeriodicalId":42614,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies","volume":"20 1","pages":"16 - 42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/JEM.2020.0008","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/JEM.2020.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

abstract:Hester Pulter frequently mentions dunghills, often using the word as an adjective to describe the earth. The dunghill might not appear to require much glossing, but its seventeenth-century meanings were more nuanced—literally, layered—than we might expect. While some of Pulter's contemporaries used "dunghill" to describe what we might call a dump—the final destination of garbage—they most often used the words "dunghill" and "muckheap" to describe repositories where organic matter of various kinds was gathered and transformed into compost to enrich soil. In the seventeenth century, this kind of dunghill—a matrix as well as a grave—was revalued and promoted as part of a larger reconsideration of waste as resource. The generative dunghill models Pulter's poetic process (recombining, ruminating, and revising) as well as the accretive and collaborative process that is the online edition called The Pulter Project. Seeing the dunghill as a creative process challenges divisions between elite poetry and agricultural labor, figural and literal, and even this life and the next. This essay's inquiry into the material history and figural resonances of the dunghill aspires not just to deepen our understanding of one of Pulter's keywords but also to interrogate the principles behind glossing and assembling "curations" for the online Pulter Project.
赫斯特·普尔特的粪堆诗学
海丝特·普尔特经常提到粪堆,经常用这个词作为形容词来形容地球。粪堆这个词似乎不需要太多的修饰,但它在17世纪的含义比我们想象的要微妙得多——从字面上看,层次分明。与普尔特同时代的一些人用“粪堆”来形容我们所谓的“垃圾场”——垃圾的最终归宿——他们最常用的词是“粪堆”和“粪堆”来形容收集各种有机物质并将其转化为堆肥以丰富土壤的仓库。在17世纪,这种粪堆——既是基质又是坟墓——作为一种更大的重新考虑废物作为资源的一部分而被重新评估和推广。生成式粪堆模拟了普尔特的诗歌过程(重组、反刍和修改),以及在线版本“普尔特计划”中增加和合作的过程。将粪堆视为一种创作过程,挑战了精英诗歌与农业劳动、形象与文字、甚至今生与来世之间的分歧。本文对粪堆的物质历史和形象共鸣的探究,不仅是为了加深我们对普尔特关键词之一的理解,也是为了探究普尔特在线项目“策展”背后的原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信