Watch and wait strategies for rectal cancer A systematic review

IF 1.9 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
I. Park
{"title":"Watch and wait strategies for rectal cancer A systematic review","authors":"I. Park","doi":"10.23838/pfm.2021.00177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Watch and wait (WW) strategies have been suggested for patients with clinical complete regression (cCR). The WW approach was first introduced by Habr–Gama in patients with cCR after neoadjuvant treatment. Actually, it is not “no surgery” but “deferral of surgery;” therefore, the WW approach or non-operative management is a representative term currently. The number of publications regarding WW for rectal cancer has increased abruptly. We conducted a systematic review of PubMed for literature published on WW. It is now one of the most interesting issues in rectal cancer treatment. Many studies have reported comparable overall survival with WW and radical resection. However, a high local regrowth rate is a problem, and proper salvage management is the main concern in the WW approach. Adequate patient selection is necessary to achieve favorable oncologic outcomes. However, the appropriate definition and diagnostic method for cCR have not yet been clearly defined. Indeed, advances in local control have not translated into overall survival improvement, and many efforts have been made to improve distant metastasis control and overall survival and improve clinical response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy. In this review, oncologic outcomes, ongoing efforts to improve oncologic outcomes, and limitations for clinical practice were evaluated and described.","PeriodicalId":42462,"journal":{"name":"Precision and Future Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Precision and Future Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23838/pfm.2021.00177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Watch and wait (WW) strategies have been suggested for patients with clinical complete regression (cCR). The WW approach was first introduced by Habr–Gama in patients with cCR after neoadjuvant treatment. Actually, it is not “no surgery” but “deferral of surgery;” therefore, the WW approach or non-operative management is a representative term currently. The number of publications regarding WW for rectal cancer has increased abruptly. We conducted a systematic review of PubMed for literature published on WW. It is now one of the most interesting issues in rectal cancer treatment. Many studies have reported comparable overall survival with WW and radical resection. However, a high local regrowth rate is a problem, and proper salvage management is the main concern in the WW approach. Adequate patient selection is necessary to achieve favorable oncologic outcomes. However, the appropriate definition and diagnostic method for cCR have not yet been clearly defined. Indeed, advances in local control have not translated into overall survival improvement, and many efforts have been made to improve distant metastasis control and overall survival and improve clinical response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy. In this review, oncologic outcomes, ongoing efforts to improve oncologic outcomes, and limitations for clinical practice were evaluated and described.
癌症观察和等待策略的系统评价
观察和等待(WW)策略已被建议用于临床完全回归(cCR)患者。Habr–Gama首次在新辅助治疗后的cCR患者中引入WW方法。实际上,它不是“不手术”,而是“推迟手术”;因此,WW方法或非手术管理是目前的一个代表性术语。关于直肠癌症WW的出版物数量急剧增加。我们对PubMed在WW上发表的文献进行了系统综述。这是目前癌症直肠治疗中最有趣的问题之一。许多研究报告WW和根治性切除术的总生存率相当。然而,高的局部再生率是一个问题,适当的打捞管理是WW方法中主要关注的问题。为了获得良好的肿瘤学结果,需要充分选择患者。然而,cCR的适当定义和诊断方法尚未明确定义。事实上,局部控制的进展并没有转化为总体生存率的提高,已经做出了许多努力来提高远处转移的控制和总体生存率,并提高对术前放化疗的临床反应。在这篇综述中,对肿瘤学结果、正在进行的改善肿瘤学结果的努力以及临床实践的局限性进行了评估和描述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Precision and Future Medicine
Precision and Future Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
10 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信