The Reflected Mythological Patterns on Researchers’ Journey through Literacy Narratives

Mohammad Sugeng, P. Retnaningdyah, Ali Mustofa
{"title":"The Reflected Mythological Patterns on Researchers’ Journey through Literacy Narratives","authors":"Mohammad Sugeng, P. Retnaningdyah, Ali Mustofa","doi":"10.15642/NOBEL.2019.10.1.15-31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to provide a heroism mythological reflection on the journey of researchers. This study uses the qualitative case study to obtain the comprehension of researchers' metaphor journeys through Monomyth on their research experiences. The documentary analysis is used in this qualitative study with the reflexive narrative because the reflection on experience can help the reader to gain insight into the researcher and their approach during the journey. 15 researcher’s literacy narratives chosen in this study which consists of 8 published literacy narratives and 7 literacy narratives task from participants. Research itself often considered as a journey that extends the existing knowledge and also develops new knowledge of the researcher while wandering in the wilderness of knowledge. Along the way, the researchers with their literacy narratives in this study unconsciously have a similar mythical pattern story as like as the mythical heroes which Campbell (1949) term it as ‘Monomyth’ pattern. The result presented in this paper may facilitate the literate improvements in which to motivate, to help the novice researcher to understand their own hero’s journey and to educate them about the stages that they will experience such as their new transition of conducting their new research.","PeriodicalId":32715,"journal":{"name":"Nobel Journal of Literature and Language Teaching","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nobel Journal of Literature and Language Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15642/NOBEL.2019.10.1.15-31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper aims to provide a heroism mythological reflection on the journey of researchers. This study uses the qualitative case study to obtain the comprehension of researchers' metaphor journeys through Monomyth on their research experiences. The documentary analysis is used in this qualitative study with the reflexive narrative because the reflection on experience can help the reader to gain insight into the researcher and their approach during the journey. 15 researcher’s literacy narratives chosen in this study which consists of 8 published literacy narratives and 7 literacy narratives task from participants. Research itself often considered as a journey that extends the existing knowledge and also develops new knowledge of the researcher while wandering in the wilderness of knowledge. Along the way, the researchers with their literacy narratives in this study unconsciously have a similar mythical pattern story as like as the mythical heroes which Campbell (1949) term it as ‘Monomyth’ pattern. The result presented in this paper may facilitate the literate improvements in which to motivate, to help the novice researcher to understand their own hero’s journey and to educate them about the stages that they will experience such as their new transition of conducting their new research.
从识字叙事看研究者之旅的神话模式
本文旨在为研究者提供一个英雄主义神话之旅的反思。本研究采用定性案例研究的方法,从研究者的研究经历中获得对隐喻之旅的理解。在这项定性研究中,使用了文献分析和反射叙事,因为对经验的反思可以帮助读者深入了解研究人员及其在旅途中的方法。本研究选择了15名研究人员的识字叙事,其中包括8名已发表的识字叙事和7名参与者的识字叙事任务。研究本身通常被认为是一次在知识的荒野中徘徊的旅程,它扩展了现有的知识,也发展了研究者的新知识。在这一过程中,本研究中的研究人员及其识字叙事无意识地产生了一个类似于神话英雄的神话模式故事,坎贝尔(1949)将其称为“单一神话”模式。本文中提出的结果可能有助于提高识字率,帮助新手研究人员了解自己的英雄之旅,并教育他们将经历的阶段,例如进行新研究的新转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信