Mentalizing in psychotherapy: patients’ and therapists’ reflective functioning during the psychotherapeutic process / Mentalizando en psicoterapia: funcionamiento reflexivo de pacientes y terapeutas durante el proceso psicoterapéutico

IF 0.8 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Cecilia de la Cerda, Alemka Tomicic, J. C. Pérez, Claudio Martínez, Javier Morán
{"title":"Mentalizing in psychotherapy: patients’ and therapists’ reflective functioning during the psychotherapeutic process / Mentalizando en psicoterapia: funcionamiento reflexivo de pacientes y terapeutas durante el proceso psicoterapéutico","authors":"Cecilia de la Cerda, Alemka Tomicic, J. C. Pérez, Claudio Martínez, Javier Morán","doi":"10.1080/02109395.2019.1583469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract There has been a growing interest in mentalization in clinical research given its relationship with normal and psychopathological functioning and its explanatory potential as a mechanism of psychotherapeutic change. This study uses the Reflective Functioning Scale (RFS) to identify and characterize mentalization manifestations in psychotherapeutic interaction. Method: the RFS was applied to a sample of relevant episodes — 44 sessions from five different psychotherapy processes carried out with adult patients who had different diagnoses. Results: we observed a higher probability of reflective functioning (RF) passages in relevant events than in neutral segments. There were no differences in the RF passages according to episode or actor type, but there were in RF Failures, which is more likely in patients and during rupture episodes. Discussion: although certain modifications are necessary, the RFS can be applied to clinical material, and it is a promising strategy for the study of mentalization within psychotherapy.","PeriodicalId":55642,"journal":{"name":"Estudios De Psicologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02109395.2019.1583469","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estudios De Psicologia","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02109395.2019.1583469","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract There has been a growing interest in mentalization in clinical research given its relationship with normal and psychopathological functioning and its explanatory potential as a mechanism of psychotherapeutic change. This study uses the Reflective Functioning Scale (RFS) to identify and characterize mentalization manifestations in psychotherapeutic interaction. Method: the RFS was applied to a sample of relevant episodes — 44 sessions from five different psychotherapy processes carried out with adult patients who had different diagnoses. Results: we observed a higher probability of reflective functioning (RF) passages in relevant events than in neutral segments. There were no differences in the RF passages according to episode or actor type, but there were in RF Failures, which is more likely in patients and during rupture episodes. Discussion: although certain modifications are necessary, the RFS can be applied to clinical material, and it is a promising strategy for the study of mentalization within psychotherapy.
心理治疗中的心智化:患者和治疗师在心理治疗过程中的反思功能/心理治疗中的心智化:患者和治疗师在心理治疗过程中的反思功能
由于心理化与正常和精神病理功能的关系及其作为心理治疗改变机制的解释潜力,临床研究对心理化的兴趣日益浓厚。本研究使用反思功能量表(RFS)来识别和表征心理治疗相互作用中的心理化表现。方法:将RFS应用于相关事件的样本-来自不同诊断的成年患者的5种不同心理治疗过程的44次会话。结果:我们观察到相关事件中反射功能(RF)通道的概率高于中性段。根据发作或演员类型,射频通道没有差异,但在射频失败中存在差异,这在患者和破裂发作期间更容易发生。讨论:虽然某些修改是必要的,但RFS可以应用于临床材料,并且它是心理治疗中心理化研究的一个有前途的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Estudios De Psicologia
Estudios De Psicologia PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信