Transit-oriented development for older people: Does using multiple public transport options improve their physical and mental health?

IF 1.6 4区 工程技术 Q4 TRANSPORTATION
Yao Du, Guibo Sun, M. Kwan
{"title":"Transit-oriented development for older people: Does using multiple public transport options improve their physical and mental health?","authors":"Yao Du, Guibo Sun, M. Kwan","doi":"10.5198/jtlu.2022.2152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Transit-oriented cities often use urban rail transit (e.g., metro) to lead public transport development (TOD), which might overlook other public transport options (e.g., bus) that matter for the health and wellbeing of older people. We investigate older people’s public transport use patterns and how multiple public transport options are related to the physical and mental health of older people. \nIn the case city of Hong Kong, which is well-known for its metro-led transit-oriented development, we collected questionnaire data from 826 older people on their public transport use behaviors, route environment to normally used stops/stations, and physical and mental health. We used univariate analysis to measure explanatory factors (P<0.25). We applied multivariable linear regression models with several sensitivity analyses to test the associations among public transport use, route environment, and health outcomes, adjusting for covariates of individual factors, physical activity, and self-reported chronic disease. \nWe found that (1) using multiple public transport options was positively associated with better physical health (p<0.001); (2) mixed metro and bus users had the highest physical activity (high level with MET-mins/week>3,000, 75%) as well as the best physical health (physical component summary (PCS) >50, 41.42%) and mental health (mental component summary (MCS) > 50, 68.28%), compared to bus-only or metro-only users; and (3) for mixed-mode users, pedestrian crowdedness was negatively associated with physical health (p < 0.01), while satisfaction in sidewalk width was positively related to mental health (p=0.038).\nWe found that older people prefer multiple public transport options rather than the metro-dominated single-mode, and this travel preference benefits the physical and mental health of this population. Our research helps deepen the understanding of public transport use and associated health outcomes among older people and has policy implications for TOD planning concerning the aging population.","PeriodicalId":47271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport and Land Use","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport and Land Use","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2022.2152","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transit-oriented cities often use urban rail transit (e.g., metro) to lead public transport development (TOD), which might overlook other public transport options (e.g., bus) that matter for the health and wellbeing of older people. We investigate older people’s public transport use patterns and how multiple public transport options are related to the physical and mental health of older people. In the case city of Hong Kong, which is well-known for its metro-led transit-oriented development, we collected questionnaire data from 826 older people on their public transport use behaviors, route environment to normally used stops/stations, and physical and mental health. We used univariate analysis to measure explanatory factors (P<0.25). We applied multivariable linear regression models with several sensitivity analyses to test the associations among public transport use, route environment, and health outcomes, adjusting for covariates of individual factors, physical activity, and self-reported chronic disease. We found that (1) using multiple public transport options was positively associated with better physical health (p<0.001); (2) mixed metro and bus users had the highest physical activity (high level with MET-mins/week>3,000, 75%) as well as the best physical health (physical component summary (PCS) >50, 41.42%) and mental health (mental component summary (MCS) > 50, 68.28%), compared to bus-only or metro-only users; and (3) for mixed-mode users, pedestrian crowdedness was negatively associated with physical health (p < 0.01), while satisfaction in sidewalk width was positively related to mental health (p=0.038). We found that older people prefer multiple public transport options rather than the metro-dominated single-mode, and this travel preference benefits the physical and mental health of this population. Our research helps deepen the understanding of public transport use and associated health outcomes among older people and has policy implications for TOD planning concerning the aging population.
以交通为导向的老年人发展:使用多种公共交通选择是否能改善他们的身心健康?
以交通为导向的城市通常使用城市轨道交通(如地铁)来领导公共交通发展(TOD),这可能会忽视对老年人健康和福祉至关重要的其他公共交通选择(如公交车)。我们调查了老年人的公共交通使用模式,以及多种公共交通选择如何与老年人的身心健康相关。以香港为例,我们收集了826名老年人的公共交通使用行为、前往正常使用站点的路线环境以及身心健康的问卷数据。我们使用单变量分析来衡量解释因素(P3000,75%),以及最佳身体健康(身体成分汇总(PCS)>50,41.42%)和心理健康(心理成分汇总(MCS)>50,68.28%),与仅乘坐公交车或地铁的用户相比;(3)对于混合模式用户,行人拥挤与身体健康呈负相关(p<0.01),而人行道宽度满意度与心理健康呈正相关(p=0.038)。我们的研究有助于加深对老年人公共交通使用和相关健康结果的理解,并对老龄化人口的TOD规划具有政策意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
34
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Transport and Land Usepublishes original interdisciplinary papers on the interaction of transport and land use. Domains include: engineering, planning, modeling, behavior, economics, geography, regional science, sociology, architecture and design, network science, and complex systems. Papers reporting innovative methodologies, original data, and new empirical findings are especially encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信